Fix for 6025. Other 602x boards probably have the same problem.

This commit is contained in:
David Schleef 2002-03-18 21:49:08 +00:00
parent b7d115eafa
commit 92a02273c3

View file

@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ struct board_struct boards[]={
{ "at-mio-16xe-50", STATUS_SOME, cal_ni_at_mio_16xe_50 },
{ "at-mio-16e-1", STATUS_SOME, cal_ni_at_mio_16e_1 },
{ "pci-mio-16e-1", STATUS_DONE, cal_ni_pci_mio_16e_1 },
{ "pci-6025e", STATUS_GUESS, cal_ni_pci_6025e },
{ "pci-6025e", STATUS_SOME, cal_ni_pci_6025e },
{ "pci-6035e", STATUS_GUESS, cal_ni_pci_6035e },
{ "pci-6071e", STATUS_SOME, cal_ni_pci_6071e },
{ "pxi-6071e", STATUS_GUESS, cal_ni_pxi_6071e },
@ -466,14 +466,17 @@ void cal_ni_pci_6024e(void)
void cal_ni_pci_6025e(void)
{
postgain_cal(ni_zero_offset_low,ni_zero_offset_high,1);
cal1(ni_zero_offset_high,0);
cal1(ni_reference_low,3);
postgain_cal(ni_zero_offset_low,ni_zero_offset_high,4); // was 1
cal1(ni_zero_offset_high,XXX); // was 10
cal1(ni_zero_offset_high,8); // was 0
cal1(ni_reference_low,2); // was 3
if(do_output){
cal1(ni_ao0_zero_offset,4); // guess
cal1(ni_ao0_reference,5); // guess
cal1(ni_ao1_zero_offset,8); // guess
cal1(ni_ao1_reference,9); // guess
cal1(ni_ao0_zero_offset,6); // was 5
//cal1(ni_ao0_zero_offset,10); // nonlinearity was 4
//cal1(ni_ao0_reference,XXX); // was 6
cal1(ni_ao1_zero_offset,9); // was 8
//cal1(ni_ao1_zero_offset,1); // nonlinearity was 7
cal1(ni_ao1_reference,5); // was 9
}
}