mirror of
https://github.com/fdiskyou/Zines.git
synced 2025-03-09 00:00:00 +01:00
813 lines
No EOL
48 KiB
Text
813 lines
No EOL
48 KiB
Text
==Phrack Magazine==
|
||
|
||
Volume Four, Issue Forty-Three, File 10 of 27
|
||
|
||
How to "Hack" BlackJack
|
||
By
|
||
Lex Luthor
|
||
lex@mindvox.phantom.com
|
||
|
||
Part 2 of 2 (50K)
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Card Counting:
|
||
--------------
|
||
|
||
Card Counting? Don't you have to be some sort of mathematical genius or
|
||
have a photographic memory to count cards? No, these are as mythical as that
|
||
415-BUG-1111 "trace detector" number posted on all those old hacker BBSes.
|
||
Well, you may now say, what if the casino is using 4, 6, or even 8 decks?
|
||
Surely you can't keep track of 300+ cards! Don't sweat these details. Probably
|
||
the hardest part about learning to play successful BlackJack has already been
|
||
accomplished in the previous section. That is: memorizing the appropriate
|
||
basic strategy chart. All you really need to count cards is the ability to
|
||
count up to plus or minus twelve or so...by ONES! Of course there are more
|
||
complicated systems but that is all you need to do for the simplest ones.
|
||
|
||
The first card counting systems were developed by our old friend Dr. Thorp.
|
||
He determined through mathematical computation that the card that has the most
|
||
influence on the deck being in a favorable condition (for the player) was the
|
||
five. When the deck is low in fives, the player has a higher advantage than if
|
||
it's sparse in any other card. Logic dictated that for a very simple card
|
||
counting strategy, simply keep track of the abundance (or lack thereof) of
|
||
fives. This is the basis of his "Five Count" system which was later improved
|
||
to include tens and renamed the "Ten Count" system.
|
||
|
||
Today, there are many different card counting systems. Typically, the more
|
||
complex a system is, the better your advantage should you master it. However,
|
||
the difference between card counting System X and System Y is usually so small
|
||
that ease of using the system becomes more important than gaining an
|
||
additional .15 % advantage or whatever it is. I am going to restrict the
|
||
discussion to a single card counting system: the high/low (also called the
|
||
plus/minus) point count. This strategy is very easy to master. Two other
|
||
methods that I recommend if you're serious are the Advanced Plus/Minus and the
|
||
"Hi-Opt I" systems. The former being similar to the high/low but assigns
|
||
fractional values to certain cards as opposed to integer values which are
|
||
easier to add in your head. The latter method is considered one of the most
|
||
powerful yet reasonable (with respect to complexity) counting systems of all
|
||
time and is detailed extensively on pages 213 to 277 of [7].
|
||
|
||
The quick and dirty reason why card counting works is this: The player
|
||
gains an advantage when a deck has a SHORTAGE of cards valued 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
|
||
7, 8. When a deck has a SHORTAGE of cards valued 9, 10, Ace; the player has a
|
||
DISadvantage. If you can tell when the deck is rich in 9's, 10's, and Aces
|
||
(ie, when you hold the advantage) you can do one of the following things:
|
||
|
||
1) Bet more money when the deck is favorable to you.
|
||
2) Alter your Basic Strategy play to account for the favorability
|
||
thereby increasing the odds of winning a particular hand.
|
||
3) Combine 1 & 2 by betting more AND altering Basic Strategy.
|
||
|
||
Now lets discuss the +/- Point Count. As you can see from the small chart
|
||
below, a plus value is given to low cards, and a minus value is given to high
|
||
cards. Notice that 7, 8, and 9 have a value of zero. This is because their
|
||
overall effect is negligible as compared to the others. Some systems use a
|
||
value of -2 for the Ace instead of -1 and give a value of +1 to the seven
|
||
instead of zero. If you are using a BlackJack computer game for practice,
|
||
check to see what card counting system(s) it uses. They should offer one of
|
||
the above two variations. Learn that one, since it will allow you to prepare
|
||
well for actual casino play. See the "Some Comments Regarding Computer
|
||
BlackJack Programs for the PC" section for more on this. Now the chart:
|
||
|
||
+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| PLUS (+1) || MINUS (-1) |
|
||
+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 || 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | A |
|
||
+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 || 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
||
+-----------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
As you may notice, this is a balanced system. There are 20 cards in a deck
|
||
that are valued +1: two through six. There are 16 ten value cards and 4 Aces
|
||
in a deck (20 total) that are valued -1. The remaining 12 cards (7, 8, 9) have
|
||
a value of zero. At the end of a deck the count should be zero. A good drill
|
||
to practice is to get a deck of cards, turn them over one by one, and keep
|
||
track of the count. If you enter a game mid-way between the deck or shoe, flat
|
||
bet until the cards are shuffled. Once the cards are shuffled commence
|
||
counting from zero.
|
||
|
||
Lets do a quick example using ten cards. The following ten cards are shown
|
||
in the course of a hand: A, 4, 7, 10, 10, 9, 10, 2, 10, 5. Just so no one gets
|
||
lost, we will do one card at a time and then keep the running total: the first
|
||
value is -1 (the Ace) & the second is +1 (the 4) = 0 (the current total hand
|
||
count). The next card is the 7 which is zero so disregard it. The next card is
|
||
a ten so the total count is now -1. The next card is another ten, giving a
|
||
total count of -2. The next card is a nine which has a value of zero so ignore
|
||
it, total count is still at -2. Next is a ten, total count is at -3. Next is
|
||
a two which adds +1 to the minus three yielding a total of -2. A quick look at
|
||
the next two cards shows that the two will cancel each other out (-1+1=0). So
|
||
at the end of a hand of ten cards dealt to 2 players and the dealer, the point
|
||
count is minus two. This provides you with the knowledge that your are at a
|
||
slight disadvantage. Your next bet should either be the same or a unit or two
|
||
lower.
