mirror of
https://github.com/fdiskyou/Zines.git
synced 2025-03-09 00:00:00 +01:00
458 lines
22 KiB
Text
458 lines
22 KiB
Text
![]() |
==Phrack Inc.==
|
||
|
|
||
|
Volume Three, Issue 30, File #5 of 12
|
||
|
|
||
|
()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()
|
||
|
() ()
|
||
|
() The DECWRL Mail Gateway ()
|
||
|
() ()
|
||
|
() by Dedicated Link ()
|
||
|
() ()
|
||
|
() September 20, 1989 ()
|
||
|
() ()
|
||
|
()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
INTRODUCTION
|
||
|
|
||
|
DECWRL is a mail gateway computer operated by Digital's Western Research
|
||
|
Laboratory in Palo Alto, California. Its purpose is to support the interchange
|
||
|
of electronic mail between Digital and the "outside world."
|
||
|
|
||
|
DECWRL is connected to Digital's Easynet, and also to a number of different
|
||
|
outside electronic mail networks. Digital users can send outside mail by
|
||
|
sending to DECWRL::"outside-address", and digital users can also receive mail
|
||
|
by having your correspondents route it through DECWRL. The details of incoming
|
||
|
mail are more complex, and are discussed below.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It is vitally important that Digital employees be good citizens of the networks
|
||
|
to which we are connected. They depend on the integrity of our user community
|
||
|
to ensure that tighter controls over the use of the gateway are not required.
|
||
|
The most important rule is "no chain letters," but there are other rules
|
||
|
depending on whether the connected network that you are using is commercial or
|
||
|
non-commercial.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The current traffic volume (September 1989) is about 10,000 mail messages per
|
||
|
day and about 3,000 USENET messages per day. Gatewayed mail traffic has
|
||
|
doubled every year since 1983. DECWRL is currently a Vax 8530 computer with 48
|
||
|
megabytes of main memory, 2500 megabytes of disk space, 8 9600-baud (Telebit)
|
||
|
modem ports, and various network connections. They will shortly be upgrading
|
||
|
to a Vax 8650 system. They run Ultrix 3.0 as the base operating system.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
ADMINISTRATION
|
||
|
|
||
|
The gateway has engineering staff, but no administrative or clerical staff.
|
||
|
They work hard to keep it running, but they do not have the resources to answer
|
||
|
telephone queries or provide tutorials in its use.
|
||
|
|
||
|
They post periodic status reports to the USENET newsgroup dec.general. Various
|
||
|
helpful people usually copy these reports to the VAXNOTES "gateways" conference
|
||
|
within a day or two.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
HOW TO SEND MAIL
|
||
|
|
||
|
DECWRL is connected to quite a number of different mail networks. If you were
|
||
|
logged on directly to it, you could type addresses directly, e.g.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To: strange!foreign!address.
|
||
|
|
||
|
But since you are not logged on directly to the gateway, you must send mail so
|
||
|
that when it arrives at the gateway, it will be sent as if that address had
|
||
|
been typed locally.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Sending from VMS
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you are a VMS user, you should use NMAIL, because VMS mail does not know how
|
||
|
to requeue and retry mail when the network is congested or disconnected. From
|
||
|
VMS, address your mail like this:
|
||
|
|
||
|
To: nm%DECWRL::"strange!foreign!address"
|
||
|
|
||
|
The quote characters (") are important, to make sure that VMS doesn't try to
|
||
|
interpret strange!foreign!address itself. If you are typing such an address
|
||
|
inside a mail program, it will work as advertised. If you are using DCL and
|
||
|
typing directly to the command line, you should beware that DCL likes to remove
|
||
|
quotes, so you will have to enclose the entire address in quotes, and then put
|
||
|
two quotes in every place that one quote should appear in the address:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ mail test.msg "nm%DECWRL::""foreign!addr""" /subj="hello"
|
||
|
|
||
|
Note the three quotes in a row after foreign!addr. The first two of them are
|
||
|
doubled to produce a single quote in the address, and the third ends the
|
||
|
address itself (balancing the quote in front of the nm%).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here are some typical outgoing mail addresses as used from a VMS system:
|
||
|
|
||
|
To: nm%DECWRL::"lll-winkin!netsys!phrack"
|
||
|
To: nm%DECWRL::"postmaster@msp.pnet.sc.edu"
|
||
|
To: nm%DECWRL::"netsys!phrack@uunet.uu.net"
|
||
|
To: nm%DECWRL::"phrackserv@CUNYVM.bitnet"
|
||
|
To: nm%DECWRL::"Chris.Jones@f654.n987.z1.fidonet.org"
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Sending from Ultrix
|
||
|
|
||
|
If your Ultrix system has been configured for it, then you can, from your
|
||
|
Ultrix system, just send directly to the foreign address, and the mail software
|
||
|
will take care of all of the gateway routing for you. Most Ultrix systems in
|
||
|
Corporate Research and in the Palo Alto cluster are configured this way.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To find out whether your Ultrix system has been so configured, just try it and
|
||
|
see what happens. If it doesn't work, you will receive notification almost
|
||
|
instantly.
