mirror of
https://github.com/fdiskyou/Zines.git
synced 2025-03-09 00:00:00 +01:00
537 lines
28 KiB
Text
537 lines
28 KiB
Text
![]() |
==Phrack Inc.==
|
||
|
|
||
|
Volume 0x0e, Issue 0x43, Phile #0x0f of 0x10
|
||
|
|
||
|
|=-------------------------------------------------------------------------------=|
|
||
|
|=-----------------=[ Hacking the mind for fun and profit ]=---------------------=|
|
||
|
|=-------------------------------------------------------------------------------=|
|
||
|
|=------------------------=[ by lvxferis@gmail.com ]=----------------------------=|
|
||
|
|=-------------------------------------------------------------------------------=|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
--[ Contents
|
||
|
|
||
|
1 - Introduction
|
||
|
|
||
|
2 - How does the human conscious function
|
||
|
2.1 - Decisional pattern programming
|
||
|
2.2 - Role Model programming (behavioral mimetism from trusted sources)
|
||
|
|
||
|
3 - Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP)
|
||
|
|
||
|
4 - Why does NLP function?
|
||
|
|
||
|
5 - What is reality - "What is above is what is beneath"
|
||
|
|
||
|
6 - Human thoughts affecting reality
|
||
|
|
||
|
7 - How to create a hostile reality?
|
||
|
|
||
|
8 - The chains remain
|
||
|
|
||
|
9 - Greetz
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
--[ 1 - Introduction
|
||
|
|
||
|
Oh no, not another "hacking your brain" article, please! I don't
|
||
|
even want to know what is really going on with my mind, I love to
|
||
|
be fed with the bullshit I get every day because I'm an ignorant
|
||
|
bastard -- if you think this, then stop reading NOW because I don't
|
||
|
even intent to have you people as an audience. Instead, I am
|
||
|
addressing to those who have noticed the "glitches", the anomalies
|
||
|
in the "matrix"; those who became hackers not because "computers
|
||
|
are cool now" but because of their ancestral eager of knowledge and
|
||
|
keen on spotting things that are not natural to their environment.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
--[ 2 - How does the human conscious function
|
||
|
|
||
|
Human mind is a self-programming bio-computer -- i'm not the first
|
||
|
one to say this. Human mind is programming itself consciously by
|
||
|
by applying a decisional pattern, by following a model or a combination
|
||
|
of both.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-----[ 2.1 - Decisional pattern programming
|
||
|
|
||
|
Remember when you were a little baby and felt attracted to that
|
||
|
flame and actually touched it. It burnt you so bad and the pain was
|
||
|
so intense that you never played with fire again! ;) Pain is the
|
||
|
method our spiritual mind uses to teach itself about the environment
|
||
|
it deals with. Decisional pattern programming is based on rational
|
||
|
analysis of facts correlated to past experiences, as similar as
|
||
|
possible to the new experience encountered, and all this
|
||
|
corroborated with the intensity of pain. Pain is nothing more but
|
||
|
electrical signals sent by your neural system to your brain, which
|
||
|
your spiritual mind interprets as a high disconfort, telling that
|
||
|
the environment is reacting against your body. But some people
|
||
|
apparently tolerate pain more than others; no, that's not true. We
|
||
|
all feel the pain the same, it's just we can educate our spiritual
|
||
|
mind to ignore the pain.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-----[ 2.2 - Role Model programming (behavioral mimetism from trusted sources)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ever since we are little children, we have role models to follow in
|
||
|
society. They can be historical figures, philosophers, favourite
|
||
|
hiphop star, people everybody knows and that, one way or the other,
|
||
|
made it into this society, or simply, your mother or father, bigger
|
||
|
brother, one of your friends, your menthor, etc. They all share one
|
||
|
common feature: they posses a quality you would like to grow in you
|
||
|
or they are an important part of your life. Think about it, how many
|
||
|
times didn't you think about disappointing someone you care about if
|
||
|
you do something you really want. How many of you still did that
|
||
|
thing? By confronting our spiritual (rational) mind with the
|
||
|
impressions and oppinions of our role models, minute by minute we
|
||
|
become more like our role models, becoming what we decided we should
|
||
|
be like.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To understand how your mind works, start seeing your ordinary life as
|
||
|
a serie of events. The events fall into one of the following
|
||
|
categories:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- new events
|
||
|
- new events similar to old events
|
||
|
- old events
|
||
|
|
||
|
When dealing with an event, your mind starts an analysis of the
|
||
|
event, and searches the "archive" for an identical event. If none is
|
||
|