|
||
|
||
From this example you see that it would be easier to count cards if you
|
||
play in a "cards-up" game. That way you can see all the cards as they are
|
||
dealt and count them as they go by. When the dealer deals fast, just count
|
||
every two cards. You still count each card but you only add to your total
|
||
count after every two cards since many times the two values will cancel each
|
||
other out to give a net value of zero, which doesn't need to be added to your
|
||
total. If you play in a cards-down game, you may want to consider playing at
|
||
third base. The reason being is that in a cards-down game you only see the
|
||
other players' cards:
|
||
|
||
a) if you peek at their hand (not polite but it's not cheating like in poker)
|
||
b) if a player busts
|
||
c) when the dealer settles each players' hand.
|
||
|
||
When there are other people at a table, all this happens rather quickly and
|
||
you may miss a few cards here and there which essentially invalidates your
|
||
count. You can't control how fast the dealer deals, but you can slow things
|
||
down when the dealer prompts you for a play decision.
|
||
|
||
I am not going to discuss changing basic strategy here. The chart you
|
||
memorize in Basic Strategy section of this file will be fine for now. If you
|
||
are already adept at the plus/minus count then find a book that has a complete
|
||
system including the appropriate changes to Basic Strategy that reflect the
|
||
current running and/or true count.
|
||
|
||
For one deck, alter your wager according to the following table:
|
||
|
||
BET UNITS +/- Running Count
|
||
-----------------------------
|
||
1 +1 or less
|
||
2 +2 or +3
|
||
3 +4 or +5
|
||
4 +6 or +7
|
||
5 +8 or more
|
||
|
||
Example: After the first hand of a one deck game, the point count is plus
|
||
four and you just bet a $5.00 chip. Before the next hand is dealt, wager
|
||
$15.00 (three units of $5.00) as the above table mandates.
|
||
|
||
What if there are four, six, or more decks instead of just one? I recommend
|
||
that you perform a "true-count" rather than trying to remember different
|
||
betting strategies for different number of deck games. By doing a true count,
|
||
the above table can still be used.
|
||
|
||
The True Count is found by the ensuing equation. I provide an example along
|
||
with it for the case of having a running count of +9 with one and a half decks
|
||
left unplayed. It doesn't matter how many decks are used, you just have to have
|
||
a good eye at guesstimating the number of decks that are left in the shoe. I
|
||
just measured the thickness of a deck of cards to be 5/8 (10/16) of an inch.
|
||
Hence the thickness of a half deck is 5/16 of an inch. One and a half decks
|
||
would be 10/16 + 10/16 + 5/16 = 25/16 or a little over an inch and a half. You
|
||
probably see a relationship here. The number of decks is approximately equal
|
||
to the height of the cards in inches. Easy.
|
||
|
||
Running Count +9
|
||
True Count = ---------------------- = ----- = +6
|
||
# of Decks Remaining 1.5
|
||
|
||
Looking at the table of betting units above, the proper wager would be four
|
||
units.
|
||
|
||
If you have trouble keeping the count straight in your head, you can use
|
||
your chips as a memory storage device. After every hand tally up the net count
|
||
and update the running or true count by rearranging your chips. This is
|
||
somewhat conspicuous however, and if done blatantly, may get you labeled a
|
||
counter.
|
||
|
||
If for some reason you despise the notion of counting cards, you may want
|
||
to pick up Reference [11], "Winning Without Counting". The author writes about
|
||
using kinesics (body language) to help determine what the dealers' hole card
|
||
is after checking for a Natural. He claims that certain dealers have certain
|
||
habits as far as body language is concerned, especially when they check to see
|
||
if they have a BlackJack. The dealer will check the hole card if he/she has a
|
||
ten value card or an Ace as the up-card. When the hand is over you will see
|
||
what the hole card really was. You may be able to discern a certain
|
||
characteristic about the dealer, such as a raising of the eyebrows whenever
|
||
the hole card is a 2-9 or perhaps a slight frown, etc. There is some
|
||
usefulness to this method but I wouldn't rely on it very much at all. I have
|
||
only used it for one particular situation. That being when the dealer has a
|
||
ten up card and checks to see if the hole card is an Ace. Note that many
|
||
dealers check the hole card very quickly and turn up just the corner of the
|
||
card so as to prevent any of the players from seeing the card. If the hole
|
||
card is an Ace, the dealer will turn over the card and declare a BlackJack.
|
||
However, if the hole card is a 4, many times the dealer will double check it.
|
||
The reason for this double take is simply that a 4 looks like an Ace from the
|
||
corner, get a deck of cards and see for yourself. A 4 really looks like an Ace
|
||
and vice-versa when the corner is checked in a QUICK motion. So, if you see
|
||
the dealer double check the hole card and NOT declare a BlackJack, you can be
|
||
fairly sure the hold card is a four, giving the dealer a total of 14. You can
|
||
now adjust your basic strategy play accordingly. This situation has only come
|
||
up a few times in my case, but once was when I had a $50.00 bet riding on the
|
||
hand and I won the hand by using that additional information. Dr. Julian Braun
|
||
has previously calculated that the player has about a 10% advantage over the
|
||
house should he/she know what the dealer's hole card is. This is quite
|
||
substantial. Of course you have to memorize a specific Basic Strategy chart
|
||
for the case of knowing what the dealers' total is in order to obtain the
|
||
maximum benefit. I haven't bothered memorizing this chart simply because it is
|
||
a rare occurrence to know what the dealers' hole card is. If you sit down at a
|
||
table with an inexperienced dealer, you might catch a couple more than usual,
|
||
but I don't think it is enough to warrant the extra work unless you want to
|
||
turn pro.
|
||
|
||
Another thing Winning Without Counting mentions is to pay attention to the
|
||
arches and warps in the cards. Perhaps a lot of the ten value cards have a
|
||
particular warp in them due to all those times the dealer checked for a
|
||
BlackJack. The author claims that he has used this to his advantage. Maybe so,
|
||
but I don't put much stock in this technique. I have enough things to worry
|
||
about while playing.