|
||
|
|
||
|
NOTE: The Ultrix mail system is extremely flexible; it is almost
|
||
|
completely configurable by the customer. While this is valuable to
|
||
|
customers, it makes it very difficult to write global instructions for
|
||
|
the use of Ultrix mailers, because it is possible that the local changes
|
||
|
have produced something quite unlike the vendor-delivered mailer. One of
|
||
|
the popular changes is to tinker with the meaning of quote characters (")
|
||
|
in Ultrix addresses. Some systems consider that these two addresses are
|
||
|
the same:
|
||
|
|
||
|
site1!site2!user@host.dec.com
|
||
|
|
||
|
and
|
||
|
|
||
|
"site1!site2!user"@host.dec.com
|
||
|
|
||
|
while others are configured so that one form will work and the other
|
||
|
will not. All of these examples use the quotes. If you have trouble
|
||
|
getting the examples to work, please try them again without the quotes.
|
||
|
Perhaps your Ultrix system is interpreting the quotes differently.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If your Ultrix system has an IP link to Palo Alto (type "/etc/ping
|
||
|
decwrl.dec.com" to find out if it does), then you can route your mail to the
|
||
|
gateway via IP. This has the advantage that your Ultrix mail headers will
|
||
|
reach the gateway directly, instead of being translated into DECNET mail
|
||
|
headers and then back into Ultrix at the other end. Do this as follows:
|
||
|
|
||
|
To: "alien!address"@decwrl.dec.com
|
||
|
|
||
|
The quotes are necessary only if the alien address contains a ! character, but
|
||
|
they don't hurt if you use them unnecessarily. If the alien address contains
|
||
|
an "@" character, you will need to change it into a "%" character. For
|
||
|
example, to send via IP to joe@widget.org, you should address the mail
|
||
|
|
||
|
To: "joe%widget.org"@decwrl.dec.com
|
||
|
|
||
|
If your Ultrix system has only a DECNET link to Palo Alto, then you should
|
||
|
address mail in much the same way that VMS users do, save that you should not
|
||
|
put the nm% in front of the address:
|
||
|
|
||
|
To: DECWRL::"strange!foreign!address"
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here are some typical outgoing mail addresses as used from an Ultrix system
|
||
|
that has IP access. Ultrix systems without IP access should use the same
|
||
|
syntax as VMS users, except that the nm% at the front of the address should not
|
||
|
be used.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To: "lll-winken!netsys!phrack"@decwrl.dec.com
|
||
|
To: "postmaster%msp.pnet.sc.edu"@decwrl.dec.com
|
||
|
To: "phrackserv%CUNYVM.bitnet"@decwrl.dec.com
|
||
|
To: "netsys!phrack%uunet.uu.net"@decwrl.dec.com
|
||
|
To: "Chris.Jones@f654.n987.z1.fidonet.org"@decwrl.dec.com
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
DETAILS OF USING OTHER NETWORKS
|
||
|
|
||
|
All of the world's computer networks are connected together, more or less, so
|
||
|
it is hard to draw exact boundaries between them. Precisely where the Internet
|
||
|
ends and UUCP begins is a matter of interpretation.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For purposes of sending mail, though, it is convenient to divide the network
|
||
|
universe into these categories:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Easynet Digital's internal DECNET network. Characterized by addresses
|
||
|
of the form NODE::USER. Easynet can be used for commercial
|
||
|
purposes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Internet A collection of networks including the old ARPAnet, the NSFnet,
|
||
|
the CSnet, and others. Most international research,
|
||
|
development, and educational organizations are connected in
|
||
|
some fashion to the Internet. Characterized by addresses of
|
||
|
the form user@site.subdomain.domain. The Internet itself
|
||
|
cannot be used for commercial purposes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
UUCP A very primitive network with no management, built with
|
||
|
auto-dialers phoning one computer from another. Characterized
|
||
|
by addresses of the form place1!place2!user. The UUCP network
|
||
|
can be used for commercial purposes provided that none of the
|
||
|
sites through which the message is routed objects to that.