found, your mind searches the "archive" for a similar event and
|
||
|
tries to determine if past decisions and conditions would be fit in the
|
||
|
current conditions. The new and similar events are the ones
|
||
|
generating experience, by forcing your spiritual mind to make
|
||
|
decisions to adapt as good as possible to the given environment. But
|
||
|
everyone's decision depends a lot on previous experience. The added
|
||
|
experience improves your rational thinking and gives you a higher
|
||
|
perspective over events, under a new superior logic. Each category
|
||
|
of events has assigned a process that deals with it. For instance,
|
||
|
if your car breaks down, you would see the problem more accurately
|
||
|
if you are a car mechanic than if you are a doctor. The car mechanic
|
||
|
posses more technical informations about cars (therefore, superior
|
||
|
logic of things) than a doctor or a florist, for instance. By the
|
||
|
other hand, if your body breaks down, being a doctor will help you
|
||
|
determine what went wrong and what needs to be done to eliminate
|
||
|
this situation rather than being a car mechanic.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The process of learning is a never ending process in your mind; it
|
||
|
takes at least as long as you're exposed to new events. But it takes
|
||
|
in three stages: the conscious and willing part, the reinforcement
|
||
|
part and the "background" part.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The conscious and willing process is the one interacting the most with the
|
||
|
decisional process. It's when you see some behavior or moral virtue
|
||
|
or something to that extent that you like and you'd actually want to
|
||
|
grow that in you -- for instance you want to be a greater whitehat
|
||
|
than spender, because you see the whitehats as being the good guys
|
||
|
and you've been taught that good guys are good. To do that, you see
|
||
|
what got spender where he is and start to "walk" a similar path.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is where the reinforcement stage gets into place -- you already
|
||
|
decided that you want it, and you force yourself to take the steps
|
||
|
needed. You get aquinted to the Linux Kernel, find bugs, expose them
|
||
|
on full-disclosure, look for fights with kernel dev, etc. The
|
||
|
conscious interaction will help you get status of yourself: "am i
|
||
|
spender enough to do this?" or "what would spender do"; in the same
|
||
|
time it will correct behavioral flaws that might prevent you from
|
||
|
succeeding. After a while, the conscious interaction tends to diminish,
|
||
|
becoming less and less necessary. This is where stage three comes into
|
||
|
place.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The "background" stage is where the actual process needs no longer
|
||
|
interaction with the conscious mind, being perfectly adapted to
|
||
|
serve similar events. To continue our metaphore, at this point you
|
||
|
get fat dollars from sponsorships, you're being a dick to your friends,
|
||
|
and publish vulnerabilities you found in Linux Kernel. And all this
|
||
|
is normal, and you don't understand why people throwing fingers at
|
||
|
you. You're doing the "right" thing..
|
||
|
|
||
|
When dealing with a new event, your mind will try to categorize that
|
||
|
event and try to place it under one of the known events categories.
|
||
|
Each category of events has assigned a process; a neural process is
|
||
|
very similar to an AI neural network path. The processes for known
|
||
|
events give you the daily routine, when you don't even think about
|
||
|
doing something, you just do it, automatically. Therefore, PROCESSES
|
||
|
IN "BACKGROUND STAGE" (SERVING KNOWN PATTERNS) DO NOT REQUIRE RATIONAL
|
||
|
(CONSCIOUS) MIND SCRUTINY!!! This makes them as a primary target for
|
||
|
those trying to manipulate you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
--[ 3 - Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP)
|
||
|
|
||
|
According to Wikipedia, Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) is a
|
||
|
controversial approach to psychotherapy and organizational change based on
|
||
|
"a model of interpersonal communication chiefly concerned with the
|
||
|
relationship between successful patterns of behaviour and the subjective
|
||
|
experiences (esp. patterns of thought) underlying them" and "a system of
|
||
|
alternative therapy based on this which seeks to educate people in
|
||
|
self-awareness and effective communication, and to change their patterns
|
||
|
of mental and emotional behaviour". NLP denotes belief in a connection
|
||
|
between neurological processes ('neuro'), language ('linguistic') and
|
||
|
behavioral patterns that have been learned through experience
|
||
|
('programming'). The "subjective experiences" are what we called neural
|
||
|
processes dealing with events.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
--[ 4 - Why does NLP function?
