mirror of
https://github.com/fdiskyou/Zines.git
synced 2025-03-09 00:00:00 +01:00
1341 lines
44 KiB
Text
1341 lines
44 KiB
Text
==Phrack Inc.==
|
||
|
||
Volume Two, Issue 20, File 7 of 12
|
||
|
||
|
||
Metal Shop Private's -- Phreak/Hack Sub
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
||
This subboard contained all technical questions and conversations about
|
||
phreaking and hacking. If something was illegal on it (occasionally some idiot
|
||
would post codes and then soon after be deleted), it was removed as soon as I
|
||
saw it.
|
||
|
||
|
||
1/70: Red Box......
|
||
Name: The Disk Jockey 13
|
||
Date: 4:24 am Sun Apr 26, 1987
|
||
|
||
Back at the private school I went to, everyone lived pretty much out of state,
|
||
and would always be calling their girlfriends back at home, thus making a
|
||
pretty big investment into the local payphones. After reading the files on
|
||
how a red box worked, took my little dictation recorder and went to a payphone
|
||
and found that I could record the tones that were made when you dropped
|
||
quarters in. I recorded about $4 worth of quarters, and it worked great.
|
||
Every time the computerized voice would say "Please deposit $1.70 for the past
|
||
5 minutes" you could just play the tape via a pair of sony walkman headphones
|
||
into the mouthpiece, and the phone would think that you deposited money in it.
|
||
It was pretty neat back then (several years ago.....) but every now and then
|
||
you would get the regular operator on instead of that synthasized voice.
|
||
|
||
|
||
-The Disk Jockey
|
||
|
||
Yes, not really important, but I saw "red box" in that last message and it
|
||
reminded me of that. Those were the days when there were lots of extenders
|
||
with 3 and 4 digit codes, and PBX's with NO codes.....
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
2/70: Since
|
||
Name: The Leftist 71
|
||
Date: 5:26 am Mon Apr 27, 1987
|
||
|
||
Since non-sup seems to be popular these days
|
||
404-289-0000-0009 test recordings, non-supd.. I beleive 0004 is deposit coin..
|
||
anyway, these are fun to forward to when you dont want people to be able to
|
||
reach you..
|
||
Ltist
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
3/70: Teleco numbers
|
||
Name: Mad Hatter 51
|
||
Date: 5:36 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
|
||
|
||
Would most(all) of the Teleco numbers(i.e. 99xx series) be non-suped? That
|
||
would seem at semi-logical atleast, eh?
|
||
|
||
-Hatter
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
4/70: Tuning Fork
|
||
Name: Knight Lightning 2
|
||
Date: 7:34 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
|
||
|
||
How succesful would you be if you tried to use a tuning fork to simulate 2600
|
||
Hertz? And if so, what would be good to use for MF? Fun, no? Heh!
|
||
|
||
Also, what does anyone know about the 508 NPA.
|
||
|
||
:Knight Lightning
|
||
|
||
|
||
5/70: Supvision Xlation
|
||
Name: Doom Prophet 21
|
||
Date: 10:13 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
|
||
|
||
The best way to box is to pull a cat's tail after making a call, then get a
|
||
rubber band and twang it in your teeth like Snoopy for MF.
|
||
|
||
Since we were talking about supervision a little bit, I went through some
|
||
stuff I had on translations. What I think makes a number unsupervised (besies
|
||
the fact that there is no return of supervision, or reverse battery
|
||
signalling) is the charging translation in the terminating office. The
|
||
screening code of a chart class (charges and route are determined by the chart
|
||
class I believe) that denotes the call charge type would register to not make
|
||
either a detailed or bulk AMA entry at the toll office (if the number is 1+
|
||
for someone), since it as if the number never answered. A 'detailed' AMA entry
|
||
shows the calling and called numbers, whereas a bulk AMA entry shows only the
|
||
calling number.
|
||
|
||
Something else about translations, it doesn't mean an 800 to POTS or special
|
||
BTN when people talk about ESS translations, but the information on particular
|
||
Directory Numbers that finds and identifies the line equipment of the called
|
||
number (calling also I believe) that would provide any special info that is
|
||
needed by the switch to process the call, for example, whether a call is
|
||
coming from one or two party lines, or whether it is a four party line with
|
||
full selective ringing (which can't be tested by MLT equipment which is why I
|
||
remember it). If no translation influenced the way the call is processed, then
|
||
how would the switch know to route tthe calling party to an operator for ONI
|
||
if the calling line was more than two party (with the specifications talkd
|
||
about earlier about the R and T leads status determining the billing also
|
||
taken into consideration).
|
||
|
||
Anyway, this post is basically correct but if anyone finds any errors then
|
||
please correct me.
|
||
|
||
Doom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
6/70: Things
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 10:41 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
|
||
|
||
Well, RC's on an ESS are called translations too, at least when done by an
|
||
RC-MAC clerk. RC data involving a line that is changed can be called
|
||
translations. Don't ask me why this is so, but it's what I've heard.
|
||
|
||
Does anyone here know what an ANIF-7 is? As far as I can tell, it is an ANI
|
||
failure to TSPS, but that's all I know about it...it can probably happen
|
||
anytime, but I do know that it was a specific problem with an early 5ESS
|
||
generic.
|
||
|
||
Oh yeah, another unsuped signusoid is at (618)235+0090..this was found by
|
||
Syntax Error a long time ago. A neat thing about these 'tone sweeps' is that
|
||
if you call through an OCC that uses an OUTWATS line that is set up on an
|
||
inband signalling trunk, the OUTWATS linne will be trunked from the other end.
|
||
This happens as the tone gets near 2600Hz, but it is more sensitive on an OCC
|
||
switch, as something like 2710 and 2500 will also reset or trunk their
|
||
equipment, or at least that's what I've found.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
7/70: FALFALAFL
|
||
Name: Taran King 1
|
||
Date: 11:01 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987
|
||
|
||
I'd like to congradulate Doom Prophet on his extremely witty response to KL's
|
||
absolutely out-of-place post. REFRAIN
|
||
|
||
Question...Most test numbers are unsuped, but I have at least one tone sweep
|
||
that I can think of off-hand that is suped. What would be the purpose either
|
||
way? Later
|
||
-TK
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
8/70: repair number
|
||
Name: The Scanner 20
|
||
Date: 2:34 pm Tue Apr 28, 1987
|
||
|
||
Would the repair number used for a payphone be the same as a residence repair
|
||
number? Also, Doesnt the place that houses the phone (say a gas station) don't
|
||
they get a cut of the profits from the phone? If they do,
|
||
wouldnt they have the repair number?
|
||
|
||
_-The Scanner
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
9/70: 2 Q's
|
||
Name: Circuit Breaker 5
|
||
Date: 12:11 pm Wed Apr 29, 1987
|
||
|
||
Why are there PBXs that give a loud tone before the code. And does anyone
|
||
know what the difference is between the ANI-D jack and regular ANI is?