|
||
|
|
||
|
USENET Not a network at all, but a layer of software built on top of
|
||
|
UUCP and Internet.
|
||
|
|
||
|
BITNET An IBM-based network linking primarily educational sites.
|
||
|
Digital users can send to BITNET as if it were part of
|
||
|
Internet, but BITNET users need special instructions for
|
||
|
reversing the process. BITNET cannot be used for commercial
|
||
|
purposes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Fidonet A network of personal computers. I am unsure of the status of
|
||
|
using Fidonet for commercial purposes, nor am I sure of its
|
||
|
efficacy.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
DOMAINS AND DOMAIN ADDRESSING
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is a particular network called "the Internet;" it is somewhat related to
|
||
|
what used to be "the ARPAnet." The Internet style of addressing is flexible
|
||
|
enough that people use it for addressing other networks as well, with the
|
||
|
result that it is quite difficult to look at an address and tell just what
|
||
|
network it is likely to traverse. But the phrase "Internet address" does not
|
||
|
mean "mail address of some computer on the Internet" but rather "mail address
|
||
|
in the style used by the Internet." Terminology is even further confused
|
||
|
because the word "address" means one thing to people who build networks and
|
||
|
something entirely different to people who use them. In this file an "address"
|
||
|
is something like "mike@decwrl.dec.com" and not "192.1.24.177" (which is what
|
||
|
network engineers would call an "internet address").
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Internet naming scheme uses hierarchical domains, which despite their title
|
||
|
are just a bookkeeping trick. It doesn't really matter whether you say
|
||
|
NODE::USER or USER@NODE, but what happens when you connect two companies'
|
||
|
networks together and they both have a node ANCHOR?? You must, somehow,
|
||
|
specify which ANCHOR you mean. You could say ANCHOR.DEC::USER or
|
||
|
DEC.ANCHOR::USER or USER@ANCHOR.DEC or USER@DEC.ANCHOR. The Internet
|
||
|
convention is to say USER@ANCHOR.DEC, with the owner (DEC) after the name
|
||
|
(ANCHOR).
|
||
|
|
||
|
But there could be several different organizations named DEC. You could have
|
||
|
Digital Equipment Corporation or Down East College or Disabled Education
|
||
|
Committee. The technique that the Internet scheme uses to resolve conflicts
|
||
|
like this is to have hierarchical domains. A normal domain isn't DEC or
|
||
|
STANFORD, but DEC.COM (commercial) and STANFORD.EDU (educational). These
|
||
|
domains can be further divided into ZK3.DEC.COM or CS.STANFORD.EDU. This
|
||
|
doesn't resolve conflicts completely, though: both Central Michigan University
|
||
|
and Carnegie-Mellon University could claim to be CMU.EDU. The rule is that the
|
||
|
owner of the EDU domain gets to decide, just as the owner of the CMU.EDU gets
|
||
|
to decide whether the Electrical Engineering department or the Elementary
|
||
|
Education department gets subdomain EE.CMU.EDU.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The domain scheme, while not perfect, is completely extensible. If you have
|
||
|
two addresses that can potentially conflict, you can suffix some domain to the
|
||
|
end of them, thereby making, say, decwrl.UUCP be somehow different from
|
||
|
DECWRL.ENET.
