warmcat.com and libwebsockets.org use Let's Encrypt certificates... LE
have changed their CA signing arrangements and after 2021-01-12 (the
point I renewed the LE server certs and received one signed using the
new arrangements) it's required to trust new root certs for the examples
to connect to warmcat.com and libwebsockets.org.
https://letsencrypt.org/2020/09/17/new-root-and-intermediates.html
This updates the in-tree CA copies, the remote policies on warmcat.com
have also been updated.
Just goes to show for real client infrastructure, you need to run your own
CA (that doesn't have to be trusted by anything outside the clients)
where you can control the CA lifetime.
This adds some new objects and helpers for keeping and logging
info on grouped allocations, a group is, eg, SS handles or client
wsis.
Allocated objects get a context-unique "tag" string intended to replace
%p / wsi pointers etc. Pointers quickly become confusing when
allocations are freed and reused, the tag string won't repeat
until you produce 2^64 objects in a context.
In addition the tag string documents the object group, with prefixes
like "wsi-" or "vh-" and contain object-specific additional
information like the vhost name, address / port or the role of the wsi.
At creation time the lws code can use a format string and args
to add whatever group-specific info makes sense, eg, a wsi bound
to a secure stream can also append the guid of the secure stream,
it's copied into the new object tag and so is still available
cleanly after the stream is destroyed if the wsi outlives it.
Since client_connect and request_tx can be called from code that expects
the ss handle to be in scope, these calls can't deal with destroying the
ss handle and must pass the lws_ss_state_return_t disposition back to
the caller to handle.