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
10/70: Red-boxing
|
||
Name: Icarus 15
|
||
Date: 11:32 am Thu Apr 30, 1987
|
||
|
||
I saw before that someone mentioned that the amount of money entered into a
|
||
payphone of some kind is not kept track of. If this is true then it would
|
||
seem impossible for MA DUMBELL to ever catch on to red-boxing. That is if
|
||
AT&T phones don't have a money counter in them. TK-When the money was
|
||
collected from the payphone, did you notice whether he had the amount of money
|
||
that was "supposed" to be in there? Or whether he even checked it?
|
||
|
||
If the money is counted then it is possible that the person who collects the
|
||
coins would get in trouble for not reporting all the money that was
|
||
registered. The money not being there because of redboxing.
|
||
|
||
It is also possible to red box off of blue AT&T payphones (without a money
|
||
slot). I am curious whether that can EVER be found out, since there is no
|
||
money counter (obviously) to check.
|
||
|
||
Icarus
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
11/70: Well...
|
||
Name: Taran King 1
|
||
Date: 2:41 pm Thu Apr 30, 1987
|
||
|
||
Next time I see the guy there, I'll ask him, but I did see him write a few
|
||
things down. None that I could decipher meant anything related to money so
|
||
I'm not sure if there was a counter in it. I'll have to check it out though
|
||
-TK
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
12/70: Payfone Mutin
|
||
Name: Jester Sluggo 31
|
||
Date: 6:49 pm Thu Apr 30, 1987
|
||
|
||
That was supposed to be "Payfone Muting".
|
||
|
||
In anycase, on most new payfones, they have what is called "Muting"
|
||
which "mutes"-out any red box tones from entering through the Mouthpiece.
|
||
Those new non-coin-slot payfones should have those, but I've never tried.
|
||
|
||
/
|
||
\
|
||
/ luggo !!
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
13/70: DNR/Pen Registers
|
||
Name: Knight Lightning 2
|
||
Date: 7:04 pm Thu Apr 30, 1987
|
||
|
||
Are there any noticable effects from having one of these on your line? Static,
|
||
a low hum in the background, or line noise where there shouldn't be?
|
||
|
||
:Knight Lightning
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
14/70: well...
|
||
Name: Lucifer 666 43
|
||
Date: 7:40 pm Thu Apr 30, 1987
|
||
|
||
about the tuning fork...it does work.. i've used a harmonica..
|
||
|
||
also, how exactly do the bandwiths switch in multiplexing...
|
||
|
||
L666
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
15/70: From what I've heard
|
||
Name: The Scanner 20
|
||
Date: 8:30 am Fri May 01, 1987
|
||
|
||
That there isnt any way to detect a Pen register. No humm, buzz, or any thing
|
||
else. But hey, what do I know?
|
||
Dont answer that.
|
||
|
||
Anyway, 2 more questions,
|
||
|
||
Im sure momma bell knows all about red box tones and stuff like that. But,
|
||
what about those independent co's that make pay telephones and just kinda hook
|
||
them up to normal lines in stores and stuff. Wouldnt they be easy to box off
|
||
of or do they work in a different way altogether? Well, that was only one but
|
||
an answer is appreciated.
|
||
_-The Scanner
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
16/70: 'Round here...
|
||
Name: Taran King 1
|
||
Date: 2:41 pm Fri May 01, 1987
|
||
|
||
In this region, you can't just play the tones into the mouthpiece and get cred
|
||
(credit) for whatever you've played into the phone...you CAN, though, dial a
|
||
long distance number, it will then say, "Please deposit $x.xx". You put in
|
||
(play the tones for) the money and it says something like, "Thank you for
|
||
using AT&T." Ta da
|
||
-TK
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
17/70: Muxing, Etc
|
||
Name: Doom Prophet 21
|
||
Date: 4:56 pm Fri May 01, 1987
|
||
|
||
Lucifer, I think what you mean about the bandwidths changing in Multiplexing,
|
||
you are referring to voice frequency bandwidths. Multiplexing is just a method
|
||
of sending more than one converstation down the same transmission path. In
|
||
analog and older switches the method is called Frequency Division
|
||
Multiplexing, or FDM, when the signals are seperated on basis of frequency, as
|
||
opposed to newer switches which do it on a Time division basis (TDM). There's
|
||
also something called Space DM but I don't think it has a whole lot to do with
|
||
telephones (maybe stuff like digital Xmission). But anyway, a normal VF voice
|
||
bandwidth goes from 300 to 3000 Hz which is SF in band, although the VF
|
||
channel goes from 0 to 4000 Hz. Anything above 3000 is out of band signalling
|
||
(like 3700 Hz). CCIS uses a seperate nettwork composed of STP's and varioius
|
||
links and channels for independent signalling methods.
|
||
|
||
About the red boxing, the circuits that keep track of the coins that have been
|
||
entered are called Coin Detection & Announcement circuits (if the fortress is
|
||
in an ACTS serving area), which are a part of the Station Signalling
|
||
Announcement Subsystem which work out of local offices and in conjunction with
|
||
TSPS (not TOPS as far as I have seenn, a flash of the switchook anytime
|
||
during the initial charge announcements and an operator is connected. Playing
|
||
the tones to a live operator wouldn't be a good idea as they can obviously
|
||
tell the difference.