|
||
|
|
||
|
In other words, NLP says that we programmed ourselves to react in a
|
||
|
certain way when exposed to certain events. To a hacker, this looks
|
||
|
as good as a remote kernel vulnerability with great chances of
|
||
|
exploitation. This means that we can trigger a certain reaction or
|
||
|
response from someone if we know the conditions (event) that would
|
||
|
normally lead that person to that reaction. Hey, wait.. Is this really
|
||
|
about controlling your peers??? Yes, someone can use NLP to take
|
||
|
advantage of "free mind", by simply tricking the mind into seeing false
|
||
|
conditions that would lead it to take a decision according to those
|
||
|
false conditions.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A common feature of all contemporary societies is the "guilt
|
||
|
syndrome". This arose from the "original sin" trick: you're a mere
|
||
|
mortal, who deserves to be hurt because a very long time ago, some
|
||
|
retard ate an apple. This "guilt syndrome" is a very dangerous trap
|
||
|
because it makes human beings prone to NLP, as they want to "pay the
|
||
|
dues" for their "sins". But .. wait .. what if there is no sin? You
|
||
|
mean.. I could make someone feel guilty of something he never did
|
||
|
just to make that person please me whenever I want? Yep.. that's
|
||
|
exactly WHY neuro-linguistic programming works in every case: human
|
||
|
beings don't want to look bad in the eyes of their peers, and most
|
||
|
important to those who are our models and/or mean something important
|
||
|
to us.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Mommy is feeling very sick today, but I'm sure that if you will
|
||
|
bring good grades from school I will be feeling better, son" -- this
|
||
|
is one classical example of how NLP functions. The "Mom" in our case
|
||
|
study is faking an illness to make her son study harder at school
|
||
|
and bring a good grade. In the "son's" mind, he will start feeling
|
||
|
guilty for his mother's illness, therefore he will force himself to
|
||
|
get a good grade, one way or another. In this example, NLP is not
|
||
|
doing bad to "son" as improving his grades is a good thing. But in
|
||
|
the same time, he didn't do what he wanted, instead he did what
|
||
|
someone else tricked him into doing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another example, one begger walks to your car window. She's an old
|
||
|
woman, with kind, warm eyes. She comes shyly and whispering, asks
|
||
|
you to give her money for medicines and food. You will give her
|
||
|
money because she looks a lot like your grandmother who you loved a
|
||
|
lot. And you want to help a less fortunate human-being. But, that
|
||
|
begger, after "work hours" is maybe richer than you because it took
|
||
|
advantage of the "grandmother figure" look. Most of the people have
|
||
|
a grandmother who raised them, took care of them when their parents
|
||
|
weren't around, and quite possibly have passed away. To honor her
|
||
|
memory, you relate to the "less fortunate grand mother" begging at
|
||
|
your car window, and you want to be of any help. Your good
|
||
|
intentions land you right in the "granny's" trap, just like a
|
||
|
carnivorous plant eats an insect.
|
||
|
|
||
|
These were only three examples how NLP works in day-to-day life, but
|
||
|
to someone aquinted to these techniques, the examples are endless.
|
||
|
Someone aware of NLP and how things work is controlling everybody
|
||
|
around them to obtain a certain result. Is it wrong to take
|
||
|
advantage of someone else's ignorance? Is it wrong to exploit a
|
||
|
vulnerability to a system if no one is able to catch you? Perhaps,
|
||
|
but I don't give a fuck.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
--[ 5 - What is reality - "What is above is what is beneath"
|
||
|
|
||
|
Words of Hermes seem cryptic to most of you looking at the sky and
|
||
|
seeing no similarity to earth. What Hermes actually meant was that
|
||
|
our Universe is a fractal; if you zoom on a fractal, you will notice
|
||
|
that the image you get is very similar to the initial image. This
|
||
|
means that the same Laws that built the fractal on the detail scale,
|
||
|
also built the fractal on the large scale.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Let's take a trip to the atom world. The diversity of chemical
|
||
|
elements present in our Universe is merely given by the number of
|
||
|
electrons orbitting each element's atom (and ofcourse, protons and
|
||
|
neutrons and other sub-atomic particles but that's beyond the scope
|
||
|
of this article). So.. what makes an element have more electrons
|
||
|
than another? The answer is simple, it's the electromagnetical
|
||
|
forces. Quantum mechanics identified 4 types of electromagnetical
|
||
|
forces: 2 strong and 2 weaker, resulting from a combination of first
|
||
|
two. But all these forces together create a quadripolar magnet. This
|
||
|
quadripolar magnet is the "blueprint" our world is made on. Each
|
||
|
element in the Mendeleev table has a unique combination of these 4
|
||
|
forces, this giving it's unicity.