|
||
|
||
One last thing. There is no law or rule that says a dealer cannot count
|
||
cards. A dealer may count cards because he or she is bored but more likely is
|
||
that the casino may encourage counting. The reason being that if the deck is
|
||
favorable to the player, the house can know this and "shuffle up". This is
|
||
also called preferential shuffling (a game control measure) and it vaporizes
|
||
your advantage.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Shuffle Tracking:
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
Shuffle What? Shuffle Tracking. This is a fairly new (15 years +/-)
|
||
technique that has not been publicized very much. One problem with many of the
|
||
BlackJack books out there is that they are not hip to the current game. The
|
||
obvious reason for this is that many are old or simply re-formulate strategies
|
||
that were invented decades ago. It's just like reading "How to Hack the Primos
|
||
Version 18 Operating System" today. The file may be interesting, many of the
|
||
commands may be the same, but it doesn't detail how to take advantage of, and
|
||
subvert the CURRENT version of the OS.
|
||
|
||
The best definition I have seen is this one quoted from Reference [5]:
|
||
"'Shuffle-tracking' is the science of following specific cards through the
|
||
shuffling process for the purpose of either keeping them in play or cutting
|
||
them out of play." The concept of Shuffle tracking appears to have resulted
|
||
from bored mathematician's research and computer simulation of shuffling
|
||
cards, a familiar theme to BlackJack you say. The main thing that I hope every
|
||
reader gets from this section is that just because someone shuffles a deck (or
|
||
decks) of cards does not in any way mean that the cards are "randomized". The
|
||
methods mentioned in the two previous sections (Basic Strategy and Card
|
||
Counting) ASSUME A RANDOM DISTRIBUTION OF CARDS! That is an important point.
|
||
According to some authors, a single deck of cards must be shuffled twenty to
|
||
thirty times to ensure a truly random dispersion. If a Casino is using a 6
|
||
deck shoe, that's 120 to 180 shuffles! Obviously they aren't going to shuffle
|
||
anywhere near that many times. But don't despair, there are some types of
|
||
shuffles which are good, and some that are bad. In fact, if the cards were
|
||
always randomly disbursed, then you would not be reading this section due to
|
||
it's lack of relevance. As in the Card Counting section, I am going to
|
||
restrict the discussion to the basics of shuffle tracking as the combination
|
||
of references listed at the end of this section provide a complete discourse of
|
||
the topic.
|
||
|
||
A beneficial (to the player) shuffle for a one deck game is executed by
|
||
dividing the deck equally into 26 cards and shuffling them together a minimum
|
||
of three times. This allows the cards to be sufficiently intermixed to yield a
|
||
fairly random distribution. An adverse shuffle prevents the cards from mixing
|
||
completely.
|
||
|
||
The simplest example is the Unbalanced Shuffle. As its name implies, the
|
||
dealer breaks the deck into two unequal stacks. As an example, lets say you
|
||
are playing two hands head on with the dealer and the last 10 cards in the
|
||
deck are dealt. The result of the hand was that both your hands lost to the
|
||
dealer primarily due to the high percentage of low value cards in the clump.
|
||
Note that if you were counting, you would have bet a single unit since the
|
||
deck was unfavorable. The dealer is now ready to shuffle the deck, and
|
||
separates the deck into 31 cards in one stack and 21 in the other stack. The
|
||
dealer shuffles the two stacks. If the shuffle is done from the bottom of each
|
||
stack on up, the top ten cards of the larger stack will remain intact without
|
||
mixing with any of the other cards. Those ten cards can remain in the order
|
||
they were just dealt throughout the shuffle if the process of bottom to top
|
||
shuffling is not altered. You are now asked to cut the deck. If you don't cut
|
||
the deck, the 10 cards that were dealt last hand will be dealt as your first
|
||
two hands. The result will be the same as your last and you will lose the two
|
||
hands. However, if you cut the deck exactly at the end of those ten cards, you
|
||
have just altered the future to your benefit. Those cards will now be placed at
|
||
the bottom of the deck. Should the dealer shuffle up early, you will avoid them
|
||
altogether. In addition, if you were keeping count, you would know that the
|
||
deck was favorable during the first 3-4 hands since there would be an abundance
|
||
of tens in the portion of the deck that will be played. You would accordingly
|
||
increase you bet size to maximize your winnings.
|
||
|
||
Some dealers will unknowingly split the deck into unequal stacks. However,
|
||
more often than not, they are REQUIRED to split the deck into unequal stacks.
|
||
If they are required to do this, they are performing the House Shuffle. The
|
||
casino has trained the dealer to shuffle a particular way...on purpose! Why?
|
||
Because in the long run, the house will benefit from this because most players
|
||
will not cut any bad clumps out of play. If you have played BlackJack in a
|
||
casino, how much did you pay attention to the way they shuffled? Like most
|
||
people you were probably oblivious to it, perhaps you figured that during the
|
||
shuffle would be a good time to ask that hot waitress for another drink.
|
||
Regardless, you now see that it may be a good idea to pay attention during the
|
||
shuffle instead of that set of "big breastseses" as David Allen Grier says on
|
||
the "In Living Color" TV show ;)-8-<
|
||
|
||
There are a number of shuffle methods, some of which have been labeled as:
|
||
the "Zone Shuffle", the "Strip Shuffle", and the "Stutter Shuffle". The Zone
|
||
Shuffle is particular to shoe games (multiple deck games) and is probably one
|
||
of the most common shuffle methods which is why I mention it here. It is
|
||
accomplished by splitting the shoe into 4 to 8 piles depending on the number
|
||
of decks in the shoe. Prescribed picks from each pile are made in a very exact
|
||
way with intermittent shuffles of each pair of half deck sized stacks. The net
|
||
effect is a simple regrouping of the cards pretty much in the same region of
|
||
the shoe as they were before, thereby preventing clumps of cards from being
|
||
randomly mixed. If the dealer won 40 hands and you won 20, this trend is
|
||
likely to continue until you are broke or until the unfavorable bias is
|
||
removed through many shuffles.