|
||
|
||
Something else, there was a little discussion about AMA and all (isn't there
|
||
everywhere?) a while back. The way a local office (LAMA) would keep track of
|
||
the billing data is to use a few AMA circuits (there are always two, AMA0 and
|
||
AMA1 but can be more for big offices) that reverse positions (from an active
|
||
to standby mode at midnight when the datta in the buffer is recorded onto the
|
||
actual tapes). So the AMARC computers can format the data to where it is
|
||
recognnized by the RAO, the tapes have to be specially customized for that
|
||
particular officere. A header label on the tape (put on at the beginning of
|
||
each new tape entry (12)) tells the originating NPA, the office number, date
|
||
and tape transport dates. A tape trailer is added on at the end of the tape
|
||
entry for that day, which has the info about how many total calls were AMA
|
||
recorded. The tape mark is some digit (?) that tells the RAO that the useful
|
||
info (that they need to look at) is ended. The billing data itself is in a
|
||
binary coded decimal form (0's and 1's) along with check and dummy codes. A
|
||
noncheck dummy code fills the spaces on the tape to signigy that there wasn't
|
||
a problem, but the space is supposed tobe there. A check dummy code is because
|
||
the info wasn't received or sent from the Peripheral Adress bus or from the
|
||
originating register into the charge buffer. If you ever come across AMA
|
||
records (like in the call store section of SCCS) it won't look like anything
|
||
that can determine billing (AMARC and RAO do that). They aren't too hard to
|
||
read though, just takes a while.
|
||
|
||
Doom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Read:(1-70,^17),T,R,Q,P,A,? :
|
||
|
||
|
||
18/70: Correction
|
||
Name: Doom Prophet 21
|
||
Date: 5:52 pm Fri May 01, 1987
|
||
|
||
Damn, what I got that I thought was some type of AMA records are not AMA
|
||
records (I think), so that means that I haven't been reading AMA records.
|
||
Shit, that's something that I want to do. Have to get some.
|
||
|
||
Doom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
19/70: well...
|
||
Name: Sir Francis Drake 56
|
||
Date: 8:15 pm Fri May 01, 1987
|
||
|
||
You mentioned the third time of multiplexing as Stad DM or something, I
|
||
believe what you mean is Stattistcal Time Division (STDM). A STDM is just
|
||
a normal TDM improved so that empty bandwiths (which occur on TDM) are used
|
||
by busy ones. This allows a hell of alot more efficient use of the line then
|
||
TDM's. STDM is mainly used when you have alot of terminals/whatever that
|
||
wont always be being used.
|
||
|
||
Hmm, I have some good stuff on pay phone accounting somewhere....
|
||
|
||
sfd
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
20/70: Payf0nez
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 10:57 pm Sat May 02, 1987
|
||
|
||
There are some types of payphones that are attached to a normal cable pair,
|
||
a normal line, and in this case the payphone like usage would be determined in
|
||
the phone and not in an office. I can't remember the exact type, or even where
|
||
I read it but if I should find it by any chance then I'll put it p.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
21/70: P-Phones
|
||
Name: Jester Sluggo 31
|
||
Date: 12:19 pm Sun May 03, 1987
|
||
|
||
Well, there are several manufacturers of payfones that make several different
|
||
type of payfones. If someone could call up the factory, or a salesman, or
|
||
dealer of these products, and pose as a perspective buyer, then that'd solve
|
||
these questions.. (shit..)
|
||
It perhaps might make a good file for Phrack. But I don't have the time do
|
||
to do those things.)
|
||
|
||
/
|
||
\
|
||
/ luggo !!
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
22/70: AMA
|
||
Name: Circuit Breaker 5
|
||
Date: 10:43 pm Sun May 03, 1987
|
||
|
||
There is some AMA info on LMOS. The audit file is under /dev/smlog /smlog.
|
||
|
||
I got a list for two different streams ST1 and ST2. You should see,
|
||
office id
|
||
days until expiration
|
||
process start time
|
||
stop time
|
||
the ama default
|
||
ama teleprocessing
|
||
its also will have some stuff such as HOC password and a backup HOC password,
|
||
Also look under /dev/unixabf /unixa/users, this will give you the termination
|
||
codes after the stream code like:
|
||
S# (#)=termination code + date + time
|
||
|
||
Circuit Breaker
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
23/70: audit file
|
||
Name: Circuit Breaker 5
|
||
Date: 10:49 pm Sun May 03, 1987
|
||
|
||
One more thing to check on the audit file dump /no5text/rcv/aimrc.
|
||
I would think the audit file is like audit on a VAX it just checks your access
|
||
level if your insuficient you can't read that file.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
24/70: Circuit Breaker
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 1:11 am Mon May 04, 1987
|
||
|
||
(Trying hard to leave an intelligble post)
|
||
|
||
Circuit Breaker, what LMOS system do you have access to? Do you (it looks
|
||
like it to me) have access to only the unix Front End system, or do you have
|
||
the IBM VM370 host processor? Anyway, not all front ends are the same, try
|
||
accessing the Cross Front End (XFE) via the Network Manager program
|
||
(/usr/lbin, I think) nmx or the NMstatus program and checking for those
|
||
specific files you posted about. I'll have to check the LMOS I have access to
|
||
and see if those particular files you posted about exist. You also might want
|
||
to look at the CRSAB RSA's help files for asyncronous terminal connections in
|
||
the help directories. You are probably already good at unix, but try this to
|
||
locate those help dirs:
|
||
|
||
$ cd /
|
||
$ du *>/dev/du.txt&
|
||
|
||
Then in a few minutes, do
|
||
|
||
$ cd /dev
|
||
$ cat du.txt
|
||
|
||
|
||
That will give you a listing of all the directories on that system, and if
|
||
you see any that resemble help files then go there and cat everything...
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
25/70: Payphones (again)
|
||
Name: Icarus 15
|
||
Date: 3:08 am Mon May 04, 1987
|
||
|
||
If the wires are exposed leading up to the payphone, and you hooked up handset
|
||
to the appropriate wires, can you make direct calls? If the case is that you
|
||
can, there are many phones I know of that do not have the metal encasing
|
||
around the wires. I have to try it. I am pretty sure that bypassing the
|
||
simple hardware of the payphone console itself does not grant open access to
|
||
all outside lines. Or does it?