|
||
|
|
||
|
So, you mean that our Universe is nothing but electromagnetical
|
||
|
forces combined at different layers, in different combinations and
|
||
|
amounts? Yes, exactly. Without electro-magnetism our Universe would
|
||
|
be an uniform mass of initial matter particles. This is what Einstein
|
||
|
theorized when he said about the 4th form of aggregation of matter,
|
||
|
at absolute zero (e.g. the absolute absence of electro-magnetism,
|
||
|
because heat is nothing but the result of the interaction between
|
||
|
electricity and magnetism).
|
||
|
|
||
|
This also means that, if you can determine the exact amount and
|
||
|
combination of electro-magnetical forces present in a certain
|
||
|
element's atomic structure, and replicate that exact combination and
|
||
|
amount to another element's atomic structure you would be able to
|
||
|
transform the second element into the first one, down to the
|
||
|
grittiest detail.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Remember the alchemists trying to make gold from dust? ;)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
--[ 6 - Human thoughts affecting reality
|
||
|
|
||
|
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
|
||
|
soul with evil."
|
||
|
-- Socrates
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is a huge number of cases when Initiates affected the world
|
||
|
around them and people were too amazed to understand the miracle.
|
||
|
Look at the fakhir's in India, or the buddhist monks of Tibet. There
|
||
|
are documented cases when yoga masters managed to purify water by
|
||
|
the power of meditation. So, how is this happening? Continue
|
||
|
reading..
|
||
|
|
||
|
Quantum mechanics brought to light a very interresting fact. The quantum
|
||
|
mechanics experiments are not consistent in time and over
|
||
|
researchers. It would appear that the observer's mind highly affects
|
||
|
the result of the experiment. It got to a point where, if the
|
||
|
scientist thinks his experiment will end up one way, then most
|
||
|
definetely, the experiment will. But as soon as another scientist
|
||
|
comes into place, with a different mind set and with less faith in
|
||
|
the success of the experiment, the experiment will give another
|
||
|
result. Therefore, scientists concluded that quantum mechanics
|
||
|
experiments are rarely conclusive.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Early twentieth-century experiments on the physics of very small-scale
|
||
|
phenomena led to the discovery of phenomena that could not be predicted
|
||
|
on the basis of classical physics, and to new models (theories) that
|
||
|
described and predicted very accurately those micro-scale phenomena so
|
||
|
recently discovered. These models of the real world being observed at
|
||
|
this micro scale, could not easily be reconciled with the way objects are
|
||
|
observed to behave on the macro scale of everyday life. The predictions
|
||
|
they offered often appeared counter-intuitive to observers. Indeed, they
|
||
|
touched off much consternation--even in the minds of their discoverers. The
|
||
|
Copenhagen interpretation consists of attempts to explain the experiments
|
||
|
and their mathematical formulations.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We like to think of our brain as a massive data storage for all the
|
||
|
experiences we had since our childhood, but is it?! There is no
|
||
|
actual evidence that data is stored in our brain, the only hard
|
||
|
evidence existing now is that our brains emit "waves".Our brain is
|
||
|
nothing but a big antenna, receiving/emitting electro-magnetical energy,
|
||
|
as waves. There are more types of brain waves, some are easy to measure
|
||
|
with instruments, most of them aren't. Our brains are nothing but
|
||
|
wide open wireless access points, emitting signal everywhere around
|
||
|
us and receiving signals from our environment. Err.. wait..