|
||
|
||
What if the players are winning the 40 hands and the dealer only 20? If the
|
||
dealer has been mentally keeping track of how many hands each side has won in
|
||
the shoe, the dealer will probably do one of two things. One is to keep the
|
||
shuffle the same, but 'strip' the deck. When a dealer strips a deck, he/she
|
||
strips off one card at a time from the shoe letting them fall on top of one
|
||
another onto the table. This action causes the order of the cards to be
|
||
reversed. The main consequence is to dissipate any clumping advantages (a bunch
|
||
of tens in a clump) that the players may have. The second thing the dealer may
|
||
do is simply change the way they shuffle to help randomize the cards.
|
||
|
||
I personally believe that casinos use certain shuffles on purpose for the
|
||
sole reason that they gain some sort of advantage. A BlackJack dealer friend
|
||
of mine disputes the whole theory of card clumping and shuffle tracking
|
||
though. The mathematics and simulation prove the non-random nature of certain
|
||
shuffles under controlled conditions. Perhaps in an actual casino environment
|
||
the effect isn't as high. Regardless, next time you are playing in a casino
|
||
and its time to shuffle a shoe, ask the dealer to CHANGE they WAY he/she
|
||
shuffles. The answer will nearly always be NO. Try to appeal to the pit boss
|
||
and he/she will probably mumble something about casino policy. Why are they
|
||
afraid to change the shuffle?
|
||
|
||
Relevant Reading: [4], [5] Chapters 5 and 6 pages 71 to 98, [14] pages 463
|
||
to 466, and [15] which is very detailed and accessible via Internet FTP.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Casino Security and Surveillance:
|
||
--------------------------------
|
||
|
||
I figured this section might get some people's attention. It is important
|
||
to know what the casino is capable of as far as detecting cheating (by
|
||
employees and customers) and spotting card counters.
|
||
|
||
EYE IN THE SKY: A two way mirror in the ceiling of the casino. It's not hard
|
||
to spot in older casinos as it usually is very long. Before 1973 or so,
|
||
employees traversed catwalks in the ceiling and it was easy for dealers and
|
||
players to hear when they were being watched. Sometimes dust from the ceiling
|
||
would settle down onto a table when someone was above it. Newer casinos use
|
||
those big dark plexiglass bubbles with video camera's which should be watched
|
||
constantly. These cameras have awesome Z00M capabilities and according to
|
||
Reference [9], the cameras can read the word "liberty" on a penny placed on a
|
||
BlackJack table. I am sure the resolution is better than that for the latest
|
||
equipment. The video images are also taped for use as evidence should anything
|
||
that is suspect be detected. Just like computer security audit logs, if no one
|
||
pays attention to them, they don't do much good. If you want a job monitoring
|
||
gamblers and casino employees, you need to train for about 500 hours (about
|
||
twenty 40 hour weeks) to learn all the tricks people try to pull on you.
|
||
Pretty intensive program wouldn't you say?
|
||
|
||
CASINO EMPLOYEES: Then there are the casino employees. The dealers watch the
|
||
players, the floor men watch the dealers and the players, the pitbosses watch
|
||
the dealers, the floormen, and the players, etc. There may be plain clothes
|
||
detectives roaming about. In a casino, everyone is suspect.
|
||
|
||
BLACK BOOK: A company that you will see mentioned in a lot of casino books is
|
||
Griffin Investigations. They periodically update a book that casino's
|
||
subscribe to that have pictures and related info on barred card counters and
|
||
known casino cheats.....I suppose the "black book" as it is called, is
|
||
analogous to the "Bell security hit-lists", that had (have?) files on known
|
||
phreaks and hackers.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Social Engineering the Casino:
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
If you are good at getting an ESS operator to enter NET-LINE on DN COE-XXXX,
|
||
and at getting those "Engineering Resistant Hard Asses up at SNET (Southern
|
||
New England Telephone)" [as The Marauder affectionately calls them] to give
|
||
you the new CRSAB number; then this section will be a piece of cake for you
|
||
to master.
|
||
|
||
References [3], [7], and [8] have many stories regarding playing in
|
||
casinos, getting barred, and various exploits. I am not going to repeat any of
|
||
them here. In each of those books, the authors talk about their first
|
||
experiences getting barred. In each case they were fairly bewildered as to why
|
||
they were kicked out, at least until some casino employee or owner told them
|
||
things like "you're just too good" and the ever diplomatic: "we know your
|
||
kind, get the hell out!".
|
||
|
||
As you probably have gathered thus far, card counters are as undesirable in
|
||
a casino as a phone phreak is in a central office. There are a number of
|
||
behavioral characteristics which have been attributed to the 'typical' card
|
||
counter. Probably the most obvious act of a counter is a large increase in bet
|
||
size. If you recall in the Card Counting section, when the deck is favorable,
|
||
you bet more. When the deck is unfavorable, you bet less. Dr. Thorp's original
|
||
system required a variation in bet size from one to ten units. When the deck
|
||
is favorable the system may dictate that you go from a ten dollar bet to a
|
||
hundred dollar bet. Kind of gets the attention of the dealer and the pit boss.
|
||
However, this type of wild wagering is typical of big money hunch bettors.
|
||
Hunch betters will just plop down a bunch of chips at random due to 'hunches'.
|
||
Therefore, a large increase in bet size won't necessarily cause you to be
|
||
pegged as a counter.
|
||
|
||
Intense concentration, never taking your eyes off the cards, lack of
|
||
emotion...ie, playing like a computer, is pretty much a give away that you are
|
||
counting. Other things such as 'acting suspicious', meticulously stacking your
|
||
chips, betting in discernable patterns, and a devout abstention from alcohol
|
||
may also attract unwanted attention.
|
||
|
||
Another criteria used for spotting counters is if there are two or more
|
||
people playing in concert with one another. Ken Uston is famous for his
|
||
BlackJack teams. They have literally won millions of dollars collectively.
|
||
When the "Team-LOD" gets together to play, we have to pretend we don't know
|
||
each other so as not to attract undue attention ;-)
|
||
|
||
What I mean by Social Engineering the casino is to list ways that trick the
|
||
casino into thinking you are just a dumb tourist who is throwing money away.