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
26/70: LMOS/Unix
|
||
Name: Evil Jay 26
|
||
Date: 4:18 am Mon May 04, 1987
|
||
|
||
Could someone print out some commands to do on LMOS? What exactly can
|
||
be done on the system. Please explain. Also, how do you turn off the log
|
||
when logging into a Unix, and if possible, could someone leave me a C prg
|
||
to give my account root priveledges. Terminus was playing around, and
|
||
letting me check out one of these prgs but I never got a chance to save/copy
|
||
it. Thanks/...
|
||
|
||
-Jay
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
27/70: Payphone Wires.....
|
||
Name: The Disk Jockey 13
|
||
Date: 7:33 am Mon May 04, 1987
|
||
|
||
At the school in Indiana that I went to, there were tunnels that connected
|
||
every building in the school together and dated back to the early 1900's, so
|
||
we would get drunk and cruise down there and check out old crap that you find
|
||
laying around in the basements that some of these tunnels went to.
|
||
|
||
ANYWAYS, in one of these tunnels there was a HUGE phone block with hundreds
|
||
of cable pair. I brought the dandy test-set one night and started trying
|
||
different connectors to get a dialtone. When I did get a dialtone, I tried to
|
||
dial a local number, only to get a "please deposit 20 cents" recording, so my
|
||
guess from that experiance would be that the phone doesn't make much of a
|
||
difference, and that you would NOT be able to dial direct calls on it.
|
||
|
||
I have a driver's license that says I'm like 24, and I look it, so I too can
|
||
buy for any who need it. Michigan licenses are the easiest to change, just as
|
||
(ask) any Michigan person who was born in 1967.
|
||
|
||
|
||
-The Disk Jockey
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
28/70: Fortresses/LMOS commands
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 7:22 pm Mon May 04, 1987
|
||
|
||
Come to think of it, it is the actual line and not the phone in most cases,
|
||
take a look at the Class of Service or Universal Service Order Code in an ISVH
|
||
(ISH) or an INQ from COSMOS or get it via an Basic Output Report (BOR). Now,
|
||
if you really wanted to go out of your way to 'fix' a payphone to where you
|
||
could dial out normally, you might be able to accomplish this via RC-MAC, or
|
||
maybe an SCC. But if you did do this it would almost certainly die when the
|
||
bill came.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
PS-I will post up pertinent data from an ISH upon various payphones next time
|
||
I log on, if anyone would like to see it.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
29/70: Payphone ISH
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 7:43 pm Mon May 04, 1987
|
||
|
||
Ok, I ISHed a few payphones and here's the results:
|
||
|
||
The STatus was (of course) WK (Working), the TYPE was C (Coin), the Class of
|
||
Service (CS) is CN (CoiN), the Universal Service Order Code (US) is 1PC, which
|
||
means single party something.. can't remember. The Line Class Code (LCC) field
|
||
contained CDF, I don't know what CDF means though.
|
||
|
||
On older post-pay telephones (the kind where it either gives you a loud
|
||
annoying 'buzz' when the calling party answers, or the kind that allows you to
|
||
hear them but them not hear you until you put your coins in) probably have a
|
||
US of 1PP (Single party, Post Pay), and Coin First phones (the kind that you
|
||
must put money in to get a dialtone) have a US of 1CF (Single party, Coin
|
||
First).
|
||
|
||
Hope that helped,
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
30/70: Question
|
||
Name: Cap'N Crax 10
|
||
Date: 3:43 am Tue May 05, 1987
|
||
|
||
Does anyone know why, and how, it
|
||
is allowable to place collect calls
|
||
to loop lines. I know that this
|
||
does work, as I have done it. I
|
||
was wondering how it (loop) is
|
||
classified, why it passes the billing
|
||
verify, and to whom is the billing
|
||
allocated? It is obviously recorded
|
||
on AMA, and it apparently pissed
|
||
off Bell. No more loop...
|
||
|
||
C^2
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
31/70: --------
|
||
Name: Circuit Breaker 5
|
||
Date: 10:25 pm Tue May 05, 1987
|
||
|
||
Phantom what do you mean 'trying for an inteligible post'? I was telling Doom
|
||
how to get some AMA data from LMOS. I am sure the LMOS you have access to has
|
||
an AMA audit file, its just a security feature.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
32/70: Call Blocking....
|
||
Name: The Mad Hacker 47
|
||
Date: 7:06 pm Wed May 06, 1987
|
||
|
||
What Is Call Blocking? It has something to do with a condition in ANI/ONI. I
|
||
read it in My Cama Manual and It was vague. Any Help?
|
||
|
||
-TMH
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
33/70: A few LMOS commands
|
||
Name: Control C 8
|
||
Date: 8:46 pm Wed May 06, 1987
|
||
|
||
Here's some /FOR commands
|
||
|
||
TV - Trouble Verification
|
||
RJR and DMLR are jepordary reports..
|
||
|
||
Shit I had some more, but I can't rember..
|
||
|
||
Control
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
34/70: datakits...
|
||
Name: Slave Driver 58
|
||
Date: 11:56 am Thu May 07, 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
Does anyone have any experience
|
||
hacking datakits?
|
||
|
||
NODE dkeasta blah blah
|
||
|
||
NETWORK ACCESS PASSWORD:
|
||
|
||
any ideas on the password? Anyone have -any- idea of the format, length etc?
|
||
|
||
any help appreciated..
|
||
|
||
Steve Driver
|
||
|
||
ps. I know what they do, I just need to get on famous last words|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
35/70: More LMOS
|
||
Name: Doom Prophet 21
|
||
Date: 8:28 pm Thu May 07, 1987
|
||
|
||
Ok, I hadn't seen that in LMOS yet, CB, thanks for the info. There are other
|
||
ways to access the info in an intermediate call store section/buffer of sorts
|
||
from SCCS, and of course the AMARC systems. On another board, Phantom asked
|
||
what AMASE was, I would think that it could be an abbreviated form of 'AMA
|
||
Sensor', you know, BDT's, CDA's, and ESS software format sensors, or special
|
||
VSS sensors maybe.
|
||
|
||
On LMOS..some of the things are common knowledge (in BSTJ's and all) but I
|
||
will post a few and what they do.
|
||
|
||
Let's see, to screen status troubles, ttry /FOR MSCR. You may have to know
|
||
employee codes of the screener and the MC code, it's been a while since I've
|
||
been on.
