1) This makes lwsws run a parent process with the original permissions.
But this process is only able to respond to SIGHUP, it doesn't do anything
else.
2) You can send this parent process a SIGHUP now to cause it to
- close listening sockets in existing lwsws processes
- mark those processes as to exit when the number of active connections
on the falls to zero
- spawn a fresh child process from scratch, using latest configuration
file content, latest plugins, etc. It can now reopen listening sockets
if it chooses to, or open different listen ports or whatever.
Notes:
1) lws_context_destroy() has been split into two pieces... the reason for
the split is the first part closes the per-vhost protocols, but since
they may have created libuv objects in the per-vhost protocol storage,
these cannot be freed until after the loop has been run.
That's the purpose of the second part of the context destruction,
lws_context_destroy2().
For compatibility, if you are not using libuv, the first part calls the
second part. However if you are using libuv, you must now call the
second part from your own main.c after the first part.
Lws maintains a linked-list of wsi that are on the same vhost protocol...
it walks it to perform ..._all_protocol() type apis.
Client connections also participate in this list, but in the case the
selected protocol is not given during negotation (a legal case where
the server default protocol is selected) we missed adding the new
ws negotiated client wsi to the list.
This patch makes sure we add the wsi to the vhost protocols[0] list
in that case.
https://github.com/warmcat/libwebsockets/issues/716
https://github.com/warmcat/libwebsockets/issues/706
This fixes a problem where the check for the existing pw was
skipped when a logged-in user is changing his password.
It's not good but because the user has to be logged in, it only affected
the situation someone changes his password on his logged in session.
This adds a context creation-time member that points to something
that should be freed when the context is destroyed.
It's in preparation for context deprecation, when a context might
be destroyed asynchronously... a related external with the
lifetime of thee context should also be freed at that time.
Adapt lwsws to use it with the context "strings" (also used for
aligned structs created by the config) allocation.
This should allow adding vhosts "late", ie, after the server is up and
running with its initial vhost(s). The necessary housekeeping is folded
into lws_create_vhost() itself so it should be transparent.
Notice though that at the point the server starts to do service after it
starts initially, if it was requested that the UID / GID change, that
is performed at that point and is not reversible.
So vhosts added "late" find themselves running under the unprivileged
UID / GID from the very start, whereas vhosts added "early" initially
run under the UID / GID the process started with. If protocols the
vhost uses want to, eg, open privileged files at init and then use
them unprivileged, that will fail if the vhost is added late because
the initial privs are already gone.
AG: also deal with lws_protocol_init() on late vhost init (does the
callbacks for per vh protocol creation), add comments
From linux ipv6(7) manual (section `Note`):
SOL_IP, SOL_IPV6, SOL_ICMPV6 and other SOL_* socket options are
nonportable variants of IPPROTO_*. See also ip(7).
Ref: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/ipv6.7.html
Via Dosvald
lws_service_tsi() which has been around a while actually just
calls through to lws_plat_service_tsi(), meaning there is no
need to expose both apis.
Rename the internal lws_plat_service_tsi() to _lws_plat_service_tsi()
and replace the api export with a #define to lws_service_tsi for
compatibility's sake.
Some people are calling service with zero timeout, taking care of
not busywaiting by some other external arrangements.
Adapt the forced service signalling to survive this.
Lws cares about trailing \n on a lot of these tests now. Make it check it still cares on one and remove
the trailing \n on the others.
There's 2 changes in the results about /..//?, it seems to apply / to uri arg 1. But it doesn't seem
to make a problem so just adapt the results for now.