|
||
|
|
||
|
DECWRL's entire mail system is organized according to Internet domains, and in
|
||
|
fact we handle all mail internally as if it were Internet mail. Incoming mail
|
||
|
is converted into Internet mail, and then routed to the appropriate domain; if
|
||
|
that domain requires some conversion, then the mail is converted to the
|
||
|
requirements of the outbound domain as it passes through the gateway. For
|
||
|
example, they put Easynet mail into the domain ENET.DEC.COM, and they put
|
||
|
BITNET mail into the domain BITNET.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The "top-level" domains supported by the DECWRL gateway are these:
|
||
|
|
||
|
.EDU Educational institutions
|
||
|
.COM Commercial institutions
|
||
|
.GOV Government institutions
|
||
|
.MIL Military institutions
|
||
|
.ORG Various organizations
|
||
|
.NET Network operations
|
||
|
.BITNET The BITNET
|
||
|
.MAILNET The MAILNET
|
||
|
.?? 2-character country code for routing to other countries
|
||
|
.OZ Part of the Australian (.AU) name space.
|
||
|
|
||
|
2-character country codes include UK (United Kingdom), FR (France), IT (Italy),
|
||
|
CA (Canada), AU (Australia), etc. These are the standard ISO 2-character
|
||
|
country codes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAILING TO EASYNET
|
||
|
|
||
|
To mail to user SPRINTER at node WASH (which is DECNET address WASH::SPRINTER),
|
||
|
Internet mail should be addressed to sprinter@wash.enet.dec.com. Easynet
|
||
|
addresses are not case-dependent; WASH and wash are the same node name and
|
||
|
SPRINTER and sprinter are the same user name.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sites that are not directly connected to the Internet may have difficulty with
|
||
|
Internet addresses like wash.enet.dec.com. They can send into the Easynet by
|
||
|
explicitly routing the mail through DECWRL. From domain-based Internet
|
||
|
mailers, the address would be sprinter%wash.enet@decwrl.dec.com. From UUCP
|
||
|
mailers, the address would be decwrl!wash.enet!sprinter. Some Internet mailers
|
||
|
require the form <@decwrl.dec.com:sprinter@wash.enet>. (This last form is the
|
||
|
only technically correct form of explicit route, but very few Internet sites
|
||
|
support it.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The DECWRL gateway also supports various obsolete forms of addressing that are
|
||
|
left over from the past. In general they support obsolete address forms for
|
||
|
two years after the change, and then remove it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAILING TO DIGITAL ALL-IN-1 USERS
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some Easynet users do not have a direct DECNET node address, but instead read
|
||
|
their mail with All-in-1, which uses addresses of the form "Nate State @UCA".
|
||
|
Here "UCA" is a Digital location code name. To route mail to such people, send
|
||
|
to Nate.State@UCA.MTS.DEC.COM. Mail received from the All-in-1 mailer is
|
||
|
unreplyable, and in fact unless the respondent tells you his return address in
|
||
|
the body of the message, it is not normally possible even to puzzle out the
|
||
|
return address by studying the message header. Mail from All-in-1 to Easynet
|
||
|
passes through a gateway program that does not produce valid return addresses.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAILING TO THE INTERNET
|
||
|
|
||
|
DECWRL's mailer is an Internet mailer, so to mail to an Internet site, just use
|
||
|
its address. If you are having trouble determining the Internet address, you
|
||
|
might find that the Ultrix host table /etc/hosts.txt is useful. If you can't
|
||
|
find one anywhere else, there's one on DECWRL. See the comments above under
|
||
|
"how to send mail" for details about making sure that the mail program you are
|
||
|
using has correctly interpreted an address.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAILING TO UUCP
|
||
|
|
||
|
UUCP mail is manually routed by the sender, using ! as the separator character.