|
||
|
electro-magnetical brain waves??? WTF man.. But you said our
|
||
|
Universe is based on electro-magnetism.. If humans can emit
|
||
|
electro-magnetical energy this means that.. they can actually affect
|
||
|
reality? Yes, they do. But not all antennas have same signal
|
||
|
strength: some have stronger signal, some lesser. But all of them
|
||
|
modify reality according to what they think of reality; some modify
|
||
|
reality in a substantial way, that is actually noticeable and some
|
||
|
others, in a less perceptible way. But EVERY SPIRITUAL MIND (let it
|
||
|
be human, animal, floral or mineral) AFFECTS REALITY ACCORDING TO
|
||
|
WHAT THEY KNOW ABOUT REALITY AND WHAT THEY THINK REALITY SHOULD BE
|
||
|
LIKE. If you create an image in your mind, and believe in it
|
||
|
strongly and with passion, you will actually make it happen. No,
|
||
|
it's not esoteric stuff, it's very day-to-day stuff -- you don't say
|
||
|
any magic spell, you just figure out a way to make that image come
|
||
|
true. If you REALLY want something and WORK hard so that you DESERVE
|
||
|
that certain something, there are GREAT chances that the Universe
|
||
|
will grant you that something.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well, things aren't that easy, really, but simplified, that's how it
|
||
|
is. Perhaps, at some other time, maybe next Hacking Your Brain, I
|
||
|
will explain you how to make your wishes come true, and how those
|
||
|
wishes should look like so that they have greater chances of
|
||
|
happening.
|
||
|
|
||
|
YOU ARE THE CENTER OF YOUR OWN UNIVERSE. YOU ARE THE MASTERS OF YOUR
|
||
|
OWN UNIVERSE. BE TO YOUR OWN UNIVERSE WHAT GOD IS TO THE WHOLE
|
||
|
UNIVERSE AND TRY TO BE AS MUCH AS GOD AS YOU CAN. Oh, and one more
|
||
|
thing, if you think God is an old man with beard, then you're a
|
||
|
moron. I don't care how you call it, the God I speak of is beyond
|
||
|
any religion, being the MIND THAT CREATED THE PERFECTIONIST SYSTEM
|
||
|
WE CALL LIFE.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
7. How to create a hostile reality?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Well, who would create something that would hurt himself, you might
|
||
|
say. But, crazily enough, people actually do it without even being
|
||
|
aware of it. I will give you an extreme example, bare with it, but
|
||
|
it should give you an insight on how humans can be tricked into
|
||
|
doing bad to themselves.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Let's take a hypothetical case. Let's a consider a very esteemed
|
||
|
group of scientists whose research concluded that a small spoon of
|
||
|
crushed glass poured in your food will keep illness away. Ofcourse,
|
||
|
now you will say "hey everybody knows crushed glass will hurt you"
|
||
|
but let's assume you don't know that and, there will be a LOT of
|
||
|
people TRUSTING the scientist group enough to actually pour crushed
|
||
|
glass pieces into food. This will give you a VERY BAD STOMACHAL
|
||
|
problem but you would not dare to think that the scientists you
|
||
|
trust so much could be wrong. So you will think your stomachal pains
|
||
|
are of a different nature, or worse, you will think that the pain
|
||
|
comes from the crushed glass fighting the illness. So you will take
|
||
|
MORE crushed glass to make sure the illness is defeated for good.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Have you guys seen "Idiocracy"? It's a great movie -- and I took
|
||
|
this example from the movie. Our hero, Joe, is a semi-retarded
|
||
|
military who, by chance, makes a trip 500 years into the future
|
||
|
when he discovers that the crops are watered with a Gatorade-like
|
||
|
sports drink named "Brawndo", he finds himself knowledgeable enough
|
||
|
to correct the problem. The narrator comments that "Brawndo has
|
||
|
replaced water virtually every where" and that Brawndo purchased the
|
||
|
FDA and FCC. In response to the plan to correct the problem,
|
||
|
White House cabinet members continuously repeated the Brawndo tag line,
|
||
|
"Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes." Yet, no one
|
||
|
had a clue what electrolytes are. They just knew what they've been told.
|
||
|
This is a very good illustrated example of how people are most of the
|
||
|
times too trusting and ignorant for their own good. Ofcourse Brawndo
|
||
|
was bad for the crops, because the plants need water, not artificial
|
||
|
flavor -- but that artificial flavor beverage was keeping half the
|
||
|
country employed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
By following what trusted sources tell us is good without questioning
|
||
|
and thinking for ourselves, we become slaves of our own ignorance.