|
||
Look around, smile, act unconcerned about your bet, don't be afraid to talk to
|
||
the dealer, floorperson, or pit boss. Don't play 8 hours straight. Perhaps
|
||
order a drink. Things of this nature will help deflect suspicion.
|
||
|
||
I only recall attracting attention once. The casino wasn't very busy, there
|
||
were 3 people at the table including myself. I only had about an hour to play
|
||
so I bet aggressively. I started with $5 and $10 but made some $50.00 bets
|
||
whenever I got a feeling that I was going to win the next hand (quite the
|
||
scientific strategy I know). A woman next to me who seemed to be a fairly
|
||
seasoned player made a comment that I was a little too aggressive. The pit boss
|
||
hovered about the table. My hour was nearly up, I bet $10.00 for the dealer and
|
||
$50.00 for myself. I lost the hand leaving me only $100.00 ahead, and left. The
|
||
only thing I could think of besides the betting spread which really wasn't a
|
||
big deal was that the casino was FREEZING inside. I was shivering like hell,
|
||
it probably looked like I was shaking out of fear of being spotted as a
|
||
counter or worse...a cheater.
|
||
|
||
So what if a casino thinks you are counter? To be honest, there have
|
||
probably been less than 1000 people who have been permanently barred from play
|
||
(ie, they have their mugs in the black book). A far greater number have been
|
||
asked to leave but were not prevented from returning in the future.
|
||
|
||
Tipping the dealer may not necessarily get the casino off your back but
|
||
certainly doesn't hurt. When you toke the dealer, place the chip in the corner
|
||
of your betting box a few inches from your bet. You may want to say "we are in
|
||
this one together" or some such to make sure they are aware of the tip. This
|
||
approach is better than just giving them the chip because their 'fate' is tied
|
||
in with yours. If your hand wins, 99 out of 100 times they will take the tip
|
||
and the tip's winnings off the table.
|
||
|
||
The 1 out of 100 that the dealer let the tip+win ride happened to me over
|
||
and over again for the better part of a day. It was a week before I had to go
|
||
back to college and I was broke, with no money to pay the deposits for rent
|
||
and utilities. Basically, if I didn't come up with some money in 7 days, I was
|
||
not going back to school. This was 4 years ago BTW. I took out $150 on my
|
||
credit card (stupid but hey, I was desperate) and started playing and winning
|
||
immediately. I pressed my bets time and time again and in an hour or two had
|
||
$500 in front of me (+$350). I started losing a bit so I took a break for a
|
||
short while. I went back to a different table with a different dealer. As soon
|
||
as I sat down I started winning. I started to tip red chips ($5.00) for the
|
||
dealer. The first couple of times he took the $10.00 right away. I kept
|
||
winning steadily and continued to toke him. Then he started to let the $10.00
|
||
ride! I was amazed because I had never seen that before. That is when I knew I
|
||
was HOT. If the dealer is betting on you to win, that says something. When I
|
||
stopped playing I cashed in eight black chips. I left with eight one hundred
|
||
dollar bills, a net profit of $650.00, just enough to cover everything. Whew!
|
||
I probably tipped close to $100.00 that day, and the dealer must have made
|
||
double to triple that due to him betting with me. There were a number of times
|
||
when the pit boss wasn't close that the dealer would IGNORE my hit or stand
|
||
signal. The first time he did this I repeated myself and he did what I asked
|
||
but gave me a 'look'. Needless to say, I lost the hand. After that, if he
|
||
'thought' I said stand, I didn't argue. This occurred when he had a ten as the
|
||
up-card so he knew his total from peeking at the hole card. I am not sure if
|
||
this is considered cheating because I did not ask him to do this, nor did we
|
||
conspire. It just happened a few times, usually when I had $25-$50 bets on the
|
||
line which is when I made sure to throw in a red chip for him.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Casino Cheating and Player Cheating:
|
||
------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Cheating by the house is rare in the major casinos ie, those located in
|
||
Nevada and Atlantic City. The Nevada Gaming Commission may revoke a casino's
|
||
gambling license if a casino is caught cheating players. Granted, there may be
|
||
a few employees (dealers, boxmen, whomever) that may cheat players, but it is
|
||
extremely doubtful any casino in Nevada or Atlantic City does so on a
|
||
casino-wide scale. You definitely should be wary of any casino that is not
|
||
regulated such as those found on many cruise ships. Because a casino does not
|
||
have to answer to any regulatory agency does not mean it is cheating players.
|
||
The fact is that casino's make plenty of money legitimately with the built-in
|
||
house advantages and don't really need to cheat players to survive. I provide
|
||
some cheating methods here merely to make you aware of the scams. These
|
||
techniques are still carried out in crooked underground casinos and private
|
||
games.
|
||
|
||
The single deck hand-held BlackJack game is quite a bit more susceptible to
|
||
cheating by both the dealer and the player than games dealt from a shoe. The
|
||
preferred method of dealer cheating is called the "second deal". As you may
|
||
infer, this technique requires the card mechanic to pretend to deal the top
|
||
card but instead deals the card that is immediately under the top card.
|
||
Imagine if you could draw a low card when you need a low card, and a high card
|
||
when you need a high card. You could win large sums of money in a very short
|
||
period. Well, a dealer who has the ability to execute the demanding sleight of
|
||
hand movements for second dealing can drain even the best BlackJack player's
|
||
bankroll in short order.
|
||
|
||
If someone is going to deal seconds, they must know what the second card is
|
||
if he or she is to benefit. One way to determine the second card is by
|
||
peeking. A mechanic will distract you by pointing or gesticulating with the
|
||
hand that is holding the deck. "Look! There's Gail Thackeray!". While you are
|
||
busy looking, the dealer is covertly peeking at the second card. A more risky
|
||
method is pegging. A device called a pegger is used to put small indentations
|
||
in the cards that the dealer can feel. Pegging all the ten value cards has
|
||
obvious benefits.