|
||
|
Thus, the address xxx!yyy!zzz!user means to dial machine xxx and relay to it
|
||
|
the mail, with the destination address set to yyy!zzz!user. That machine in
|
||
|
turn dials yyy, and the process repeats itself.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To correctly address UUCP mail, you must know a working path through the UUCP
|
||
|
network. The database is sufficiently chaotic that automatic routing does not
|
||
|
work reliably (though many sites perform automatic routing anyhow). The
|
||
|
information about UUCP connectivity is distributed in the USENET newsgroup
|
||
|
comp.mail.maps; many sites collect this data and permit local queries of it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
At the end of this file is a list of the UUCP nodes to which DECWRL currently
|
||
|
has a working connection.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAILING TO USENET
|
||
|
|
||
|
Usenet is not a network. It's a software layer, and it spans several networks.
|
||
|
Many people say "Usenet" when they really mean UUCP. You can post a message to
|
||
|
a Usenet newsgroup by mailing it to "name@usenet" at DECWRL. For example,
|
||
|
mailing from VMS to this address:
|
||
|
|
||
|
nm%DECWRL::"alt.cyberpunk@usenet"
|
||
|
|
||
|
causes the mail message to be posted as an article to the Usenet newsgroup
|
||
|
alt.cyberpunk. It is better to use Usenet software for posting articles, as
|
||
|
more features are available that way, such as restricted distributions,
|
||
|
crossposting, and cancellation of "wish I hadn't sent that" articles.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAILING TO BITNET
|
||
|
|
||
|
Legend has it that the "BIT" in BITNET stands for "Because It's There" or
|
||
|
"Because It's Time." It is a network consisting primarily of IBM computers. A
|
||
|
native BITNET address is something like "OMAR at STANFORD", but when translated
|
||
|
into our Internet format it becomes omar@stanford.bitnet. Once translated into
|
||
|
Internet form, a BITNET address is used just like any other Internet address.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAILING TO FIDONET
|
||
|
|
||
|
By comparison with the other linked networks, Fidonet has an addressing
|
||
|
complexity bordering on the bizarre. The Fidonet people have provided me with
|
||
|
this description:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Each Fidonet node is a member of a "network," and may have subsidiary nodes
|
||
|
called "point nodes." A typical Fido address is "1:987/654" or "987/654"; a
|
||
|
typical Fido "point node" address is "1:987/654.32" or "987/654.32". This is
|
||
|
zone 1, network 987, Fido (node) 654, "point node" 32. If the zone number is
|
||
|
missing, assume it is zone 1. The zone number must be supplied in the outgoing
|
||
|
message.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To send a message to Chris Jones on Fidonet address 1:987/654, use the address
|
||
|
Chris.Jones@f654.n987.z1.fidonet.org. To send a message to Mark Smith at
|
||
|
Fidonet node 987/654.32, use address Mark.Smith@p32.f654.n987.z1.fidonet.org.
|
||
|
Use them just like any other Internet address.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sometimes the return addresses on messages from Fidonet will look different.
|
||
|
You may or may not be able to reply to them.
|
||
|
|
||
|
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
||
|
|
||
|
Appendix: List of UUCP Neighbor Sites
|
||
|
|
||
|
This table shows most of the sites that DECWRL dials directly via UUCP. You
|
||
|
may find it useful to help you construct a UUCP route to a particular
|
||
|
destination. Those sites marked with "*" are major UUCP routing nodes. You
|
||
|
should prefer UUCP routes that use these sites as the first hop from DECWRL.
|
||
|
Case is significant in UUCP host names.