|
||
|
Ever since we are little, we rely on others to tell us what's good
|
||
|
or bad for us. First, there were the parents & family; later, our
|
||
|
trusted sources circle gets larger, including our friends and
|
||
|
colleagues. When we grow up, we also consider mass-media, internet
|
||
|
and press as trusted sources, because we are told they are reliable
|
||
|
sources that will never deceive us. BUT ALL THIS MENTALITY IS BASED
|
||
|
ON THE GOOD WILL AND INTENTIONS OF THE TRUSTED SOURCE; WHAT IF THE
|
||
|
TRUSTED SOURCE SLIGHTLY MODIFIES THE INFORMATION SENT TO US (just
|
||
|
like in NLP case studies), JUST TO TRIGGER A CERTAIN BEHAVIORAL
|
||
|
PATTERN FROM US?
|
||
|
|
||
|
The best example that comes to my mind is that of a imaginary hacker
|
||
|
character, let's call it The_C0nd0r, who breaks into one of the
|
||
|
largest telco in the country, without exploiting a single
|
||
|
vulnerability in the computer systems. You guessed it, it's the case
|
||
|
of the Master of Social Engineering. To be honest, I learnt about NLP
|
||
|
when i was studying social engineering. The trick with social
|
||
|
engineering is to make your peer STRONGLY BELIEVE into a fake reality
|
||
|
you are feeding him. You just need to make that "reality" as accurate
|
||
|
as possible so he doesn't realise it's a trick. And this is exactly
|
||
|
when NLP steps into place. First of all, you need to adopt a similar
|
||
|
posture to your target (not physical necessarily). For instance, if
|
||
|
you're targetting an employee, act as an employee who is in big trouble,
|
||
|
make him to be a part of your "drama". When people are confronted to
|
||
|
dramatic situations happening to others they usually think "oh, fuck this
|
||
|
could happen to me aswell" and they will give you that password.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I will give you an example again. Let's say, your best friend got
|
||
|
into a fight with another friend of yours. You trust your best
|
||
|
friend when he tells you that the other friend said bad words about
|
||
|
you, and he stood up to take your side. But, what if the things were
|
||
|
opposite? What if your best friend was the one saying bad things
|
||
|
about you and the other friend said he should stop talking of you
|
||
|
when you are not around? Your "natural" urge is to ally with your
|
||
|
best friend and "wage war" against the other friend, because you
|
||
|
trust a message from a trusted source that someone is doing wrong to
|
||
|
you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another example, on a larger scale now. There is a HUGE press
|
||
|
campaign against alimentary product X, saying that it highly affects
|
||
|
health, etc. People trust mass-media and, as a result of the
|
||
|
campaign, they stop using X. The company producing X is experiencing
|
||
|
big difficulties because their market share diminished a lot. You'll
|
||
|
say "Good! They were selling stuff affecting people's health, they
|
||
|
outta be put of business!" and I couldn't agree more. But.. there is
|
||
|
always a "but". What if there was a competitor for product X called
|
||
|
product Y. And the PR department of product Y contacted big
|
||
|
publications and tv networks owners and paid them a shit load of
|
||
|
money for this campaign. What if product X wouldn't actually be that
|
||
|
harmful, in fact, being less harmful than product Y? The market
|
||
|
share of the company producing X will diminish in the advantage of
|
||
|
the company producing Y. Even if company X publish a study stating
|
||
|
that their products are not as harmful as claimed, and even less
|
||
|
harmful than product Y, no one will trust the statement. If trust is
|
||
|
broken once, it will never reappear or if it does, it does with
|
||
|
great sacrifice.
|
||
|
|
||
|
And another fictionary example now. Let's assume hackers would exist
|
||
|
and they can hack (unlike kingcope;). Let's continue to assume
|
||
|
stuff. We also assume that this hacker (fictionary character,
|
||
|
remember?) is not a good guy working for the Man. Instead he's a
|
||
|
rebelious youngster (mid 20's) with the unique ability to break into
|
||
|
any computer system he puts his mind to. This hacker is aproached by
|
||
|
the owner of company A who is crushed under the competition of
|
||
|
company B, whose product is far superior and the distribution
|
||
|
network is by far, the largest. Let's assume the owner of A asks the
|
||
|
hacker if it would be possible to do something to company B. The
|
||
|
hacker would go unnoticed and mess with the client database, mix the
|
||
|
deliveries, steal secret info about the product, etc. In short,
|
||
|
anything that would give company A a competitive advantage.