|
||
|
||
The different actions in the Mechanized Screener transactions are run an MLT
|
||
test, get job and work info, run RST transaction, read mail, clear the mask
|
||
(indicating no action), review desk items, return to original status, put item
|
||
on the Local Test Desk (used to test lines that the MLT/LTS equipment can't
|
||
for some reason, such as selective ringing multiparty lines), put screener in
|
||
the off duty status (returning work items into the pool I believe). Others are
|
||
/Te (Trouble Entry), DISP, etc.
|
||
|
||
Something somewhat interesting, in the /tmp direcoty for an FE, look at the
|
||
Console/log0 file, which contains countters and info on how many certain
|
||
transactions have been done for a certain time period (RBOR is in there but
|
||
I'm not sure about the rest). Other commands do things like add changes to
|
||
LMOS tables, look at work summaries, check all jobs related to a certain CTTN
|
||
(cable trouble ticket number) or TTN, and review all work items for specific
|
||
FE's. If anyone wants anything specific about some of these commands leave ma
|
||
(me) a letter or post since it seems the discussion is going good. I'm sure
|
||
Marauder or others could proably correct me on a few points, but oh well.
|
||
|
||
Doom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
36/70: Call Blocking/Loops/etc.
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 11:09 pm Thu May 07, 1987
|
||
|
||
Circuit Breaker, what I meant was that I was fucked up, and having a hard
|
||
time typing legibly. That's all.
|
||
|
||
Call blocking is a vague term, can you tell us what it relates to, CAMA,
|
||
ANI, PBX's, or what? A basic description is that it is what happens when the
|
||
network is operating at peak, and all trunks are busy, and thus the caller
|
||
gets a re-order or is left sitting there.
|
||
|
||
Be more specific if you can, because there is also a thing called 'blocking'
|
||
on PBX's which is similar but on a smaller scale.
|
||
|
||
To whoever asked about the collect call to the loop, well loop-around
|
||
numbers are probably either an Official or a Test line, at least the ones I
|
||
have seen. So unless they set some type of screening to it so it can't accept
|
||
collect calls then you could collect call a loop, but hope that you didn't
|
||
dial direct from your home because your number would be on their phone bill.
|
||
|
||
Control C, since you seem to have a manual or something on ESS, could you
|
||
tell me what a RC15 report is, I am very confused about them. Thanks...
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
37/70: Coin Tests...
|
||
Name: The Mad Hacker 47
|
||
Date: 12:07 am Fri May 08, 1987
|
||
|
||
SFD posted in the previous sub abour coin tests. I ask you this. The CO, upon
|
||
completion of a call, removes -48 volts from the ring, ground from the tip and
|
||
either a -130 volts(Refund) or +130 Volts(Collect) is applied to the tip to
|
||
operate the cion relay in the phone. If Someone were to have acces to the
|
||
exposed wires outside of the phone, wouldn't they be able to simulate the
|
||
voltage necessary to refund their own money(Theoretically speaking if they
|
||
could simulate the voltage in a Phone Booth of course)? Would that Be
|
||
Possible? I also broke out my testboard, Station, and network Manuals and
|
||
Found that their is some significance in turning the handset of the payphone
|
||
upside down. I can't find out exactly why yet, but it is all over the "Coin
|
||
Maintenance Check Booklet" that bell uses as reference for Coin Stations. I
|
||
will search more through the book and see what I can find.
|
||
|
||
The Mad Hacker
|
||
|
||
|
||
38/70: Collect call
|
||
Name: Icarus 15
|
||
Date: 12:52 am Fri May 08, 1987
|
||
|
||
If you hack a mailphone system of some kind that only requires the number to
|
||
be called and the initia message will be played, then you can have the message
|
||
say, "Hello?........Sure. hangup|" This will enable you to make a third party
|
||
billing call to anyone and use the mailphone system as the party paying for
|
||
the call. The operator will cal up the mailphone, the msg will play and
|
||
she'll hear the person being billed say, "Sure." when asked if they accept the
|
||
charge.
|
||
|
||
In any case if you want to make a call bill it to 312-410-7132, and it will go
|
||
straight through.
|
||
|
||
Icarus
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
39/70: Call blocking
|
||
Name: Lotus 38
|
||
Date: 3:44 am Fri May 08, 1987
|
||
|
||
I know that in parts of Florida that a new system uses the term "call
|
||
blocking" simply to stop someone in your co's area from calling you. You would
|
||
do something like "*80+number to block" and when that number calls you , a
|
||
"You can not dial XXX-XXXX at this time. Try again later"
|
||
|
||
Other features include immediate call back. This allows you to hit a few
|
||
keys on the phone and call back whomever just called you (again, only if
|
||
they are in your local co).
|
||
|
||
Anyone else have info on this?
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
40/70: Collect Calls.....
|
||
Name: The Disk Jockey 13
|
||
Date: 6:55 am Fri May 08, 1987
|
||
|
||
A few years ago, in school (out of state) everyone had their ways making free
|
||
calls, someone had a number to a recording, something like that VMS, and it
|
||
said "This number accepts all collect and 3rd party billing calls" and it
|
||
worked all the time.
|
||
|
||
Another way is to make a collect call to an out-of-state extender. Let me say
|
||
it this way....
|
||
|
||
I'm calling from 219 (Indiana) and I call the local MCI node in Chicago
|
||
collect. The operator asks "your name" and you say in a fem voice
|
||
"Brenda"....the call will go through, and you will here the usual MCI tone.
|
||
RIGHT AWAY, you press a number on t touch tone pad, this will silent the MCI
|
||
tone. Then you say in your own voice "Hello?" for all the operator knows,
|
||
you are the one that answered! The only problem is that you have to work
|
||
fast, else you get a re-order in about 15 seconds.
|
||
|
||
-The Disk Jockey
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
41/70: Call Blocking...
|
||
Name: The Mad Hacker 47
|
||
Date: 9:19 am Fri May 08, 1987
|
||
|
||
I will get more specific on the Call Blocking I am refering to. It isn't what
|
||
Lotus suggested. That Sounds more like DMS-100 Options(Sounds Exactly like
|
||
them, in fact). I thought that the FCC wouldn't allow AT&T to use those
|
||
options, though. Maybe I was mistaken. I think that the call blocking I was
|
||
refering to is more towards the overload on any paticular circuit as was
|
||
mentioned before.