|
||
|
||
Another method is the "high-low pickup". I like this one because it's easy
|
||
for a novice to do especially in a place where there are a lot of distractions
|
||
for the players. After every hand, the dealer picks up the cards in a high-low
|
||
alternating order. The mechanic then proceeds with the "false shuffle" in
|
||
which the deck is thought to have been shuffled but in reality the cards
|
||
remain in the same order as before the shuffle. As you well know by now, a
|
||
high-low-high-low arrangement of the cards would be death to the BlackJack
|
||
player. Get dealt a ten and then a 5, you have to hit, so get another ten.
|
||
Busted. Since the dealer doesn't lose until he/she busts, all the players who
|
||
bust before lose. Bottom dealing and switching hole cards are other techniques
|
||
that may be used to cheat players.
|
||
|
||
For shoe games, there is a device called a "holdout shoe" that essentially
|
||
second deals for the dealer. Discreet mirrors and prisms may be contained in
|
||
the holdout shoe which only allow the dealer to see what card is next.
|
||
Shorting a regular shoe of ten cards will obviously have a detrimental effect
|
||
on the BlackJack player.
|
||
|
||
Player cheating isn't recommended. However, I'll quickly list some of the
|
||
methods for awareness purposes. The old stand-by of going up to a table,
|
||
grabbing some chips, and running like hell is still done but certainly lacks
|
||
originality. Marking cards while you play is another popular method. "The
|
||
Daub" technique is done by clandestinely applying a substance that leaves an
|
||
almost invisible smudge on the card. High value cards like tens are usually
|
||
the targets. One scam mentioned in one of the references was the use of a
|
||
special paint that was only visible to specially made contact lenses. The
|
||
"hold out" method requires the palming of a card and substituting a better
|
||
one. This is usually done when there is big money bet on the hand. One of the
|
||
risks to these methods is when the deck is changed since the pit boss always
|
||
scrutinizes the decks after they are taken out of play.
|
||
|
||
Other methods entail playing two hands and switching cards from one hand to
|
||
the other, counterfeiting cards and/or casino chips, adding chips after a
|
||
winning hand (I have seen this done twice, couldn't believe my eyes but
|
||
certainly wasn't going to RAT the thieves out). Some dealers may be careless
|
||
when looking at their hole card for a BlackJack. A person behind the dealer on
|
||
the other side of the pit may be able to discern the card. The value is then
|
||
signalled to a player at the table. Astute pit bosses may notice someone who
|
||
is not playing that scratches their head too much though. Wireless signalling
|
||
devices have been used for various purposes but some casinos have new
|
||
electronic detection systems that monitor certain frequencies for activity.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Some Comments Regarding Computer BlackJack Software for PC's:
|
||
---------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
I strongly recommend that you practice using a BlackJack program of some
|
||
kind before going out to play with real cash. The first program I used for
|
||
'training' some years ago was "Ken Uston's BlackJack" on my old Apple ][+.
|
||
Later I acquired "Beat The House" for the same machine. I recently bought a
|
||
program for my IBM and have been using it to refresh my memory regarding basic
|
||
strategy, card counting, and money management techniques. I assume you will
|
||
recognize the guy's name in the title now that you have read most of this
|
||
article. I bought: "Dr. Thorp's Mini BlackJack" by Villa Crespo Software at a
|
||
Wal-Mart of all places for a measly $7.88. This is an abridged version
|
||
however. Villa Crespo charges $12.95 for it if you order via mail. They also
|
||
offer an unabridged version for $29.95 via mail. Villa Crespo (don't ask me
|
||
where they got that name) offers other programs for Craps, Video Poker, and
|
||
7-Card Stud in case you are interested in those games of chance. By the way,
|
||
on the order form I also noticed "FAILSAFE Computer Guardian (Complete
|
||
protection and security for your system)" for $59.95. For some reason any time
|
||
a piece of paper has the word 'security' on it, my eyes zero in on it....
|
||
|
||
Some features that I liked about this scaled down version of their
|
||
BlackJack program were the TUTOR, which advises you on whether to hit, stand,
|
||
take insurance (no way), etc. as per Basic Strategy. The Tutor for the
|
||
abridged version does NOT take into consideration the card count when making
|
||
recommendations though. If you are counting the cards, the program keeps count
|
||
also, so if you lose count you can check it by pressing a function key. The
|
||
STATS option is neat since it keeps track of things such as how many hands
|
||
were dealt, how many you won/lost, etc. and can be printed out so you can
|
||
track your progress. The program allows you to save your current session in
|
||
case you get the urge to dial up the Internet to check your email, something
|
||
that should be done every hour on the hour....
|
||
|
||
One thing I did not like about the program was that it allowed you to bet
|
||
over your bankroll. I accidentally pushed [F2] (standardized at $500.00 a
|
||
bet instead of [F1] (standardized at $5.00 a bet) ---- a slight difference in
|
||
wager I'd say. Having only $272.00 in my bankroll didn't stop the program from
|
||
executing the command and in my opinion it should have prevented the overdraft.
|
||
|
||
The first time I played Dr. Thorp's Mini BlackJack, it took me about 95
|
||
hands to double my money. I started with $200.00, bet from $5.00 to $25.00,
|
||
never dropped below $180.00 which surprised me, and received 3 BlackJacks. I
|
||
won 63 hands, and lost 32. I played head on against the dealer, although the
|
||
program allows for up to 6 players. I consider that lucky since I had my fair
|
||
share of going broke in later sessions.
|
||
|
||
My advice when using a BlackJack computer program is: do not start with a
|
||
bizzillion dollars or anything like that. Start with the amount that you truly
|
||
plan to use when you sit down at an actual table. If you play in a crowded
|
||
casino, all the low minimum bet tables (ie: $1.00 to $5.00) will most likely be
|
||
filled to capacity and only $10.00 or $15.00 tables will have openings. Keep
|
||
this in mind because when you make bets with the computer program, you should
|
||
wager no less than whatever the minimum will be at the table you sit down at.
|
||
If your bankroll is only $200.00 playing at anything more than a $5.00 minimum
|
||
table is pushing it.
