Before this commit, line 84 read 'u' before it had a value, on 1st for-loop iteration. See comment on line 84 below:
82 for (n = 0; n < 8; n++) {
83 ctx->gpio->set(ctx->clk, inv);
84 u = (u << 1) | !!ctx->gpio->read(ctx->miso); /* <-- u is used uninitialized here */
85 ctx->gpio->set(ctx->mosi, !!(u & 0x80));
86 ctx->gpio->set(ctx->clk, !inv);
87 }
Add lws_display and minimal example support for esp32-wrover to match wsp32-heltec-wb32
Since no usable buttons that don't affect something else on wrover kit, assumes
a button to 0V on GPIO14.
Now there's an abstract button class regardless of the underlying
connection, we can add more sophicsticated analysis on top of it
for processing its usually noisy events and classifying them into
smd-ready click, long-click or double-click events.
A "regime" defines the timing limits for different press recognition
and can be specified per-button, if not given a default regime is
applied.
Make a start on generic peripheral and bus drivers to provide
meta-functionality regardless of platform.
On the one hand this simply provides...
- bitbang i2c on top of esp-idf gpio apis
- ssd1306 oled chip driver as found on Heltec WB32
- modifications to the minimal example test for esp32 to use that
... on the other hand, those capabilities are provided by creating:
- an abstract i2c class object
- an abstract gpio class object
- i2c class implementation using the abstract gpio for bitbang
- an abstract display class object
- an abstract display state (brightness, animated change,
on/off/init tracking, autodim after inactive, auto-off /
blanking after inactive)
... with the intention, eg, you only have to add a platform
implementation for the gpio to be able to use the i2c-based
display drivers and state handling, and i2c bitbang, without
any other modifications.