|
||
|
||
The Mad Hacker
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
42/70: toll phone
|
||
Name: Circuit Breaker 5
|
||
Date: 10:46 pm Fri May 08, 1987
|
||
|
||
In most areas in Europe, the wire to payphones hang out below the phone if you
|
||
splice those wires to you handset, you can dial direct without any imitation
|
||
tones.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
43/70: Call Blocking
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 2:23 am Sat May 09, 1987
|
||
|
||
Call Blocking is indeed a feature of (C)LASS....but that CLASS feature is
|
||
LATA based around LCCIS, not upon a CO and intraoffice calls. For more info
|
||
read any CLASS file, or check out LOD/H TJ 1, file 1, CLASS, by Videosmith.
|
||
It explains it pretty clearly. There was a PBX test number in 305 (the testing
|
||
grounds of CLASS) that I had gotten somewhere that had a demo of CLASS
|
||
features on it, such as Call trace, selective call forwarding, call blocking,
|
||
etc. It was called Touch-Star, I think, or maybe Touch-Tel, one of the two.
|
||
Anyway, LASS is used in the 717 (Harrisburg, PA) NPA.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
44/70: Addition.
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 2:32 am Sat May 09, 1987
|
||
|
||
(I forgot something)
|
||
|
||
DMS-100 does have something like it's own call blocking. It can be used to
|
||
restrict certain types of lines from calling other types. The destination
|
||
switch checks the information sent in from the (intraoffice) DN, (I think the
|
||
Screening Code, probably) or from an INC (incoming trunk). This can be done to
|
||
restrict access to official lines and such.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
45/70: i thought
|
||
Name: Lucifer 666 43
|
||
Date: 2:26 am Sun May 10, 1987
|
||
|
||
none of the DMS features blocking other people from calling you, etc| were
|
||
not implemented.... I thought that the user-choice stuff was never put in...
|
||
|
||
was I wrong?
|
||
|
||
L666
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
46/70: RC15?
|
||
Name: Control C 8
|
||
Date: 11:17 am Sun May 10, 1987
|
||
|
||
Phantom,
|
||
|
||
Are you sure the RC15 exists? RC's start at 16 and end at 29..
|
||
Maby I'm just screwed...
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
47/70: FACS
|
||
Name: Mad Hatter 51
|
||
Date: 5:57 pm Tue May 12, 1987
|
||
|
||
Can anyone fill me in on FACS? I got the file by Sharp Razor and Doom Prophet
|
||
has told me about it somewhat, but can anyone explain detailed info on it?
|
||
Thanks (d00d)...
|
||
|
||
-Hatter
|
||
.s
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
48/70: TC15
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 7:21 pm Tue May 12, 1987
|
||
|
||
Actually, it's a TC15 report on a 1AESS... not RC15. Sorry about that. A TC15
|
||
is very long and has a few acronyms in it that I don't recognize. About the
|
||
only one I can remember right now was PUC, Peripheral Unit Controller.
|
||
|
||
For those of you who have problems with the acronyms posted here, you might
|
||
want to check the N)eed acronyms option from the main menu on this board. This
|
||
is an acronym list that I made a while back and gave to TK, and he put a few
|
||
in himself. It's basically correct as far as I know, so please let's not add
|
||
one unless you are sure.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
49/70: Carot, etc.
|
||
Name: Doom Prophet 21
|
||
Date: 4:41 pm Fri May 15, 1987
|
||
|
||
Well, I don't know that much about FACS, although I don't believe that it
|
||
really acts as a replacement for COSMOS, more like an integration/mini datakit
|
||
sort of thing for the different systems related to cosmos.
|
||
|
||
Mad Hatter was asking about CAROT in mail, and I looked through some stuff and
|
||
here is some info about the system. It consists of the two processors for the
|
||
CAROT (database section), the data and the test processor. The TP controls and
|
||
directs the ROTL's and the Circuit Maintenance System (I've seen CMS-1B and
|
||
also CMS-3A, don't know what the current version is). CMS 3A is used with
|
||
TIRKS also. Anyway, the CAROT controller (which is supported by the two
|
||
processors) can do something like 14 tests at the same time (at night when
|
||
their is less traffic on the trunks). The CC also analyzes and sends out the
|
||
test results to the appropriate departments or offices (the CO, an SCC or a
|
||
CTTU station). The ROTL is accessed just by the technician dialing it, which
|
||
is why anyone can dial them. The ROTL is controlled by MF input of the trunk
|
||
group and network numbers. I have seen TNN's as being three digits, but I
|
||
guess it depends upon the office size. The ROTL seizes the trunk to be tested.
|
||
The ATMS responder (Automated Trunk Measurement System) is connected to the
|
||
ends of the tested trunk to receive tthe test measurements. The ROTL somehow
|
||
attaches test equipment to the origiinating end of the trunk. Other test lins
|
||
are used for the terminating end (going into another CO or switch)...I'm sure
|
||
everyone knows there are dialups to CAROT, these are from the Remote User
|
||
Multiplex, the ports for remote terminals to call in through (unless the
|
||
dialup serves for some type of diagnostics testing upon the test equimpment
|
||
itself). 16 people can be on the same RUM....I don't know if that means 16
|
||
people can dial the same dialup and somehow still connect (highly improbable).
|
||
Lex would probably know more about it.
|
||
|
||
Doom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
50/70: Advanced 800
|
||
Name: Taran King 1
|
||
Date: 5:00 pm Fri May 15, 1987
|
||
|
||
Well, I know that many people have been told that to get translations for 800
|
||
numbers, they should call an office that has access to the NCP database. I
|
||
just read a bit about it in CO which I thought was sort of interesting. It's
|
||
part of DSDC (Direct Services Dialing Capabilities). The subscriber dials the
|
||
800 number which is then routed to a 4E. From there, it goes to the ACP
|
||
(Action Control Point or is it ACtion Point?|) which is software that
|
||
determines the special type of call (toll free/976/etc.). The ACP gets it's
|
||
(its) information from the NCP which is the Network Control Point. The NCP
|
||
database receives the call information through CCS and checks on the customer
|
||
service information that the call information goes with, thereby determining
|
||
how to route the call and sends the info back to the ACP. The SMS (Service
|
||
Management System) is used to update information and for definition of that
|
||
information. The NCP database can contain various information such as where
|
||
the translation routes determined by origin of call or time of day too.
|
||
|
||
I have a question about CCS. What is signifigant about the number version? I
|
||
mean, is the information transmitted done differently (different protocol or
|
||
manner of sending) or is it just updates to the way it's wired up? McBlah
|
||
-TK
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
51/70: CCS
|
||
Name: Mad Hatter 51
|
||
Date: 6:02 pm Fri May 15, 1987
|
||
|
||
Randy- I can't seem to find that ancronym or any mention of it. I've followed
|
||
your post all they way up to that. The Advanced 800 Service you read had to
|
||
do with the SPC Network? The paragraph you typed was the same(not word for
|
||
word) as the one here in the Tech on SPC Net. ACP stands for ACtion Point.
|
||
|
||
-Hatter
|
||
|
||
Excuse the time/date of this call..