|
||
|
||
Another thing to note is that playing at home is kind of like watching
|
||
Jeopardy on TV while you are sitting on the couch. People who have been on the
|
||
show always say it was much harder than when they blurted out answers during
|
||
dinner with their mouths full (the Heimlich maneuver--a real lifesaver!). The
|
||
same thing goes for BlackJack. When you are sitting at an actual table, your
|
||
adrenaline is flowing, your heart starts to pump faster, you make irrational
|
||
plays especially when you start losing, and odds are you will forget things
|
||
that were memorized perfectly. There is no substitute for the real thing and
|
||
real experience.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Quick Comments on Other Casino Games:
|
||
-------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
A few people suggested I briefly mention some of the other casino games so
|
||
I added this section. I don't go into much detail at all as this file is too
|
||
unwieldy already. Besides, if you want to know more, I am sure you'll pick up
|
||
the appropriate reference. Hundreds of books have been published on gambling
|
||
and they are available by contacting [2]. My aim here was to mention details
|
||
that most people may not be aware of.
|
||
|
||
BACCARAT: This is the game you see in movies a lot. See [12]'s FAQ for a good
|
||
explanation of this game.
|
||
|
||
CRAPS: Craps is probably the most complicated casino game as far as the
|
||
different ways to bet things are concerned but its really not that hard to
|
||
learn. I just want to throw one table at you adapted from Reference [13]. The
|
||
table won't make much sense unless you are already familiar with craps. In
|
||
case you have forgotten or didn't know, craps is 'that dice game'. The purpose
|
||
of presenting it is to save you $$$$$ <-- Still love that dollar sign key! hehe
|
||
|
||
Lamest Bets at the Craps Table
|
||
|
||
BET PAYS SHOULD PAY YOUR ADVANTAGE
|
||
-------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Any-7 4 to 1 5 to 1 -16.7 %
|
||
2 (or 12) 30 to 1 35 to 1 -13.9 %
|
||
Hard 10 (or 4) 7 to 1 8 to 1 -11.1 %
|
||
3 (or 11) 15 to 1 17 to 1 -11.1 %
|
||
Any Craps 37 to 1 8 to 1 -11.1 %
|
||
Hard 6 (or 8) 9 to 1 10 to 1 -9.1 %
|
||
|
||
SLOTS: Playing slots is a gamble. Obviously you say. No, I mean its a gamble
|
||
to play them. House advantages are almost never displayed on a particular slot
|
||
machine. Different machines and different locations may have different casino
|
||
win percentages. When you go up to a slot machine, you have no idea if its'
|
||
advantage over you is 5% or 25%. Unless you have been watching it, you don't
|
||
know if it just paid off a big jackpot either. I don't play slots as a matter
|
||
of principle. If you do play I think there are still some $.05 slots in Vegas.
|
||
Play the nickel slots and keep your shirt, especially if its an LOD T-shirt.
|
||
|
||
VIDEO POKER: Reference [13] gives the following advice regarding video poker:
|
||
"...don't expect to win. Manage your money so that you limit your losses." I
|
||
think its a bit negative but I can't argue with the logic. Also, as with
|
||
slots, you may want to play at a machine that is networked with others which
|
||
has a progressive payoff. This way at least you have a chance of making the
|
||
big bucks in addition to those periodic small payoffs.
|
||
|
||
VIDEO BLACKJACK: If you like to avoid people and like BlackJack, you may be
|
||
thinking that this is a great way for you to "hack two systems with one
|
||
password" and make a little money on the side. Before you start putting
|
||
quarter or dollar tokens into video BlackJack machines there are a couple of
|
||
things to know. First, you can't use card counting techniques because
|
||
every hand is essentially dealt from a new deck. When the computer deals a
|
||
hand it is just providing 'random' cards. Perhaps if you saw the source code,
|
||
you may be able to determine some sort of bias but I suspect it would be
|
||
minuscule at best. The rules vary from machine to machine and the maximum
|
||
allowable bet varies also. As with the video poker and video slot machines,
|
||
the owner of the machine may set the options to their taste (amount of profit).
|
||
|
||
|
||
Selected Bibliography:
|
||
----------------------
|
||
|
||
The following are some references you may want to check out and some of my
|
||
sources of information for this article. They are not in any particular order
|
||
and the format is far from standard as opposed to my thesis bibliography :)
|
||
|
||
[1] "BlackJack Forum Newsletter" by RGE Publishing in Oakland California. This
|
||
is a quarterly publication which has the location and rule variations info
|
||
(among other things) for casinos in the state of Nevada.
|
||
|
||
[2] The Gamblers Book Club (its really a store) can sell you a sample of the
|
||
BlackJack Forum Newsletter for $10.00. They have all kinds of new and out of
|
||
print books, used magazines, etc. They are located in Vegas (630 S. 11th St.)
|
||
so stop by in person or call 1-800-634-6243 which was valid as of 6/1/93 since
|
||
I just gave them a ring...the guy I spoke to was very nice and helpful so I
|
||
thought I'd give them a plug here.
|
||
|
||
[3] "Beat The Dealer" by Dr. Edward O. Thorp. Make sure you get the SECOND
|
||
edition (1966) since it has Dr. Julian Braun's additions to the original 1962
|
||
edition.
|
||
|
||
[4] "Gambling Times Magazine" (now defunct), 'BlackJack Bias Part 1 and 2' July
|
||
and August 1987 Issues by Mason Malmuth. This magazine was great because it
|
||
kept you up to date on the latest in gambling systems and what casinos are up
|
||
to. The article is about the author using his PC to perform simulations
|
||
regarding the effects of non-random card distribution on BlackJack.
|
||
|
||
[5] "Break The Dealer" by Jerry L. Patterson and Eddie Olsen, 1986 Perigee
|
||
Books. Worth the money for the chapters on Shuffle Tracking alone.
|
||
|
||
[6] "The Optimum Strategy in BlackJack" by Roger R. Baldwin, Wilbert E.
|
||
Cantey, Herbert Maisel, James P. McDermott. Journal of the American
|
||
Statistical Association, September 1956. Eight of ten pages are mathematics.