|
||
|
Ofcourse, to the masses this would appear as company B is either
|
||
|
A) in big trouble, B) doing something nasty behind closed doors or
|
||
|
C) can't secure their shit right, and by extension can't secure
|
||
|
customer's trust either. Gosh, we're so lucky hackers only secure
|
||
|
our networks and iPod's instead of doing things so scary.
|
||
|
|
||
|
A real life example, this time, comes from the Middle East. During
|
||
|
the recent war between Israel and Lebanon, the Hamass posted on the
|
||
|
Internet images of crippled or killed children, dismembered, etc.
|
||
|
This ofcourse, had a huge impact on the international community and
|
||
|
a lot of countries and important people took position and asked
|
||
|
Israel to stop the war. But after all, it was just a good press
|
||
|
campaign organised by the Hamass, manipulating the media and the
|
||
|
society.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The point is that by EXPLOITING HUMAN BEING IGNORANCE AND CONFORT IN
|
||
|
TRUSTING WHAT THEY CONSIDER AS BEING "TRUSTED SOURCES", OR BY FAKING
|
||
|
A SOURCE MAKING IT LOOK TRUSTWORTHY, YOU CAN TRICK PEOPLE INTO
|
||
|
ACTING AGAINST THEMSELVES, AND SURPRISINGLY, BE HAPPY ABOUT IT.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- [ 8 - The chains remain
|
||
|
|
||
|
Slavery is long gone, most people think. Just because the chains
|
||
|
don't ring anymore as we walk, it doesn't mean they disappeared.
|
||
|
It's just that today chains have been more subtle and harder to
|
||
|
perceive. The society, through its members, or mass-media, or tv
|
||
|
networks, books, religion, banking system and it's loans, and so on,
|
||
|
EVERYTHING is keeping us bonded to these chains we hate so much. By
|
||
|
telling us how we should behave in certain conditions because that's
|
||
|
"normal", by feeding us distorted information aimed to harden the
|
||
|
concept of "normal" and "what we should do", by creating fake needs,
|
||
|
desires and dreams we become addicted to the society and less aware
|
||
|
of our real selves.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The society is feeding you models, driving expensive cars, living in
|
||
|
big houses, living the good life, you know. Automatically, in your
|
||
|
mind you start to want the same (because society taught us that
|
||
|
second place is for the losers), so you get deeper into it. You
|
||
|
contract a loan from the bank just to get a bigger house, or a
|
||
|
faster car. You start to work extra-hours just to impress your boss
|
||
|
enough to promote you: a promotion would allow you to buy more
|
||
|
things. You start stealing stuff because you don't see another mean
|
||
|
of getting the money you WANT. Unknowingly, you become bonded to the
|
||
|
system, without the possibility of escaping from it. You become a
|
||
|
slave of your work/bank just to satisfy your NEEDS. But these are
|
||
|
not real needs, instead it's what your TRUSTED SOURCES told you you
|
||
|
need.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you want to break loose of the chains holding you down, you need
|
||
|
to ACCEPT. You need to accept what is happening to you, either it
|
||
|
being "good" or "bad". The Universe and Its Laws don't think in
|
||
|
terms of duality, but Unicity. You need to understand that
|
||
|
EVERYTHING HAPPENING TO YOU IS THE RESULT OF YOUR PREVIOUS ACTIONS
|
||
|
AND THAT YOU ONLY GOT HERE WHERE YOU ARE AS A RESULT OF YOUR
|
||
|
CHOICES. You need to understand that TO OBTAIN SOMETHING FIRST YOU
|
||
|
MUST DESERVE that thing and that there are no shortcuts in life.
|
||
|
|
||
|
"Any competition is the entertainment of the rulers at the expense
|
||
|
of the slaves"
|
||
|
|
||
|
--[ 9 - Greetz
|
||
|
|
||
|
t3kn10n of Ac1dB1tch3z, zf0 ppl, spender for being the greatest
|
||
|
and whitest whitehat of all times, kevin mitnick for being owned so
|
||
|
many times using the social engineering skills himself pioneered,
|
||
|
king cope for not being able to find a bug on himself but instead
|
||
|
using "hack your mind" tricks to use other people's bugs/codes in
|
||
|
his exploit codes, Jesus Christ, Hermes, Socrate and finally, my
|
||
|
mentor, Pythagoras
|
||
|
|