|
||
|
|
||
|
3comvax 3Com Corporation, Santa Clara, CA
|
||
|
abvax Allen-Bradley Company, Highland Heights, OH
|
||
|
acad Autodesk, Inc, Sausalito, CA
|
||
|
adobe Adobe Systems Inc., Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
alberta University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
||
|
allegra AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
|
||
|
*amdahl Amdahl Corp., Sunnyvale, CA
|
||
|
amdcad Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale, CA
|
||
|
ames NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
*apple Apple Computers, Cupertino, CA
|
||
|
ardent Ardent Computer Corp., Sunnyvale, CA
|
||
|
argosy MassPar Computer Corp., Sunnyvale, CA
|
||
|
atha Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada
|
||
|
athertn Atherton Technology, Sunnyvale, CA
|
||
|
*att AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio
|
||
|
avsd Ampex Corporation, Redwood City, CA
|
||
|
cae780 Tektronix Inc. (Santa Clara Field Office) Santa Clara, CA
|
||
|
chip M/A-COM Government Systems, San Diego, CA
|
||
|
claris Claris Corporation, Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
daisy Daisy Systems, Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
decuac DEC/Ultrix Applications Ctr, Landover, MD
|
||
|
*decvax DEC/Ultrix Engineering, Nashua, NH
|
||
|
dsinc Datacomp Systems, Inc, Huntington Valley, PA
|
||
|
eda EDA Systems Inc., Santa Clara, CA
|
||
|
emerald Emerald Systems Corp., San Diego, CA
|
||
|
escd Evans and Sutherland Computer Division, Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
esunix Evans and Sutherland Corp., Salt Lake City, UT
|
||
|
fluke John Fluke Manufacturing, Everett, WA
|
||
|
gryphon Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
|
||
|
handel Colorodo State Univ., CS Dept., Ft. Collins, CO
|
||
|
hoptoad Nebula Consultants, San Francisco, CA
|
||
|
*hplabs Hewlett Packard Research Labs, Palo Alto, CA
|
||
|
ide Interactive Development Environments, San Francisco, CA
|
||
|
idi Intelligent Decisions, Inc., San Jose, CA
|
||
|
imagen Imagen Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
||
|
intelca Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
||
|
limbo Intuitive Systems, Los Altos, CA
|
||
|
logitech Logitech, Inc., Palo Alto, CA
|
||
|
megatest Megatest Corp., San Jose, CA
|
||
|
metaphor Metaphor Corp., Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
microsoft Microsoft, Bellevue, WA
|
||
|
mindcrf Mindcraft Corp., Palo Alto, CA
|
||
|
mips MIPS Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
mntgfx Mentor Graphics Corp., Beaverton, OR
|
||
|
mordor Lawrence Livermore National Lab, Livermore, CA
|
||
|
mtu Michigan Tech Univ., Houghton, MI
|
||
|
mtxinu Mt. Xinu, Berkeley, CA
|
||
|
nsc National Semiconductor Corp., Sunnyvale, CA
|
||
|
oli-stl Olivetti Software Techn. Lab, Menlo Park, CA
|
||
|
oracle Oracle Corp., Belmont, CA
|
||
|
*pacbell Pacific Bell, San Ramon, CA
|
||
|
parcplace Parc Place Systems, Palo Alto, CA
|
||
|
purdue Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
|
||
|
*pyramid Pyramid Technology Corporation, Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
qubix Qubix Graphic Systems, San Jose, CA
|
||
|
quintus Quintus Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
research AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
|
||
|
riacs Res.Inst. for Adv. Compu. Sci., Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
rtech Relational Technology Inc., Alameda, CA
|
||
|
sci Silicon Compilers, San Jose, CA
|
||
|
sco Santa Cruz Operation, Santa Cruz, CA
|
||
|
sequent Sequent Computer System, Inc., Beaverton, OR
|
||
|
sgi Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
shell Shell Development Corp., Houston, TX
|
||
|
simpact Simpact Assoc., San Diego, CA
|
||
|
sjsca4 Schlumberger Technologies, San Jose, CA
|
||
|
sun Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, CA
|
||
|
td2cad Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA
|
||
|
teraida Teradyne EDA Inc., Santa Clara, CA
|
||
|
theta Process Software Inc., Wellesley, MA
|
||
|
turtlevax CIMLINC, Inc, Palo Alto, CA
|
||
|
*ucbvax University of California, Berkeley, CA
|
||
|
utcsri Univ. of Toronto, Computer Science, Toronto, CA
|
||
|
vlsisj VLSI Technology Inc., San Jose, CA
|
||
|
wyse Wyse Technology, San Jose, CA
|
||
|
zehntel Zehntel, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA
|
||
|
_______________________________________________________________________________
|