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
52/70: CCS
|
||
Name: Taran King 1
|
||
Date: 11:05 pm Fri May 15, 1987
|
||
|
||
The CCS that I mentioned (CCS7 presently) is like the modern term for CCIS.
|
||
I'm not sure why they changed it, but that's the accepted acronym now. The
|
||
information that I got from CO magazine was discussing the BOCs' involvement
|
||
in 800 services now. It's highly possible (and probable) that they use the
|
||
same method of signaling for this. Hmm...Oh well, still, I want to know about
|
||
the different versions of CCS. Later
|
||
-TK
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
53/70: CCS
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 12:52 pm Sat May 16, 1987
|
||
|
||
Ok, the international version of CCS is known as as CCITT6, (or 'the CCITT
|
||
signalling system No. 6) which are centered around an International Switching
|
||
Center (ISC). CCITT No. 6 can identify 2048 trunks (CCS can ID 8192 trunks).
|
||
|
||
|
||
I have some pages from an old BSTJ on CCIS in front of me, they have a good
|
||
amount of information about CCITT6 in here. One interesting table inn here is
|
||
Calling parties categries, which are in bits 13-16 of a CCITT No. 6 'message',
|
||
there are provisions for operators in French, English, German, Russian, and
|
||
Spanish, and other user selectable languages, data call, test call, spare,
|
||
etc. I'll have to read more about this, it would be interesting to find out
|
||
how you could make an int'l call over CCITT No. 6 (or maybe 7 now as someone
|
||
said) as a test call.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
54/70: Badgers...
|
||
Name: Taran King 1
|
||
Date: 7:38 pm Sat May 16, 1987
|
||
|
||
A long, long time ago, Jester Sluggo found some stuff about Badgers while
|
||
trashing. Just today, in conversation, I found out a bit about what these
|
||
are. It is a piece of machinery (Badger is the brand name) which is located
|
||
in the SCC (supposedly). It is used for remote trunk testing and it grabs the
|
||
circuit to be tested and runs whatever on it. I have a feeling this is more
|
||
for the independant telcos but I couldn't say for sure. Later
|
||
-TK
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
55/70: Here's......
|
||
Name: The Disk Jockey 13
|
||
Date: 12:40 am Mon May 18, 1987
|
||
|
||
..an employee numthat I guess is sort of a Sprint Newsline.
|
||
|
||
It was LEECHED off of another board, so it remains ted: 8-332-0111
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
56/70: Anyone know?
|
||
Name: Cap'N Crax 10
|
||
Date: 2:22 am Mon May 18, 1987
|
||
|
||
Does anyone know if either/both 900's and 976's terminate in POTS number?
|
||
(Ever?) Something tells me that they probably do..
|
||
|
||
C^2
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
57/70: 976/900s
|
||
Name: Taran King 1
|
||
Date: 6:35 am Mon May 18, 1987
|
||
|
||
I believe that I asked someone that already and neither of them did. They
|
||
both were arranged really strangely and didn't have POTS numbers (or at least
|
||
not standard POTS numbers). If you could log onto the switch for the 900 or
|
||
976 number, you could probably find out, anyway, if it's got a POTS
|
||
translation, but then again, that's a whole different baby. I'll ask again
|
||
and repost when I find out unless Phantom and DP beat me to it (likely). Later
|
||
-TK
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
58/70: 900 and 976
|
||
Name: Kerrang Khan 34
|
||
Date: 4:37 pm Mon May 18, 1987
|
||
|
||
Do not terminate in POTS numbers.
|
||
k
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
59/70: I think..
|
||
Name: Slave Driver 58
|
||
Date: 10:21 am Tue May 19, 1987
|
||
|
||
|
||
that 900s as in the kind you see on TV, like voting things| terminate in a
|
||
4e office. There is some special device that totals the calls if needed| and
|
||
then the people who are using it just call and ask about the numbers...
|
||
|
||
Steve
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
60/70: 900 numbers explained
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 9:35 pm Tue May 19, 1987
|
||
|
||
I was really interested in how 900 numbers worked, it is not common phreak
|
||
knowledge, so I researched via a BSTJ and a little bit of engineering.
|
||
Actually, I wrote a file on the Mass Announcement System (MAS) that is about
|
||
80 sectors, but I never released it because I thought no one gave a fuck. If
|
||
anyone here wants this file, mail me and I'll get it to you somehow, or upload
|
||
it here.
|
||
|
||
900 numbers do terminate in a Number 4 ESS, the 4E that has been allocated
|
||
as your MAS node. As of 1980 (old info, I know) there were 7 No. 4 ESS
|
||
switches that were MAS nodes. That number might be more now, butt the nodes
|
||
were in Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, LA, Newar, and Philly. Each one of
|
||
these covers a particular part of the country. (oops, that 'Newar' up there is
|
||
supposed to be 'Newark'). For instance, if Randy dialed 1-900-555-1212 (the
|
||
Dial it 900 service information line) his call would be sent to the Atlanta
|
||
No. 4 ESS MAS node. If Mad Hatter dialed the same number, his call would be
|
||
sent to the Philly MAS node. (Oh, Alaska and Hawaii are also included in
|
||
this).
|
||
|
||
Back to the original question by Crax, 900 numbers can terminate in a POTS
|
||
number, but I have never seen it done, so I would guess that it's not a common
|
||
occurance. This is called cut through calling, or technically, Media
|
||
Stimulated Calling (MSC). MSC basically sends one call per some unit of time
|
||
to a DDD number.