|
||
|
||
[7] "The World's Greatest BlackJack Book" revised edition (1987) by Dr. Lance
|
||
Humble and Dr. Carl Cooper, Doubleday. I am not sure it is THE world's
|
||
greatest, but it is an excellent book. It is 400 pages and provides more
|
||
details than you probably care to know about the Hi-Opt I counting system.
|
||
|
||
[8] "Turning the Tables on Las Vegas" by Ian Anderson, 1978. This is an
|
||
excellent book if you were interested in The Social Engineering the Casino
|
||
section. The author shares a lot of interesting and funny stories that can
|
||
keep you from getting barred. Note that 'Ian Anderson' is the authors' handle.
|
||
|
||
[9] "Las Vegas, Behind the Tables" by Barney Vinson, 1986, Gollehon Press.
|
||
Written by a casino executive, I found it to be quite illuminating.
|
||
|
||
[10] "Gambling Scams" by Darwin Ortiz, 1990, Carrol Publishing. If you play in
|
||
any private games, be sure to read this one to avoid getting screwed. It even
|
||
has a section on crooked carnival games.
|
||
|
||
[11] "Winning Without Counting" by Stanford Wong. This book has an interesting
|
||
section on 'Dealer Tells' and how to exploit them.
|
||
|
||
[12] "Rec.Gambling" Internet USENET Newsgroup. The rec.gambling newsgroup is
|
||
an excellent free source of current information on BlackJack and other games.
|
||
People who have just gotten back from various casinos post about their playing
|
||
results and the treatment from casinos. One person just posted that he was
|
||
barred from playing BlackJack (a casino employee told him he could play any
|
||
game in the casino EXCEPT BlackJack) after he was ahead only $40.00. The
|
||
reason apparently was due to his fairly mechanical play and betting. The
|
||
rec.gambling FAQ was message #15912 when I read the newsgroup on 6/8/93. They
|
||
plan on posting the FAQ every month or so. I found the FAQ to be very
|
||
informative. There is an alt.gambling newsgroup but it is dead with 0
|
||
messages.
|
||
|
||
[13] "The Winner's Guide to Casino Gambling", revised edition by Edwin
|
||
Silberstang, 1989 Plume printing. This book covers a wide range of casino
|
||
games and has a large list of gambling terms in the back.
|
||
|
||
[14] "Gambling and Society" edited by William R. Eadington, 1976. This book
|
||
provides plenty of information on the psychology of gambling. I found the
|
||
section on 'Who Wants to be a Professional Gambler?' interesting as the study
|
||
indicates the types of vocations that show high correlations with being a
|
||
professional gambler. One of those vocations with an 'extremely high
|
||
correlation' was being a Secret Service agent. Maybe Agent Foley will change
|
||
jobs.....he can't do much worse, ahem. Chapter 24 by James N. Hanson is
|
||
entitled "Nonlinear Programming Simulation and Gambling Theory Applied to
|
||
BlackJack" which some of you programmers might be interested in.
|
||
|
||
[15] "The BlackJack Shuffle-Tracking Treatise" by Michael R. Hall accessible
|
||
via the Internet by anonymous FTP: soda.berkeley.edu in the
|
||
pub/rec.gambling/blackjack directory. This is a very detailed 78K file that
|
||
was well done. It provides plenty of the nitty-gritty details that I did not
|
||
have the space to mention in this article. I highly recommend it.
|
||
|
||
[16] "Risk of Ruin" by Michael R. Hall available from same source as [15]
|
||
above. This paper provides some mathematical formulas for helping you
|
||
determine the likelihood of losing portions of your starting bankroll.
|
||
Although the equations look complicated, anyone with a $10. scientific
|
||
calculator can use them. The author provides source code for a program written
|
||
in C that calculates the risk formula. Also get his "Optimal Wagering" file
|
||
which helps you determine your bet size.
|
||
|
||
[17] The movie: "Fever Pitch" starring Ryan 'O Niel. This is the most realistic
|
||
movie I have seen regarding the psychology of a gambler. If I recall correctly,
|
||
it was made in 1985 and is in most video rental stores.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Final Comments:
|
||
---------------
|
||
|
||
Let me quickly thank those who took the hour to read my article, recommended
|
||
corrections and offered their insightful comments: The Marauder, Mark Tabas,
|
||
Professor Falken, Al Capone, Jester Sluggo, and Bruce Sterling. Also, I would
|
||
like to thank JLE, my 'gambling mentor' mentioned earlier even though he
|
||
doesn't know me as 'lex' and probably will never see this file.
|
||
|
||
If anyone has comments, corrections, etc. feel free to email me. Kindly
|
||
note that I have no interest in receiving flames from any self professed
|
||
BlackJack experts out there as I do not claim to be an expert and due to size
|
||
restrictions, I couldn't get all that complicated regarding counting
|
||
techniques and such. Besides, anyone who wants to get serious will take the
|
||
time to thoroughly read the references listed in the previous section. My main
|
||
purpose was to familiarize you with the game of BlackJack and provide a
|
||
resource which can point you in the right direction for more in-depth
|
||
information. Thank you for your time and I hope you learned something from
|
||
this article even if you don't put any of the information to use.
|
||
|
||
If you have something really SEKRET to tell me, here is my PGP Public Key:
|
||
|
||
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
|
||
Version: 2.2
|
||
|
||
mQCNAiwEHN4AAAEEAMtDxWI2HYsAQO8QhDBYhHvmn3fzGpKFbimxl34XiQ5woU/K
|
||
lqbD53ahfnB9ST22yxEvexXW0VGVVfSp9xiUl7d7RsTm7Uas3OaOOiSFIRCVvcG8
|
||
FnWARH0nmELBXYkXXjjvjm2BiCEkn45eFaZPX7KbCuIGVjCe3zltpJGBK2OvAAUR
|
||
tCRMZXggTHV0aG9yIDxsZXhAbWluZHZveC5waGFudG9tLmNvbT4=
|
||
=LOXY
|
||
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
|
||
|
||
|
||
End of "How To Hack BlackJack": File 2 of 2 |