|
||
|
||
The place that handles the maintenance and administration of all No. 4 ESS
|
||
MAS offices is called ONAC, Operations Network Administration Center. I think
|
||
the ODAC are centralized in Kansas City, Mo, which seems kind of strange
|
||
because there isn't a MAS node there (that I know of).
|
||
|
||
One interesting thing about MAS services is the way Recent Changes are done,
|
||
through an RCRRT2 (Remote Recent Change, don't ask me why the acronym doesn't
|
||
match) channel, which is hardwired to ONAC. If one ever trashed ONAC or a 4E
|
||
MAS node, you could probably find some actual switch output messages. Those
|
||
would be interesting to see. So if anyone ever does any trashing like this
|
||
then let me know.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
61/70: UNIX logs...
|
||
Name: Ax Murderer 7
|
||
Date: 5:33 pm Wed May 20, 1987
|
||
|
||
I haven't been on for awhile, but anyways, whoever was questioning UNIX's,
|
||
which log are you talking about, the one of Berkley (HIST?). There's quite
|
||
a few logs. To get superuser privs on some systems, first go into the /dev/
|
||
section and scan through the files. Almost always there will be a program
|
||
in there which will be UNPROTECTED and allow even the lowest scum to use
|
||
it. The main point is, in case for some emergency reason, he must log on
|
||
from a remote location, and has difficulties, he may process another account.
|
||
|
||
Ax Murderer
|
||
|
||
Also, I got TONS of "C" programs. I also am pretty fluent in this.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
62/70: Unix
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 9:02 pm Fri May 22, 1987
|
||
|
||
Does anyone know a way to implement something similar to some common unix
|
||
commands on a cosnix OS? For instance, the grep command, the find comma the
|
||
file command, and a few others. What I wanted to do was list the ascii files
|
||
in a cosnix directory (assume the /usr/cosmos directory, where COSMOS three
|
||
letter command source is kept, but there couldcii or English Text in it). I
|
||
would do it like this on unix:
|
||
|
||
$ ls -a</tmp/asciick&
|
||
|
||
Then when that process was done:
|
||
|
||
$ grep ascii /tmp/asciic/tmp/final&
|
||
|
||
Then check that file when it was done and it would have a listing of the
|
||
ascii files. Since you cuse the type command, and can't use file, I'd rather
|
||
not look through a long directory listing, and even then it's ot always ascii.
|
||
So does anyone have any shell scripts that might help me out?
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
PS-Sorry for the line noise.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
63/70: RA1 Channel 6
|
||
Name: Icarus 15
|
||
Date: 3:54 am Sun May 24, 1987
|
||
|
||
I dialed 1074654 and I heard "RA1 channel 6" repeated 8 times. Then I found
|
||
out that I could dial 107xxxx and get the recording. Does anyone know what
|
||
that means?
|
||
|
||
This only worked on some phones. Others, after I dialed 10, I would get the
|
||
operator.
|
||
|
||
Icarus
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
64/70: PHREE CALLZ D00DZ
|
||
Name: The Leftist 71
|
||
Date: 10:57 pm Sun May 24, 1987
|
||
|
||
heh, about the easiest way to bill 3rd party or collect is to call spri nt
|
||
operator.. they are dumb, and have no info on you whatsoever.. but you knew
|
||
that didnt you??
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
65/70: centrex
|
||
Name: The Leftist 71
|
||
Date: 4:52 pm Mon May 25, 1987
|
||
|
||
Is there anyone that has any good info, <bell manuals etc..> on Centrex, or
|
||
maybe someone out there knows a few things about it that could post?? Centrex
|
||
in the home is pretty nice thing to have..only costs about 10 bucks to have it
|
||
installed, but its well worth it... more info later..
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
66/70: WELL...
|
||
Name: Sir Francis Drake 56
|
||
Date: 7:05 pm Mon May 25, 1987
|
||
|
||
I HAVE SOME NON TECH CENTREX MANUALS SOMEWHERE...
|
||
|
||
I dont think its all that great right now but when the RBOC's are allowed to
|
||
do all their software stuff it will be pretty cool. There are allread some
|
||
keen centrex packages for voice mail and stuff.
|
||
|
||
Ill go look for them.
|
||
|
||
|
||
sfd
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
67/70: Centrex
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 5:59 pm Sat May 30, 1987
|
||
|
||
Leftist, what do you want to know about centrex? I know a bit about the
|
||
workings of them, the general description, how they are set up in a CO, etc.
|
||
Be more specific in your question...
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
68/70: Blue boxing
|
||
Name: Icarus 15
|
||
Date: 3:28 am Sun May 31, 1987
|
||
|
||
I have found that kp and st are not necessary when dialing off of a trunk.
|
||
After seizing the trunk, ac+ is all that is needed to call out. This seems
|
||
strange. Any comments?
|
||
|
||
Icarus
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
69/70: Reply^
|
||
Name: The Executioner 19
|
||
Date: 4:15 pm Sun May 31, 1987
|
||
|
||
You are not seizing an interoffice trunk.
|
||
|
||
What you are doing is kind of pseudo-boxing, which is what we used to do
|
||
here in New Jersey. What would happen is that we would use MCI, get a
|
||
destination and then blow 2600. Since there were no restrictions on the
|
||
band width, and no filters, we would blow back a dial tone that was possible
|
||
to make international as well as alliance calls with crystal clarity.
|
||
|
||
I don't know the exact name of this but just that we weren't
|
||
seizing a trunk.
|
||
|
||
Ex y
|
||
^ nice space
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
70/70: DP Boxing
|
||
Name: Phantom Phreaker 46
|
||
Date: 8:41 am Mon Jun 01, 1987
|
||
|
||
Icarus, what you are talking about sounds like boxing using a DP (Dial
|
||
Pulse) trunk. DP 'boxing' doesn't use KP and ST, they use a time-out feature.
|
||
DP is made up of short bursts of 2600Hz tone. It isn't all that common as far
|
||
as I know, but some older SxS offices supposedly use it for outpulsing on
|
||
interoffice calls and to CAMA for billing. This means that either the homing
|
||
CAMA office can record dial pulse trunk signalling, or there is some sort of
|
||
sensor to translate it to MF before reception by the CAMA MF digit recievers.
|
||
|
||
Phantom
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Post on Phreak/Hack Sub? No
|
||
|
||
^*^
|
||
=========================================================================
|